Literature DB >> 24005283

Predictive modeling by the cerebellum improves proprioception.

Nasir H Bhanpuri1, Allison M Okamura, Amy J Bastian.   

Abstract

Because sensation is delayed, real-time movement control requires not just sensing, but also predicting limb position, a function hypothesized for the cerebellum. Such cerebellar predictions could contribute to perception of limb position (i.e., proprioception), particularly when a person actively moves the limb. Here we show that human cerebellar patients have proprioceptive deficits compared with controls during active movement, but not when the arm is moved passively. Furthermore, when healthy subjects move in a force field with unpredictable dynamics, they have active proprioceptive deficits similar to cerebellar patients. Therefore, muscle activity alone is likely insufficient to enhance proprioception and predictability (i.e., an internal model of the body and environment) is important for active movement to benefit proprioception. We conclude that cerebellar patients have an active proprioceptive deficit consistent with disrupted movement prediction rather than an inability to generally enhance peripheral proprioceptive signals during action and suggest that active proprioceptive deficits should be considered a fundamental cerebellar impairment of clinical importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24005283      PMCID: PMC3761044          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Coordination of multi-joint arm movements in cerebellar ataxia: analysis of hand and angular kinematics.

Authors:  H Topka; J Konczak; J Dichgans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation.

Authors:  S V Adamovich; M B Berkinblit; O Fookson; H Poizner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Clinical and molecular genetic study in seven Japanese families with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6.

Authors:  Y Nagai; T Azuma; M Funauchi; M Fujita; M Umi; M Hirano; T Matsubara; S Ueno
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Active force perception depends on cerebellar function.

Authors:  Nasir H Bhanpuri; Allison M Okamura; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: genotype and phenotype in German kindreds.

Authors:  L Schöls; R Krüger; G Amoiridis; H Przuntek; J T Epplen; O Riess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans.

Authors:  Minnan Xu-Wilson; Haiyin Chen-Harris; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one's behavior.

Authors:  Matthis Synofzik; Axel Lindner; Peter Thier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  49 in total

1.  Cutaneous reflex modulation and self-induced reflex attenuation in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Frank Van Calenbergh; Stephan P Swinnen; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Split-belt walking adaptation recalibrates sensorimotor estimates of leg speed but not position or force.

Authors:  Alejandro Vazquez; Matthew A Statton; Stefanie A Busgang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The cerebellum contributes to proprioception during motion.

Authors:  Heidi M Weeks; Amanda S Therrien; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Proprioception in motor learning: lessons from a deafferented subject.

Authors:  N Yousif; J Cole; J Rothwell; J Diedrichsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Trial-by-Trial Motor Cortical Correlates of a Rapidly Adapting Visuomotor Internal Model.

Authors:  Sergey D Stavisky; Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Skilled forelimb movements and internal copy motor circuits.

Authors:  Eiman Azim; Bror Alstermark
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Role of digit placement control in sensorimotor transformations for dexterous manipulation.

Authors:  Daisuke Shibata; Marco Santello
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of hip abduction and adduction accuracy on post-stroke gait.

Authors:  Jesse C Dean; Aaron E Embry; Katy H Stimpson; Lindsay A Perry; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Predicting and correcting ataxia using a model of cerebellar function.

Authors:  Nasir H Bhanpuri; Allison M Okamura; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The neural circuits recruited for the production of signs and fingerspelled words.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Sonya Mehta; Stephen McCullough; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.