Loryn K Bucci1, Cheryl L Brunelle2, Madison C Bernstein1, Amy M Shui3, Tessa C Gillespie1, Sacha A Roberts1, George E Naoum1, Alphonse G Taghian4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. ataghian@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a devastating complication of breast cancer (BC) treatment. The authors hypothesized that identifying subclinical lymphedema (SCL) presents an opportunity to prevent BCRL development. They aimed to assess rates of SCL progression (relative volume change [RVC], 5-10%) to BCRL (RVC, ≥10%) in women undergoing axillary surgery for BC via axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). METHODS: Patients treated for BC were prospectively screened at preoperative baseline and throughout the follow-up period using the perometer. The cohort was stratified according to nodal surgery (ALND or SLNB) to analyze rates of progression to BCRL. RESULTS: The study cohort included 1790 patients. Of the 1359 patients who underwent SLNB, 331 (24.4%) experienced SCL, with 38 (11.5%) of these patients progressing to BCRL. Of the 431 patients who underwent ALND, 171 (39.7%) experienced SCL, with 67 (39.2%) of these patients progressing to BCRL. Relative to the patients without SCL, those more likely to experience BCRL were the ALND patients with early SCL (< 3 months postoperatively; hazard ratio [HR], 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-4.27; p = 0.0002) or late SCL (≥3 months postoperatively; HR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.95-5.05; p < 0.0001) and the SLNB patients with early SCL (HR, 6.75; 95% CI, 3.8-11.98; p < 0.0001 or late SCL (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.65-5.50; p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that patients with SCL after axillary nodal surgery for BC are more likely to progress to BCRL than those who do not experience SCL. This presents a tremendous opportunity for early intervention to prevent BCRL and improve the quality of life for women treated for BC.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a devastating complication of breast cancer (BC) treatment. The authors hypothesized that identifying subclinical lymphedema (SCL) presents an opportunity to prevent BCRL development. They aimed to assess rates of SCL progression (relative volume change [RVC], 5-10%) to BCRL (RVC, ≥10%) in women undergoing axillary surgery for BC via axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). METHODS:Patients treated for BC were prospectively screened at preoperative baseline and throughout the follow-up period using the perometer. The cohort was stratified according to nodal surgery (ALND or SLNB) to analyze rates of progression to BCRL. RESULTS: The study cohort included 1790 patients. Of the 1359 patients who underwent SLNB, 331 (24.4%) experienced SCL, with 38 (11.5%) of these patients progressing to BCRL. Of the 431 patients who underwent ALND, 171 (39.7%) experienced SCL, with 67 (39.2%) of these patients progressing to BCRL. Relative to the patients without SCL, those more likely to experience BCRL were the ALND patients with early SCL (< 3 months postoperatively; hazard ratio [HR], 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-4.27; p = 0.0002) or late SCL (≥3 months postoperatively; HR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.95-5.05; p < 0.0001) and the SLNB patients with early SCL (HR, 6.75; 95% CI, 3.8-11.98; p < 0.0001 or late SCL (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.65-5.50; p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that patients with SCL after axillary nodal surgery for BC are more likely to progress to BCRL than those who do not experience SCL. This presents a tremendous opportunity for early intervention to prevent BCRL and improve the quality of life for women treated for BC.
Authors: Rebecca J Tsai; Leslie K Dennis; Charles F Lynch; Linda G Snetselaar; Gideon K D Zamba; Carol Scott-Conner Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Nicole L Stout; Jill M Binkley; Kathryn H Schmitz; Kimberly Andrews; Sandra C Hayes; Kristin L Campbell; Margaret L McNeely; Peter W Soballe; Ann M Berger; Andrea L Cheville; Carol Fabian; Lynn H Gerber; Susan R Harris; Karin Johansson; Andrea L Pusic; Robert G Prosnitz; Robert A Smith Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Ying Xu; Janice N Cormier; Sharon Giordano; Sheila H Ridner; Thomas A Buchholz; George H Perkins; Linda S Elting Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sheila H Ridner; Mary S Dietrich; Michael S Cowher; Bret Taback; Sarah McLaughlin; Nicolas Ajkay; John Boyages; Louise Koelmeyer; Sarah M DeSnyder; Jamie Wagner; Vandana Abramson; Andrew Moore; Chirag Shah Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Melissa B Aldrich; John C Rasmussen; Sarah M DeSnyder; Wendy A Woodward; Wenyaw Chan; Eva M Sevick-Muraca; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Benjamin D Smith; Michael C Stauder; Eric A Strom; George H Perkins; Karen E Hoffman; Melissa P Mitchell; Carlos H Barcenas; Lynn E Isales; Simona F Shaitelman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-07-10 Impact factor: 4.624