Literature DB >> 24013208

Structure of a pseudokinase-domain switch that controls oncogenic activation of Jak kinases.

Angela V Toms1, Anagha Deshpande, Randall McNally, Youngjee Jeong, Julia M Rogers, Chae Un Kim, Sol M Gruner, Scott B Ficarro, Jarrod A Marto, Martin Sattler, James D Griffin, Michael J Eck.   

Abstract

The V617F mutation in the Jak2 pseudokinase domain causes myeloproliferative neoplasms, and the equivalent mutation in Jak1 (V658F) is found in T-cell leukemias. Crystal structures of wild-type and V658F-mutant human Jak1 pseudokinase reveal a conformational switch that remodels a linker segment encoded by exon 12, which is also a site of mutations in Jak2. This switch is required for V617F-mediated Jak2 activation and possibly for physiologic Jak activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24013208      PMCID: PMC3863620          DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


The receptors for diverse cytokines, including erythropoietin (EPO), growth hormone, interleukins and interferons, initiate intracellular signaling via one or more members of the Jak family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases[1,2]. Jak kinases contain a FERM domain, an SH2-like domain, and a pseudokinase domain (also referred to as the Jak homology 2, or JH2 domain) adjacent to their C-terminal tyrosine kinase domain (Fig. 1a). The pseudokinase domain has a protein kinase fold, but key catalytic residues are not conserved and the domain is thought to inhibit the adjacent tyrosine kinase domain, perhaps via an intramolecular interaction[3]. Somatic gain-of-function mutations in Jaks underlie a number of hematologic malignancies[4], and the pseudokinase domain is the most frequent site of these activating mutations[5]. In particular, the V617F mutation in the Jak2 pseudokinase is found in ∼95% of patients with polycythemia vera (PV)[6-9], a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by EPO-independent overproduction of red blood cells due to constitutive signaling from Jak2 V617F in complex with the erythropoietin receptor (EPO-R)[10]. The corresponding mutation in Jak1 (V658F) has been identified in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia[11] and also leads to constitutive catalytic activation[12]. A subset of PV patients who are V617F-negative have mutations in exon 12 of Jak2[13,14], which encodes a portion of the polypeptide chain that links the SH2-like and pseudokinase domains (SH2-PK linker).
Figure 1
To better understand the pseudokinase domain and the effects of pathogenic mutations, we determined crystal structures of a wild type and V658F mutant fragment of human Jak1 spanning the pseudokinase domain and a segment of the SH2-PK linker (residues 561-852). The wild type and mutant structures were refined at resolutions of 1.8Å and 1.9Å, respectively (see Supplementary Table 1 and Methods online). The overall architecture of the pseudokinase domain closely resembles that of typical tyrosine kinases, with an N-terminal lobe composed of five β-strands and the C-helix, and a larger C-terminal lobe (Fig. 1b). Several features of the pseudokinase domain appear to be inconsistent with phosphotransfer activity. In particular, the region corresponding to the kinase activation loop adopts a well-defined conformation that is expected to preclude binding of polypeptide substrates (Supplementary Fig. 1). At the N-terminus of the domain, the SH2-PK linker adopts a partially α-helical conformation and extends across the N-lobe, roughly perpendicular to the C-helix. The Jak1 domain superimposes well with a recently reported structure of the Jak2 pseudokinase[15] (RMSD 1.26 Å for 261 equivalent residues, Fig. 1c), but the Jak2 structure lacks the SH2-PK linker, which was truncated in the crystallized construct. Val658 lies within the N-lobe of the domain, at the end of strand β4. In the V658F mutant, the β4-β5 loop folds inward toward the C-helix, and the mutant Phe658 packs in an edge-to-face manner with Phe636 in the C-helix (Fig. 2a). Strikingly, the phenyl ring of Phe658 occupies precisely the same position occupied by that of Phe575 in the wild type structure. Phe575 lies in the SH2-PK linker, and the V658F mutation induces a coordinated rearrangement of this segment. In the mutant, Phe575 is shifted by ∼10Å and becomes solvent-exposed. Both the V658F and wild type crystals contain two molecules in the asymmetric unit, and interestingly, we observe essentially the same rearrangement in molecule “B” in the wild type structure that we observe in the V658F mutant, demonstrating that the wild type pseudokinase domain can also adopt the Phe575-flipped conformation (Fig. 2b). In the V658F mutant structure, both the A and B molecules adopt the “flipped” conformation with Phe575 exposed. The electron density for the linker segments is clear and continuous in both the wild type and V658F structures (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b).
