Literature DB >> 24013569

Prescription and adherence to lymphedema self-care modalities among women with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Justin C Brown1, Andrea L Cheville, Julia C Tchou, Susan R Harris, Kathryn H Schmitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To profile the prescription for and adherence to breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) self-care modalities among breast cancer (BrCa) survivors with BCRL in a 12-month randomized weightlifting trial.
METHODS: We developed a questionnaire that assessed prescription for and adherence to 10 BCRL self-care modalities that included physical therapy exercise, pneumatic compression pump, medication, lymphedema bandaging, arm elevation, self-administered lymphatic drainage, therapist-administered lymphatic drainage, compression garments, skin care, and taping. We measured prescription for and adherence to BCRL self-care modalities at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Longitudinal logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) associated with prescription for and adherence to BCRL modalities over time.
RESULTS: This study included 141 BrCa survivors with BCRL. Women were prescribed an average of 3.6 ± 2.1 BCRL self-care modalities during the study. The prescription for therapist-administered lymphatic drainage (OR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.88-0.96), pneumatic compression pump use (OR = 0.94, 95 % CI 0.89-0.98), and bandaging (OR = 0.96, 95 % CI 0.93-0.99) decreased over 12 months of follow-up. No other prescribed BCRL self-care modalities changed during the study. Over 12 months, the average adherence to all BCRL self-care modalities varied with 13, 24, 32, and 31 % of women reporting <25, 25-49, 50-74, and ≥75 % adherence, respectively. Over 12 months, there was a noticeable change from high to low adherence in self-administered lymphatic drainage, such that there was a 15 % increased likelihood of adherence <25 % compared to ≥75 % (OR = 1.15 (95 % CI 1.05-1.26); p = 0.002). The adherence patterns of all other modalities did not change over follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the prescription for BCRL self-care modalities is variable. The average adherence to BCRL self-care was non-optimal. Future research is necessary to prepare BrCa survivors with the knowledge, skills, abilities, and resources necessary to care for this lifelong condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013569      PMCID: PMC4122426          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1962-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  45 in total

Review 1.  Incidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema.

Authors:  J A Petrek; M C Heelan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods.

Authors:  M Aickin; H Gensler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The problem of post-breast cancer lymphedema: impact and measurement issues.

Authors:  Jane M Armer
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 4.  Lymphedema: current issues in research and management.

Authors:  J A Petrek; P I Pressman; R A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 11. Lymphedema.

Authors:  S R Harris; M R Hugi; I A Olivotto; M Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Lymphoedema care of breast cancer patients in a breast care clinic: a survey of knowledge and health practice.

Authors:  Y M Lee; S S Mak; S M Tse; S J Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Psychosocial aspects of upper extremity lymphedema in women treated for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S D Passik; M V McDonald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning.

Authors:  K C Sneeuw; N K Aaronson; J R Yarnold; M Broderick; J Regan; G Ross; A Goddard
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Improving the physical status and quality of life of women treated for breast cancer: a pilot study of a structured exercise intervention.

Authors:  Jane Turner; Sandi Hayes; Hildegard Reul-Hirche
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: a comparison of partial and total mastectomy.

Authors:  E Maunsell; J Brisson; L Deschenes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  25 in total

1.  Factors predicting adherence to risk management behaviors of women at increased risk for developing lymphedema.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Pagona Roussi; Alan Taylor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Use of compression garments by women with lymphoedema secondary to breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  E Longhurst; E S Dylke; S L Kilbreath
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Self-Management Strategies for Malignant Lymphedema: A Case Report with 1-Year and 4-Year Follow-Up Data.

Authors:  Shirin M Shallwani; Anna Towers
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Association between lymphedema self-care adherence and lymphedema outcomes among women with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Justin C Brown; Anagha Kumar; Andrea L Cheville; Julia C Tchou; Andrea B Troxel; Susan R Harris; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Breast cancer-related lymphedema patient and healthcare professional experiences in lymphedema self-management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Huihui Zhao; Yanni Wu; Chunlan Zhou; Wenji Li; Xiaojin Li; Liling Chen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Subclinical Lymphedema After Treatment for Breast Cancer: Risk of Progression and Considerations for Early Intervention.

Authors:  Loryn K Bucci; Cheryl L Brunelle; Madison C Bernstein; Amy M Shui; Tessa C Gillespie; Sacha A Roberts; George E Naoum; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Association Between Maximal Bench Press Strength and Isometric Handgrip Strength Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin H Rogers; Justin C Brown; David R Gater; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Safety and tolerability of Kinesio Taping in patients with arm lymphedema: medical device clinical study.

Authors:  Jacqueline de Carvalho Martins; Suzana Sales Aguiar; Erica Alves Nogueira Fabro; Rejane Medeiros Costa; Thiago Vilela Lemos; Vinicius Gienbinsky Guapyassú de Sá; Raphael Mello de Abreu; Mauro Figueiredo Carvalho de Andrade; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler; Anke Bergmann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Patient Perceptions of Barriers to Self-Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Pamela L Ostby; Jane M Armer; Kandis Smith; Bob R Stewart
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  Differences in limb volume trajectories after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Betty Smoot; Bruce A Cooper; Yvette Conley; Kord Kober; Jon D Levine; Judy Mastick; Kimberly Topp; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.