Literature DB >> 17388181

Temporal response of medical liquid crystal displays.

Hongye Liang1, Aldo Badano.   

Abstract

Displays based on liquid crystal technology suffer from slow temporal response due to the dynamics of the molecular rearrangement in response to a pixel voltage change. A slow display can affect the visualization by the human observer of subtle contrast in dynamic presentation of volumetric image datasets or real-time image sequences. In this paper, we describe a measurement method for the characterization of the temporal response of medical liquid crystal displays (LCDs). The ratio of luminance difference to noise at the gray levels of concern determines the reliability of measurements. Coefficients of variations are used to represent the measurement reliability. We optimized the repeatability of most response time measurements to less than 10%. However, poor repeatability is encountered for the response of adjacent gray levels. 256 X 255 inter-gray-level transition time matrices were measured for four medical displays and one high-definition TV LCD display. Response times range from below 20 ms to above 150 ms. For each display, response times are not uniformly distributed, with a faster response for large gray-level transitions. Transition times are smaller when the starting gray level is between 10 and 20 for a target between 25 and 150. The difference could be over 100 ms for different transitions within a display. For transitions with poor temporal response, the luminance after 1, 3, and 5 frames reaches only 12, 45, and 75% of the target value, respectively. We also found that LCD response time depends on temperature, with 1 h warm-up reducing the response time by a factor of 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17388181     DOI: 10.1118/1.2428403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  An evaluation of organic light emitting diode monitors for medical applications: great timing, but luminance artifacts.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Christopher Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Misspecifications of stimulus presentation durations in experimental psychology: a systematic review of the psychophysics literature.

Authors:  Tobias Elze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The (un)suitability of modern liquid crystal displays (LCDs) for vision research.

Authors:  Masoud Ghodrati; Adam P Morris; Nicholas Seow Chiang Price
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23

4.  Temporal properties of liquid crystal displays: implications for vision science experiments.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Thomas G Tanner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.