Figure 2
Three residues appear to be centrally important for the observed rearrangement; Phe575 in the SH2-PK linker, Phe636 in the C-helix, and V658F, the site of the MPN mutation (V617F-site). We refer to these three residues as the F-F-V triad. This triad is highly conserved in Jak-family kinases, and these residues appear to be evolutionarily “coupled”; that is, substitutions in one position are almost invariably accompanied by changes in one of the other residues in the triad (Supplementary file ConSurf_Alignment.pdf). Interestingly, human Jak3 has a methionine at the V617F-site, and is the only human Jak kinase that is not activated by phenylalanine mutations at this site[12]. This pattern of conservation of residues comprising the F-F-V triad, combined with our observation that the wild type pseudokinase domain can also adopt the flipped conformation, leads us to speculate that the observed rearrangement is part of a structural switch controlling catalytic activation both in wild type Jak kinases and in the context of the V617F-site mutation. Consistent with a model in which the mutation promotes a rearrangement related to that induced by cytokine, cells bearing Jak2 V617F are hyper-responsive to EPO and even absent EPO stimulation, they proliferate at a rate equivalent to cells bearing wild type Jak2 with cytokine stimulation[8]. In contrast, pseudokinase domain deletions result in constitutive but diminished catalytic activation, and deletion mutants are not further stimulated by cytokine[3]. To examine the requirement for the observed phenylalanine-flip rearrangement in Jak activation, we introduced point mutations in the SH2-PK linker and F-F-V triad and tested their effect on the ability of the V617F mutation in Jak2 to promote IL-3 independent growth of Ba/F3 cells. We carried out this structure-function analysis in Jak2 because of the availability of the well-characterized Ba/F3 cell system (Ba/F3.EPO-R) in which the EPO receptor is co-expressed with mutant Jak2 to allow its proper folding and maturation[16]. In the SH2-PK linker, mutation of the flipped phenylalanine (Phe537 in Jak2) to either valine or alanine abrogated V617F-driven proliferation (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 3). Residue Leu573 forms hydrophobic interactions that appear to stabilize the helical segment of the SH2-PK linker, and mutation of the corresponding residue in Jak2 from methionine to alanine (M535A) also reversed V617F-driven proliferation. In contrast, a conservative M535F substitution at this position was without effect (Fig. 2c). Phe636 in the C-helix forms the platform for the observed rearrangement, and we found that mutation of the corresponding residue in Jak2 (Phe595) to alanine also abrogated the transforming effect of V617F (Fig. 2c), as previously observed[17,18]. The V615F mutation in Jak2 modestly enhanced proliferation as compared with V617F alone, consistent with a role in promoting the SH2-PK linker rearrangement, but was not activating on its own (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 4f). Collectively, the effects of these mutations support a role for the phenylalanine-flip rearrangement in V617F-driven Jak2 activation. Analysis of these mutations in the context of wild type Jak2 reconstituted in Jak2-deficient cells will be required to establish whether the rearrangement is also required for EPO-driven activation of Jak2. We also probed a crystal packing interaction between the two molecules in the asymmetric unit. This non-crystallographic dimer buries a large surface area (∼2080 Å[2]) and involves both V658F and Phe575 in the SH2-PK linker, but we found no role for this interface in Jak regulation (Supplementary Fig. 4). Somatic gain of function mutations in exon 12 of Jak2 map to the SH2-PK linker, and an activating mutation in Jak3 is also found in this region (Fig. 2d). These alterations