Literature DB >> 24016471

[Gestational weight gain and its relationship with the birthweight of offspring].

Wen-peng Wang1, Fang-fang Chen, Jie Mi, Yue Teng, Juan Zhao, Ming-hui Wu, Xue Zhang, Di Zhang, Jun-hua Wang, Hong-hong Teng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the appropriate weight gain during pregnancy and its relationship with the birthweight of offspring.
METHODS: A total of 16 460 healthy pregnant women who delivered in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital and Haidian Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital in 2010 were recruited. All are singleton pregnancies. Conditions of babies and mothers were recorded, including maternal age, height, prepregnant weight, pregnant weight, gestational weeks on delivery, delivery mode and newborn birthweight. All the pregnant women were divided into underweight, normal weight and overweight group according to their prepregnant body mass index and the criteria of overweight and obesity for Chinese adults.Birthweight between 2500 g and 4000 g was defined as normal birthweight, and 2900 g to 3499 g was defined as appropriate birthweight.Logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to explore the recommended gestational weight gain (GWG).
RESULTS: (1) The average GWG of the 16 460 women was (17.1 ± 4.9) kg, and the average birthweight of the babies was (3406 ± 400) g. Prevalence of low birthweight and macrosomia was 0.92% (152/16 460) and 7.55% (1 242/16 460), respectively.GWG of underweight (n = 3089), normal weight (n = 11 478) and overweight group (n = 1893) was (17.4 ± 4.6) kg, (17.3 ± 4.8) kg and (15.6 ± 5.3) kg, respectively. And GWG was positively related with the birthweight of offspring (P < 0.01).The differences of GWG, neonatal birthweight and macrosomia prevalence among the three groups are statistically significant (P < 0.01). (2) There are 8449 appropriate birthweight babies in the three groups.For their mothers in the underweight, normal weight and overweight group, the recommended range of GWG were 14.0-19.5 kg, 13.5-19.5 kg and 11.0-18.0 kg, respectively.The recommended GWG for all women was 16.0 kg. (3) According to the recommended GWG, low GWG will increase the risk of low birthweight (OR = 1.589, 95% CI: 1.085-2.326) and reduce the risk of macrosomia (OR = 0.500, 95% CI: 0.401-0.624). Excessive GWG will increase the risk of macrosomia (OR = 2.031, 95% CI:1.789-2.306), but will not lower the risk of low birthweight (OR = 1.168, 95% CI:0.774-1.764). (4) For the underweight, normal weight and overweight group, the range of GWG obtained by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were 16.3-16.7 kg, 15.6-17.8 kg and 14.6-15.1 kg.For all the three groups, the range was 15.6-16.7 kg.The ranges obtained by the ROC curve analysis were all within the recommended range.
CONCLUSION: The GWG was positively associated with the birthweight of offspring, and the appropriate GWG was around 16.0 kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24016471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 0529-567X


  6 in total

1.  Childbearing May Increase the Risk of Nondiabetic Cataract in Chinese Women's Old Age.

Authors:  Manqiong Yuan; Yaofeng Han; Ya Fang; Cheng-I Chu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Association of Female Reproductive Factors with Hypertension, Diabetes and LQTc in Chinese Women.

Authors:  Bayi Xu; Yequn Chen; Jianping Xiong; Nan Lu; Xuerui Tan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Investigation of optimal gestational weight gain based on the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes for Chinese women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yin Sun; Zhongzhou Shen; Yongle Zhan; Yawen Wang; Shuai Ma; Suhan Zhang; Juntao Liu; Sansan Wu; Yahui Feng; Yunli Chen; Shuya Cai; Yingjie Shi; Liangkun Ma; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Analysis and Comparison of Early Childhood Nutritional Outcomes Among Offspring of Chinese Women Under the Chinese 2021 and US 2009 Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines.

Authors:  Fangfang Chen; Peng Wang; Jing Wang; Zijun Liao; Xinnan Zong; Yiren Chen; Jianqiang Lai; Ting Zhang; Gongshu Liu; Xianghui Xie
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Parity and the risk of diabetes mellitus among Chinese women: a cross-sectional evidence from the Tongji-Dongfeng cohort study.

Authors:  Yaohua Tian; Lijun Shen; Jing Wu; Weihong Chen; Jing Yuan; Handong Yang; Youjie Wang; Yuan Liang; Tangchun Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Parity and Risk of Stroke among Chinese Women: Cross-sectional Evidence from the Dongfeng-Tongji Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yanmei Zhang; Lijun Shen; Jing Wu; Guiqiang Xu; Lulu Song; Siyi Yang; Yaohua Tian; Jing Yuan; Yuan Liang; Youjie Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.