Literature DB >> 24005195

High prevalence of pseudotumors in patients with a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing prosthesis: a prospective cohort study of one hundred and twenty-nine patients.

R Bisschop1, M F Boomsma, J J A M Van Raay, A T M G Tiebosch, M Maas, C L E Gerritsma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, concern has emerged about pseudotumors (lesions that are neither malignant nor infective in the soft tissues surrounding total hip arthroplasty components) after hip arthroplasties with metal-on-metal bearings. Patients treated in our hospital for degenerative arthritis of the hip with a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) prosthesis were invited to return for follow-up evaluation. The prevalence and clinical relevance of pseudotumors were investigated. Risk factors for pseudotumor formation were sought.
METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional prospective cohort study was conducted and included all patients who received a BHR from 2005 to 2010 in Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands. Data were collected on patient and surgical characteristics, clinical hip outcome scores (Harris hip score and Oxford score), serum metal ion levels (cobalt and chromium), and radiographs. A computed tomographic scan (without metal suppression) was made. In patients who had a revision, tissue samples were histologically examined.
RESULTS: Originally, there were 129 patients with 149 BHRs. Four patients (six hips; 4%) were lost to follow-up. Our final cohort consisted of 125 patients (143 hips). From this final cohort, eleven patients (twelve hips) had a revision, and three of them (three hips) had the revision before the present study was conducted. Seven patients (eight hips; 5.6%) had a revision because of a symptomatic pseudotumor. Survival analysis showed an implant survival rate of 87.5% at five years (failure was defined as a revision for any reason). A pseudotumor was found on computed tomography in thirty-nine patients (forty hips; 28%). Of those patients, ten (eleven hips; 28%) had complaints involving groin pain and discomfort, a noticeable mass, or paresthesia. Symptomatic pseudotumors were significantly larger than asymptomatic pseudotumors (a mean volume of 53.3 cm3 compared with 16.3 cm3; p = 0.05). A serum cobalt level of >85 nmol/L was a predictor for pseudotumor formation (odds ratio, 4.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Pseudotumor formation occurred in 28% of hips after an average follow-up of forty-one months. Most pseudotumors (72.5%) were asymptomatic. Larger pseudotumors were associated with more complaints. Survival analysis showed an implant survival of 87.5% at five years. Failure occurred in 5.6% (eight) of 143 hips because of a symptomatic pseudotumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24005195     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  36 in total

1.  Development and first validation of a simplified CT-based classification system of soft tissue changes in large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacement: intra- and interrater reliability and association with revision rates in a uniform cohort of 664 arthroplasties.

Authors:  Martijn F Boomsma; Mireille A Edens; Christiaan P Van Lingen; Niek Warringa; Harmen B Ettema; Cees C P M Verheyen; Mario Maas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Reply to comments on Reito et al.: Repeated metal ion measurements in patients with high risk metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Teemu Moilanen; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Repeated metal ion measurements in patients with high risk metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Teemu Moilanen; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing at ten years: role of routine whole blood metal ion measurements in screening for pseudotumours.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Petra Elo; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Robert L Barrack; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Pleomorphic clinical spectrum of metallosis in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Pisanu; Carlo Doria; Matteo Andreozzi; Marco Bartoli; Laura Saderi; Giovanni Sotgiu; Paolo Tranquilli Leali
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: for artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar.

Authors:  Kai Roman Laukamp; Simon Lennartz; Victor-Frederic Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp; Robert Rau; Markus Le Blanc; Nuran Abdullayev; Anastasios Mpotsaris; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  What Is the Clinical Presentation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Vincent P Galea; Inari Laaksonen; James W Connelly; Sean J Matuszak; Marc Nortje; Rami Madanat; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?

Authors:  Isabelle Catelas; Eric A Lehoux; Ian Hurda; Stephen J Baskey; Luca Gala; Ryan Foster; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Do retrieval analysis and blood metal measurements contribute to our understanding of adverse local tissue reactions?

Authors:  Patricia A Campbell; Michael S Kung; Andrew R Hsu; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.