are expected to disrupt the observed conformation of the linker and may promote repositioning of the β4-β5 loop as we observe in the Jak1 V658F mutant (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d). Such a shift in the β4-β5 loop would in turn require rearrangement of the linker segment. Interestingly, an in vitro screen with Jak2 identified similar activating point mutations in the SH2-PK linker, leading to the conclusion that the SH2-PK linker is critical for mediating autoinhibition and cytokine-induced activation of Jak2[19]. While this manuscript was under review, a structure of the wild type Tyk2 pseudokinase domain was released in the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 3ZON). The Tyk2 structure does include the SH2-PK linker and is very similar overall to the wild type Jak1 structure described here (RMSD 1.15Å for 258 aligned residues), however the linker conformation differs in detail (Supplementary Fig. 5). In Tyk2, the linker takes a similar path across the N-lobe, but does not adopt a helical conformation. Despite this difference, Phe581 (the equivalent of Phe575 in Jak1) is also in contact with the phenylalanine in the C-helix and would also be expected to rearrange in the context of the V617F-site mutation. It is unclear whether the difference in linker conformation represents a genuine difference between Jak1 and Tyk2, or whether it may arise from crystal packing interactions in this region in one or both structures. In the Jak2 pseudokinase domain, stabilization of the C-helix is proposed to mediate in part the activating effect of the V617F mutation[15]. The C-helix is three residues longer at its N-terminus in the V617F mutant, and a break in regular hydrogen bonding near the center of the helix is also “repaired” in the V617F structure. This break in the C-helix appears to be unique to the Jak2 wild type structure, as the C-helix is continuous in all of our Jak1 structures and in Tyk2. However, we do observe a corresponding difference in the length of the C-helix in molecule “A” as compared with molecule “B” in the Jak1 pseudokinase structures, irrespective of the presence of the V658F mutation. In the Tyk2 pseudokinase domain, the longer C-helix is also observed in the wild-type context. Thus this is a conformationally labile region of the pseudokinase domain, but further work will be required to understand how alternate conformations of this segment may relate to Jak regulation. Despite the lack of conserved active site residues, the Jak2 pseudokinase domain is reported to have catalytic activity and to autophosphorylate itself on both Ser523 and Tyr570[20]. These are autoinhibitory phosphorylation sites, and the V617F mutation has been proposed to promote Jak2 activation in part by abrogating pseudokinase catalytic activity and therefore phosphorylation of these sites[15,20]. The Ser523 and Tyr570 phosphorylation sites are not conserved in Jak1 or other family members, and we do not observe autophosphorylation of the Jak1 pseudokinase domain at alternate sites (Supplementary Fig. 6). Furthermore, the pseudokinase activation loop in Jak1 and Jak2, in both wild type and V617F-site mutants, adopts a conformation that blocks the expected position of a phosphoacceptor (Supplementary Fig. 1e). While we do not dismiss the possibility that catalytic activity of the pseudokinase domain plays a role in regulation of Jak2 and perhaps other family members, we favor a model in which the V617F mutation promotes activation primarily via rearrangement of the pseudokinase domain and SH2-PK linker, as described here. The F-F-V triad, which is central to this rearrangement, is highly conserved among all Jak kinases. Furthermore, this model provides a unifying explanation for the activating effects of both the V617F and exon 12 mutations in myeloproliferative disorders. An obvious outstanding question is how the rearrangement we observe here leads to activation of the adjacent tyrosine kinase domain. The remodeled surface of the linker/pseudokinase unit could destabilize autoinhibitory interactions within the intact Jak kinase and also potentially promote activation by favoring dimerization or via intramolecular interaction with the kinase domain proper. Structural studies of longer fragments of Jak including at a minimum both the pseudokinase and kinase domains will be required to definitively address this question at a structural level.

