Literature DB >> 26340798

[Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation. Do we still need it and if so when?].

M Russ1.   

Abstract

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation was for a long time considered to be an indispensable standard for support of drug therapy for all forms of acute left-sided cardiac failure and especially in cardiogenic shock due to infarction. The advantages of the system seemed to be obvious; however, many of the postulated effects on the hemodynamics, microcirculation and coronary perfusion could not be confirmed later in prospective studies. It was found that IABP had no influence on microcirculation disorders in cardiogenic shock due to infarction. In a meta-analysis on the application for acute myocardial infarction without shock, no effect was found on mortality. The benefit as adjunct therapy for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in cardiogenic shock due to infarction places a question mark over both IABP-SHOCK studies; however, in constellations without PCI the additional benefit of IABP cannot be excluded which is why the procedure could be an option in this situation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamics; Mortality; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Shock, cardiogenic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26340798     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-015-0064-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  24 in total

1.  Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation and microcirculation in cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an IABP-SHOCK II substudy.

Authors:  Christian Jung; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Ingo Eitel; Steffen Desch; Gerhard Schuler; Hans R Figulla; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: prognostic impact of cytokines: INF-γ, TNF-α, MIP-1β, G-CSF, and MCP-1β.

Authors:  R Prondzinsky; S Unverzagt; H Lemm; N Wegener; K Heinroth; U Buerke; M Fiedler; J Thiery; J Haerting; K Werdan; M Buerke
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Antoinette de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Bernward Lauer; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Karl Werdan; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Outcomes with invasive vs conservative management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Navdeep Gupta; Yu Guo; Anuradha Lala; Leora Balsam; Robert O Roswell; Alex Reyentovich; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve survival in myocardial infarction complicated by hypotension and suspected cardiogenic shock or heart failure: results of the TACTICS Trial.

Authors:  E Magnus Ohman; John Nanas; Robert J Stomel; Massoud A Leesar; Dennis W T Nielsen; Daniel O'Dea; Felix J Rogers; Daniel Harber; Michael P Hudson; Elizabeth Fraulo; Linda K Shaw; Kerry L Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment: a German-Austrian S3 Guideline.

Authors:  Karl Werdan; Martin Ruß; Michael Buerke; Georg Delle-Karth; Alexander Geppert; Friedrich A Schöndube
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.

Authors:  Roland Prondzinsky; Henning Lemm; Michael Swyter; Nikolas Wegener; Susanne Unverzagt; Justin M Carter; Martin Russ; Axel Schlitt; Ute Buerke; Arnd Christoph; Hendrik Schmidt; Matthias Winkler; Joachim Thiery; Karl Werdan; Michael Buerke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.

Authors:  Enrico Romagnoli; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Alessandro Sciahbasi; Luigi Politi; Stefano Rigattieri; Gianluca Pendenza; Francesco Summaria; Roberto Patrizi; Ambra Borghi; Cristian Di Russo; Claudio Moretti; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Paolo Loschiavo; Ernesto Lioy; Imad Sheiban; Giuseppe Sangiorgi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.