Henrik M Hammarén1, Anniina T Virtanen1, Bobin George Abraham1, Heidi Peussa1, Stevan R Hubbard2, Olli Silvennoinen3. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 2. Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine at the Skirball Institute, New York, NY; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland; Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: olli.silvennoinen@uta.fi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Janus kinases (JAKs; JAK1 to JAK3 and tyrosine kinase 2) mediate cytokine signals in the regulation of hematopoiesis and immunity. JAK2 clinical mutations cause myeloproliferative neoplasms and leukemia, and the mutations strongly concentrate in the regulatory pseudokinase domain Janus kinase homology (JH) 2. Current clinical JAK inhibitors target the tyrosine kinase domain and lack mutation and pathway selectivity. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize mechanisms and differences for pathogenic and cytokine-induced JAK2 activation to enable design of novel selective JAK inhibitors. METHODS: We performed a systematic analysis of JAK2 activation requirements using structure-guided mutagenesis, cell-signaling assays, microscopy, and biochemical analysis. RESULTS: Distinct structural requirements were identified for activation of different pathogenic mutations. Specifically, the predominant JAK2 mutation, V617F, is the most sensitive to structural perturbations in multiple JH2 elements (C helix [αC], Src homology 2-JH2 linker, and ATP binding site). In contrast, activation of K539L is resistant to most perturbations. Normal cytokine signaling shows distinct differences in activation requirements: JH2 ATP binding site mutations have only a minor effect on signaling, whereas JH2 αC mutations reduce homomeric (JAK2-JAK2) erythropoietin signaling and almost completely abrogate heteromeric (JAK2-JAK1) IFN-γ signaling, potentially by disrupting a dimerization interface on JH2. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that therapeutic approaches targeting the JH2 ATP binding site and αC could be effective in inhibiting most pathogenic mutations. JH2 ATP site targeting has the potential for reduced side effects by retaining erythropoietin and IFN-γ functions. Simultaneously, however, we identified the JH2 αC interface as a potential target for pathway-selective JAK inhibitors in patients with diseases with unmutated JAK2, thus providing new insights into the development of novel pharmacologic interventions.
BACKGROUND: Janus kinases (JAKs; JAK1 to JAK3 and tyrosine kinase 2) mediate cytokine signals in the regulation of hematopoiesis and immunity. JAK2 clinical mutations cause myeloproliferative neoplasms and leukemia, and the mutations strongly concentrate in the regulatory pseudokinase domain Janus kinase homology (JH) 2. Current clinical JAK inhibitors target the tyrosine kinase domain and lack mutation and pathway selectivity. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize mechanisms and differences for pathogenic and cytokine-induced JAK2 activation to enable design of novel selective JAK inhibitors. METHODS: We performed a systematic analysis of JAK2 activation requirements using structure-guided mutagenesis, cell-signaling assays, microscopy, and biochemical analysis. RESULTS: Distinct structural requirements were identified for activation of different pathogenic mutations. Specifically, the predominant JAK2 mutation, V617F, is the most sensitive to structural perturbations in multiple JH2 elements (C helix [αC], Src homology 2-JH2 linker, and ATP binding site). In contrast, activation of K539L is resistant to most perturbations. Normal cytokine signaling shows distinct differences in activation requirements: JH2ATP binding site mutations have only a minor effect on signaling, whereas JH2 αC mutations reduce homomeric (JAK2-JAK2) erythropoietin signaling and almost completely abrogate heteromeric (JAK2-JAK1) IFN-γ signaling, potentially by disrupting a dimerization interface on JH2. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that therapeutic approaches targeting the JH2ATP binding site and αC could be effective in inhibiting most pathogenic mutations. JH2ATP site targeting has the potential for reduced side effects by retaining erythropoietin and IFN-γ functions. Simultaneously, however, we identified the JH2 αC interface as a potential target for pathway-selective JAK inhibitors in patients with diseases with unmutated JAK2, thus providing new insights into the development of novel pharmacologic interventions.
Authors: Chloé James; Valérie Ugo; Jean-Pierre Le Couédic; Judith Staerk; François Delhommeau; Catherine Lacout; Loïc Garçon; Hana Raslova; Roland Berger; Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli; Jean Luc Villeval; Stefan N Constantinescu; Nicole Casadevall; William Vainchenker Journal: Nature Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ross L Levine; Martha Wadleigh; Jan Cools; Benjamin L Ebert; Gerlinde Wernig; Brian J P Huntly; Titus J Boggon; Iwona Wlodarska; Jennifer J Clark; Sandra Moore; Jennifer Adelsperger; Sumin Koo; Jeffrey C Lee; Stacey Gabriel; Thomas Mercher; Alan D'Andrea; Stefan Fröhling; Konstanze Döhner; Peter Marynen; Peter Vandenberghe; Ruben A Mesa; Ayalew Tefferi; James D Griffin; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Stephanie J Lee; D Gary Gilliland Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: E Joanna Baxter; Linda M Scott; Peter J Campbell; Clare East; Nasios Fourouclas; Soheila Swanton; George S Vassiliou; Anthony J Bench; Elaine M Boyd; Natasha Curtin; Mike A Scott; Wendy N Erber; Anthony R Green Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Mar 19-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert Kralovics; Francesco Passamonti; Andreas S Buser; Soon-Siong Teo; Ralph Tiedt; Jakob R Passweg; Andre Tichelli; Mario Cazzola; Radek C Skoda Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kunihiro Yamaoka; Pipsa Saharinen; Marko Pesu; Vance E T Holt; Olli Silvennoinen; John J O'Shea Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2004-11-30 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Stephan Wilmes; Maximillian Hafer; Joni Vuorio; Julie A Tucker; Hauke Winkelmann; Sara Löchte; Tess A Stanly; Katiuska D Pulgar Prieto; Chetan Poojari; Vivek Sharma; Christian P Richter; Rainer Kurre; Stevan R Hubbard; K Christopher Garcia; Ignacio Moraga; Ilpo Vattulainen; Ian S Hitchcock; Jacob Piehler Journal: Science Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ana S Newton; Maria-Elena Liosi; Sean P Henry; Luca Deiana; John C Faver; Stefan G Krimmer; David E Puleo; Joseph Schlessinger; William L Jorgensen Journal: Tetrahedron Lett Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 2.032
Authors: Charlotte Ej Downes; Barbara J McClure; Daniel P McDougal; Susan L Heatley; John B Bruning; Daniel Thomas; David T Yeung; Deborah L White Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2022-07-12