Online Methods

Protein expression and purification

Constructs spanning residues 561-852 of human Jak1 bearing the wild-type sequence or V658F mutation were subcloned into a modified pTriEx vector (Novagen) for expression as N-terminal 6xHis plus glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins with a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease recognition sequence. The recombinant baculoviruses were generated using the BacVector3000 system (Invitrogen) and subsequently plaque purified. For induction of protein expression the BIICs/TIPS method was used[21]. Hi5 cells were cultured in shaker flasks using Express Five serum free medium and at a cell density of ∼1.4 million/mL, cultures were infected with recombinant baculovirus. Infection was allowed to proceed for 60-66 hr to achieve optimal expression of target protein prior to harvest by centrifugation. The cells were washed once in 20mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. For lysis, cells were thawed, resuspended in lysis buffer (100mM Tris pH8, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1% Nonidet-P40 and Roche Complete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail) and incubated on ice for 45 minutes. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was incubated for 45 minutes at 4°C with Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen). Beads were washed with a step gradient of Ni wash buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 0.02% CHAPS) containing 0 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM and 40 mM imidazole and then eluted with elution buffer (Ni wash buffer with 250 mM imidazole). The eluate was supplemented with 5 mM DTT and then incubated with glutathione sepharose (GE Healthcare) beads for 2 hours at 4°C. The beads were washed and protein eluted by GST elution buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2.5 mM TCEP, 5 mM glutathione and 0.02% CHAPS). TEV protease was then added and digestion was carried out at 4°C overnight to remove the 6xHis-GST tag. The digested protein was supplemented with 15 mM imidazole and passed over a Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) column to remove 6xHis-GST tag and 6xHis-tagged TEV protease. The flow-through was concentrated and run on a Superdex 200 gel filtration column equilibrated in final buffer (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 4 mM DTT and 0.02% CHAPS). The eluted peak was concentrated to 4 mg/ml, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C.

Crystallization and structure determination

Crystals of both the wild type and V658F Jak1 pseudokinase were grown by hanging drop vapor diffusion at 20°C by mixing equal volumes of protein solution with a well solution consisting of 1.2 – 1.5 M sodium citrate (pH 6.3-6.6), 6 mM DTT and 0-30 mM NDSB 256. Prior to data collection crystals were coated in NVH oil and then high-pressure cryocooled[22] or directly plunge-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Data for Jak1 WT were collected at CHESS on beamline A1. Data for Jak1 V658F were collected at the Advanced Photon Source on beamline 24-C. Diffraction data were processed with the HKL suite of programs[23]. The structure was determined by molecular replacement using the C-lobe of focal adhesion kinase (PDB ID 1MP8[24] as a search model. The model was fit to the crystallographic data via manual model building with Coot[25] and refinement with CNS[26,27] and REFMAC[28,29], and for the Jak1 WT structure was ultimately refined to a crystallographic R-value of 18.2 (Rfree=20.9). Analogous procedures were used to obtain the structure of the V658F mutant.

Mass spectrometry

The Jak1 pseudokinase domain (residues 561-852) was incubated with 300 units/mL calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP) (New England Biosciences) at 37°C for 30 minutes or 1 mM ATP/10 mM MgCl2 at 37°C for 30 minutes followed by 300 units/mL CIP at 37°C for 30 minutes. Treated and untreated Jak1 pseudokinase (5 μg) were injected onto a self-packed reversed phased column (1/32” O.D. × 500 μm I.D. PEEK tubing with 5 cm of POROS 10R2 resin). After desalting, protein was eluted with an HPLC gradient (0-100% B in 1 minute, A=0.2M acetic acid in water, B=0.2 M acetic acid in acetonitrile, flow rate = 10 μL/min) into an LTQ ion trap mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). Data were acquired in profile mode scanning m/z 300-2000. Mass spectra were deconvoluted using MagTran1.03b2 software[30].

Autoradiography

Jak1 pseudokinase at a concentration of 1 mg/mL was incubated at room temperature with 1 μCi [γ-32P]-ATP in a reaction buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 4 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2 or MnCl2, and quenched with the addition of 100 mM EDTA. The autophosphorylation of EGFR kinase domain was measured under identical conditions as a positive control for detection of phosphorylation. Phosphorylation was monitored by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.

