Literature DB >> 26678895

Differences in limb volume trajectories after breast cancer treatment.

Betty Smoot1,2, Bruce A Cooper3, Yvette Conley4, Kord Kober3, Jon D Levine5, Judy Mastick3, Kimberly Topp6,7, Christine Miaskowski3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Approximately 20 % of patients develop lymphedema (LE) following breast cancer (BC) surgery. An evaluation of distinct trajectories of volume change may improve our ability to diagnose LE sooner. The purposes of this study were to identify subgroups of women with distinct trajectories of limb volume changes following BC surgery and to evaluate for phenotypic differences among these classes.
METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal study, 380 women were enrolled prior to unilateral BC surgery. Upper limb bioimpedance was measured preoperatively and serially for 1 year postoperatively. Resistance ratios (RRs) were calculated. A RR of >1 indicates affected limb volume > unaffected limb volume. Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) was used to identify classes of women with distinct postoperative RR trajectories. Differences among classes were evaluated using analyses of variance and chi-square analyses.
RESULTS: Three distinct classes were identified as follows: RR <0.95 (37.9 %), RR ~1.00 (46.8 %), and RR >1.05 (15.3 %). Patients in the RR >1.05 class were more likely to have diabetes (p = 0.036), were more likely to have BC on their dominant side (p < 0.001), had higher RR ratios at the preoperative and 1-month assessments (p < 0.001), and were more likely to be diagnosed with LE (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: LCGA is a useful analytic technique to identify subgroups of women who may be at higher risk for the development of LE, based on trajectories of limb volume change after BC surgery. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Assessment of preoperative and 1-month bioimpedance RRs may allow for the earlier identification of patients who are at higher risk for the development of LE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioimpedance spectroscopy; Breast cancer; Latent class analysis; Lymphedema; Resistance ratios; Upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26678895      PMCID: PMC4912957          DOI: 10.1007/s11764-015-0507-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  37 in total

1.  Objective and subjective upper body function six months following diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandi Hayes; Diana Battistutta; Beth Newman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jeanette Ezzo; Eric Manheimer; Margaret L McNeely; Doris M Howell; Robert Weiss; Karin I Johansson; Ting Bao; Linda Bily; Catherine M Tuppo; Anne F Williams; Didem Karadibak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

3.  The effect of prospective monitoring and early physiotherapy intervention on arm morbidity following surgery for breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chiara Singh; Mary De Vera; Kristin L Campbell
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Nomograms for predicting the risk of arm lymphedema after axillary dissection in breast cancer.

Authors:  José Luiz B Bevilacqua; Michael W Kattan; Yu Changhong; Sergio Koifman; Inês E Mattos; Rosalina J Koifman; Anke Bergmann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Complication rates in patients with negative axillary nodes 10 years after local breast radiotherapy after either sentinel lymph node dissection or axillary clearance.

Authors:  A Gabriella Wernicke; Michael Shamis; Kulbir K Sidhu; Bruce C Turner; Yevgenyia Goltser; Imraan Khan; Paul J Christos; Lydia T Komarnicky-Kocher
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.

Authors:  Antoinette P Sander; Nicole M Hajer; Kristie Hemenway; Amy C Miller
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-12

Review 7.  Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Julie A Dean; Jill M Oliveri; J Phil Harrop
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  The pathophysiology of lymphedema.

Authors:  P S Mortimer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout Gergich; Lucinda A Pfalzer; Charles McGarvey; Barbara Springer; Lynn H Gerber; Peter Soballe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Impact of lymphoedema on arm function and health-related quality of life in women following breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Diana J Dawes; Sarkis Meterissian; Mark Goldberg; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of Arm Volume Using a Tape Measure Versus a 3D Optical Scanner in Survivors with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Judy Mastick; Betty J Smoot; Steven M Paul; Kord M Kober; Bruce A Cooper; Lori K Madden; Yvette P Conley; Niharika Dixit; Marilyn J Hammer; Mei R Fu; Merisa Piper; Sarah P Cate; John Shepherd; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.589

2.  A Comparison of Supine Versus Stand-on Bioimpedance Devices to Assess Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Judy Mastick; Betty J Smoot; Steven M Paul; Kord M Kober; Deborah Hamolsky; Lori K Madden; Yvette P Conley; Niharika Dixit; Marilyn J Hammer; Mei R Fu; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.589

3.  L-Dex, arm volume, and symptom trajectories 24 months after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner; Chirag Shah; John Boyages; Louise Koelmeyer; Nicolas Ajkay; Sarah M DeSnyder; Sarah A McLaughlin; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Early recovery trajectories after fast-track primary total hip arthroplasty: the role of patient characteristics.

Authors:  Jarry T Porsius; Nina M C Mathijssen; Lisette C M Klapwijk-Van Heijningen; Jeroen C Van Egmond; Marijke Melles; Stephan B W Vehmeijer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.