OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe self-reported barriers to professional help seeking among college students who are at elevated suicide risk and determine if these barriers vary by demographic and clinical characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 165 non-treatment seekers recruited as part of a Web-based treatment linkage intervention for college students at elevated suicide risk (from September 2010 through December 2011). METHODS: Data were collected using Web-based questionnaires. Two coders coded students' responses to an open-ended question about reasons for not seeking professional help. RESULTS: The most commonly reported barriers included perception that treatment is not needed (66%), lack of time (26.8%), and preference for self-management (18%). Stigma was mentioned by only 12% of students. There were notable differences based on gender, race, and severity of depression and alcohol abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts aimed at reaching students at elevated risk for suicidal behavior should be particularly sensitive to these commonly described barriers.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe self-reported barriers to professional help seeking among college students who are at elevated suicide risk and determine if these barriers vary by demographic and clinical characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 165 non-treatment seekers recruited as part of a Web-based treatment linkage intervention for college students at elevated suicide risk (from September 2010 through December 2011). METHODS: Data were collected using Web-based questionnaires. Two coders coded students' responses to an open-ended question about reasons for not seeking professional help. RESULTS: The most commonly reported barriers included perception that treatment is not needed (66%), lack of time (26.8%), and preference for self-management (18%). Stigma was mentioned by only 12% of students. There were notable differences based on gender, race, and severity of depression and alcohol abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts aimed at reaching students at elevated risk for suicidal behavior should be particularly sensitive to these commonly described barriers.
Authors: Cheryl A King; Daniel Eisenberg; Kai Zheng; Ewa Czyz; Anne Kramer; Adam Horwitz; Stephen Chermack Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2015-02-16
Authors: Megan E Patrick; Jeffrey A Boatman; Nicole Morrell; Anna C Wagner; Grace R Lyden; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Cheryl A King; Erin E Bonar; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer; David M Vock; Daniel Almirall Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Andrea E Kass; Katherine N Balantekin; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Corinna Jacobi; Denise E Wilfley; C Barr Taylor Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Sarah Kamens; Larry Davidson; Emily Hyun; Nev Jones; Jill Morawski; Matthew Kurtz; Jessica Pollard; Gerrit Ian van Schalkwyk; Vinod Srihari Journal: Psychosis Date: 2018-10-25
Authors: Anne E Rhodes; Michael H Boyle; Jeffrey A Bridge; Mark Sinyor; Paul S Links; Lil Tonmyr; Robin Skinner; Jennifer M Bethell; Corine Carlisle; Sarah Goodday; Travis Salway Hottes; Amanda Newton; Kathryn Bennett; Purnima Sundar; Amy H Cheung; Peter Szatmari Journal: World J Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-22
Authors: John Torous; Mark E Larsen; Colin Depp; Theodore D Cosco; Ian Barnett; Matthew K Nock; Joe Firth Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Adam G Horwitz; Taylor McGuire; Danielle R Busby; Daniel Eisenberg; Kai Zheng; Jacqueline Pistorello; Ronald Albucher; William Coryell; Cheryl A King Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 4.839