Analysis of Jak2 mutants in Ba/F3 cells

Structure-function studies of Jak2 mutants in Ba/F3 cells bearing the Epo receptor were carried out essentially as previously described[31]. Briefly, point mutations were introduced in the pMSCV.JAK2V617F expression vector by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuickChange II XL Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent technologies) and specific primers constructed. The sequence of the entire mutagenized cDNA was verified by DNA sequencing. Mouse Ba/F3 cells expressing EPO-R (Ba/F3.EPO-R) were maintained in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum and WEHI-3B conditioned medium. Ba/F3.EPO-R cells were transduced with the mutagenized Jak2 V617F using retroviral supernatant (293T cell method) by spin infection. Cells were grown for 2 days and sorted for GFP positive cells. Proliferation was measured by growing cells in 1 mL cultures with or without IL-3 for three days. The number of viable cells was determined daily using trypan blue exclusion.
  31 in total

Review 1.  Hematopoietic cytokine receptor signaling.

Authors:  S J Baker; S G Rane; E P Reddy
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera.

Authors:  Chloé James; Valérie Ugo; Jean-Pierre Le Couédic; Judith Staerk; François Delhommeau; Catherine Lacout; Loïc Garçon; Hana Raslova; Roland Berger; Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli; Jean Luc Villeval; Stefan N Constantinescu; Nicole Casadevall; William Vainchenker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  JAK1 and Tyk2 activation by the homologous polycythemia vera JAK2 V617F mutation: cross-talk with IGF1 receptor.

Authors:  Judith Staerk; Anders Kallin; Jean-Baptiste Demoulin; William Vainchenker; Stefan N Constantinescu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Phosphorylation reaction in cAPK protein kinase-free energy quantum mechanical/molecular mechanics simulations.

Authors:  Marat Valiev; Jie Yang; Joseph A Adams; Susan S Taylor; John H Weare
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  The Jak2V617F oncogene associated with myeloproliferative diseases requires a functional FERM domain for transformation and for expression of the Myc and Pim proto-oncogenes.

Authors:  Gerlinde Wernig; Jeffrey R Gonneville; Brian J Crowley; Margret S Rodrigues; Mamatha M Reddy; Heidi E Hudon; Christoph Walz; Andreas Reiter; Klaus Podar; Yohan Royer; Stefan N Constantinescu; Michael H Tomasson; James D Griffin; D Gary Gilliland; Martin Sattler
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Specific JAK2 mutation (JAK2R683) and multiple gene deletions in Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Lyndal Kearney; David Gonzalez De Castro; Jenny Yeung; Julia Procter; Sharon W Horsley; Minenori Eguchi-Ishimae; Caroline M Bateman; Kristina Anderson; Tracy Chaplin; Bryan D Young; Christine J Harrison; Helena Kempski; Chi Wai E So; Anthony M Ford; Mel Greaves
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Somatic mutations of JAK1 and JAK3 in acute leukemias and solid cancers.

Authors:  Eun Goo Jeong; Min Sung Kim; Hyo Kyung Nam; Chang Ki Min; Seok Lee; Yeun Jun Chung; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Mutations of JAK2 in acute lymphoblastic leukaemias associated with Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Dani Bercovich; Ithamar Ganmore; Linda M Scott; Gilad Wainreb; Yehudit Birger; Arava Elimelech; Chen Shochat; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Andrea Biondi; Giuseppe Basso; Gunnar Cario; Martin Schrappe; Martin Stanulla; Sabine Strehl; Oskar A Haas; Georg Mann; Vera Binder; Arndt Borkhardt; Helena Kempski; Jan Trka; Bella Bielorei; Smadar Avigad; Batia Stark; Owen Smith; Nicole Dastugue; Jean-Pierre Bourquin; Nir Ben Tal; Anthony R Green; Shai Izraeli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  JAK2 exon 12 mutations in polycythemia vera and idiopathic erythrocytosis.

Authors:  Linda M Scott; Wei Tong; Ross L Levine; Mike A Scott; Philip A Beer; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Wendy N Erber; Mary Frances McMullin; Claire N Harrison; Alan J Warren; D Gary Gilliland; Harvey F Lodish; Anthony R Green
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Somatically acquired JAK1 mutations in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Elisabetta Flex; Valentina Petrangeli; Lorenzo Stella; Sabina Chiaretti; Tekla Hornakova; Laurent Knoops; Cristina Ariola; Valentina Fodale; Emmanuelle Clappier; Francesca Paoloni; Simone Martinelli; Alessandra Fragale; Massimo Sanchez; Simona Tavolaro; Monica Messina; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Andrea Camera; Giovanni Pizzolo; Assunta Tornesello; Marco Vignetti; Angela Battistini; Hélène Cavé; Bruce D Gelb; Jean-Christophe Renauld; Andrea Biondi; Stefan N Constantinescu; Robin Foà; Marco Tartaglia
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  34 in total

1.  Structural modeling of JAK1 mutations in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia reveals a second contact site between pseudokinase and kinase domains.

Authors:  Kirsten Canté-Barrett; Joost C M Uitdehaag; Jules P P Meijerink
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  ATP binding to the pseudokinase domain of JAK2 is critical for pathogenic activation.

Authors:  Henrik M Hammarén; Daniela Ungureanu; Jean Grisouard; Radek C Skoda; Stevan R Hubbard; Olli Silvennoinen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The molecular details of cytokine signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway.

Authors:  Rhiannon Morris; Nadia J Kershaw; Jeffrey J Babon
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Structure of the pseudokinase-kinase domains from protein kinase TYK2 reveals a mechanism for Janus kinase (JAK) autoinhibition.

Authors:  Patrick J Lupardus; Mark Ultsch; Heidi Wallweber; Pawan Bir Kohli; Adam R Johnson; Charles Eigenbrot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Molecular insights into regulation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Olli Silvennoinen; Stevan R Hubbard
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Janus kinase 2 activation mechanisms revealed by analysis of suppressing mutations.

Authors:  Henrik M Hammarén; Anniina T Virtanen; Bobin George Abraham; Heidi Peussa; Stevan R Hubbard; Olli Silvennoinen
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Mechanism of homodimeric cytokine receptor activation and dysregulation by oncogenic mutations.

Authors:  Stephan Wilmes; Maximillian Hafer; Joni Vuorio; Julie A Tucker; Hauke Winkelmann; Sara Löchte; Tess A Stanly; Katiuska D Pulgar Prieto; Chetan Poojari; Vivek Sharma; Christian P Richter; Rainer Kurre; Stevan R Hubbard; K Christopher Garcia; Ignacio Moraga; Ilpo Vattulainen; Ian S Hitchcock; Jacob Piehler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Identification and Characterization of JAK2 Pseudokinase Domain Small Molecule Binders.

Authors:  David E Puleo; Kaury Kucera; Henrik M Hammarén; Daniela Ungureanu; Ana S Newton; Olli Silvennoinen; William L Jorgensen; Joseph Schlessinger
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Mechanistic insights into activation and SOCS3-mediated inhibition of myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated JAK2 mutants from biochemical and structural analyses.

Authors:  Leila N Varghese; Daniela Ungureanu; Nicholas P D Liau; Samuel N Young; Artem Laktyushin; Henrik Hammaren; Isabelle S Lucet; Nicos A Nicola; Olli Silvennoinen; Jeffrey J Babon; James M Murphy
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Tyrosine Kinase 2-mediated Signal Transduction in T Lymphocytes Is Blocked by Pharmacological Stabilization of Its Pseudokinase Domain.

Authors:  John S Tokarski; Adriana Zupa-Fernandez; Jeffrey A Tredup; Kristen Pike; ChiehYing Chang; Dianlin Xie; Lihong Cheng; Donna Pedicord; Jodi Muckelbauer; Stephen R Johnson; Sophie Wu; Suzanne C Edavettal; Yang Hong; Mark R Witmer; Lisa L Elkin; Yuval Blat; William J Pitts; David S Weinstein; James R Burke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.