| Literature DB >> 24004479 |
Billy Sperlich1, Dennis-Peter Born, Mikael Swarén, Yvonne Kilian, Björn Geesmann, Matthias Kohl-Bareis, Hans-Christer Holmberg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined the effects of different levels of compression (0, 20 and 40 mmHg) produced by leg garments on selected psycho-physiological measures of performance while exposed to passive vibration (60 Hz, amplitude 4-6 mm) and performing 3-min of alpine skiing tuck position.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24004479 PMCID: PMC3846678 DOI: 10.1186/2052-1847-5-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil ISSN: 2052-1847
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the experimental design, indicating the time-points at which measurements were performed prior to, during and after taking the tuck position with vibration and different levels of compression (0, 20 and 40 mmHg). NIRS = near-infrared spectroscopy, HR = heart rate, EMG = electromyography, Fisomax = maximal isometric force, Lac = blood level of lactate, RPE = rating of perceived exertion, BP = blood pressure.
The levels of compression (mean ± SD) during preliminary (n = 7) and laboratory testing (n = 12)
| Calf [mmHg] | 13.5 ± 0.7 | 19.7 ± 3.7 | 39.5 ± 3.5 |
| Thigh [mmHg] | 11.4 ± 2.5 | 17.8 ± 1.9 | 34.0 ± 2.6 |
Leg extension and flexion, jumping performance and balance (means ± SD) prior to (pre) and following (post) 3 min in the downhill tuck position with vibration and different levels of compression
| Leg extension | Fmax [N] | 0 | 501 ± 135 | 479 ± 96 | >0.05 | 0.18 |
| 20 | 489 ± 104 | 482 ± 96 | 0.06 | |||
| 40 | 496 ± 90 | 486 ± 109 | 0.10 | |||
| Rate of force development [N·s-1] | 0 | 1480 ± 485 | 1340 ± 571 | >0.05 | 0.26 | |
| 20 | 1500 ± 475 | 1380 ± 608 | 0.23 | |||
| 40 | 1500 ± 647 | 1560 ± 673 | 0.08 | |||
| Leg flexion | Fmax [N] | 0 | 221 ± 48 | 212 ± 24 | >0.05 | 0.23 |
| 20 | 208 ± 34 | 197 ± 41 | 0.37 | |||
| 40 | 197 ± 28 | 191 ± 32 | 0.19 | |||
| Rate of force development [N·s-1] | 0 | 438 ± 102 | 351 ± 120 | >0.05 | 0.78 | |
| 20 | 440 ± 170 | 374 ± 94 | 0.60 | |||
| 40 | 467 ± 109 | 395 ± 137 | 0.58 | |||
| Counter movement jump [cm] | 0 | 36.7 ± 5.9 | 35.8 ± 7.2 | >0.05 | 0.13 | |
| 20 | 36.4 ± 5.4 | 35.6 ± 6.0 | 0.14 | |||
| 40 | 36.1 ± 6.4 | 37.1 ± 7.2 | 0.14 | |||
| Balance time [s] | 0 | 25.7 ± 21.6 | 27.4 ± 20.4 | >0.05 | 0.08 | |
| 20 | 26.0 ± 19.4 | 25.9 ± 16.3 | 0.00 | |||
| 40 | 17.9 ± 12.1 | 22.1 ± 16.35 | 0.29 | |||
Knee angles, absolute and integrated acceleration of the thigh muscles, and relative differences in EMG activation (means ± SD) during the first 30 s of the 3-min period in the downhill tuck position with vibration and different levels of compression
| Knee angle [°] | 0 | 123.9 ± 10.6a,b | 123.0 ± 13.3a,b | 121.2 ± 14.1a,b |
| 20 | 113.1 ± 8.3 | 113.0 ± 7.5 | 110.4 ± 9.2 | |
| 40 | 111.6 ± 9.2 | 110.4 ± 11.1 | 109.5 ± 12.5 | |
| Acceleration [g] | 0 | 0.89 ± 0.29 | 0.95 ± 0.44b | 0.98 ± 0.33b |
| 20 | 0.89 ± 0.37 | 0.85 ± 0.38 | 0.78 ± 0.41 | |
| 40 | 0.84 ± 0.29 | 0.79 ± 0.24 | 0.73 ± 0.16 | |
| Integrated acceleration [g·s] | 0 | 26.7 ± 8.6 | 28.3 ± 13.1a | 29.2 ± 15.8a,b |
| 20 | 26.7 ± 11.1 | 25.5 ± 11.3 | 23.1 ± 12.1 | |
| 40 | 25.1 ± 8.6 | 23.7 ± 7.3 | 22.0 ± 4.8 | |
| EMG [% MVC] of the muscle | | | | |
| Tibialis anterior | 0 | 75.9 ± 38.03 | 67.9 ± 40.2a | 89.3 ± 75.5a,b |
| 20 | 69.4 ± 27.2 | 83.3 ± 71.5 | 125.6 ± 133.5 | |
| 40 | 82.1 ± 27.5 | 100.8 ± 92.3 | 112.0 ± 55.9 | |
| Gastrocnemius medialis | 0 | 92.7 ± 18.1 | 83.2 ± 16.1 | 90.3 ± 15.1b |
| 20 | 95.9 ± 14.5 | 95.3 ± 24.3 | 95.0 ± 23.1 | |
| 40 | 89.4 ± 19.4 | 96.2 ± 25.8 | 106.4 ± 29.3 | |
| Rectus femoris | 0 | 106.7 ± 17.8 | 114.4 ± 22.9b | 136.5 ± 39.4a,b |
| 20 | 105.7 ± 23.9 | 120.6 ± 26.3 | 151.1 ± 43.6 | |
| 40 | 107.5 ± 16.8 | 144.6 ± 64.0 | 178.8 ± 92.2 | |
| Vastus lateralis | 0 | 99.8 ± 6.3 | 101.2 ± 9.62 | 118.7 ± 27.2 |
| 20 | 98.0 ± 4.2 | 103.7 ± 12.3 | 123.4 ± 23.4 | |
| 40 | 100.0 ± 4.0 | 106.9 ± 15.8 | 125.2 ± 23.9 | |
| Vastus medialis | 0 | 101.3 ± 17.6 | 89.7 ± 20.5 | 100.7 ± 26.3a,b |
| 20 | 93.3 ± 5.8 | 96.7 ± 12.8 | 112.5 ± 26.6 | |
| 40 | 95.3 ± 7.3 | 99.2 ± 11.9 | 116.2 ± 20.6 | |
| Biceps femoris | 0 | 90.2 ± 19.7 | 82.9 ± 16.2 | 97.2 ± 21.4 |
| 20 | 89.3 ± 11.2 | 89.2 ± 19.1 | 104.3 ± 28.1 | |
| 40 | 93.0 ± 14.8 | 92.2 ± 21.8 | 106.4 ± 33.9 | |
| Gluteus maximus | 0 | 101.5 ± 16.0a,b | 140.5 ± 80.2 | 165.8 ± 129.1a,b |
| 20 | 111.6 ± 12.5 | 133.3 ± 43.7 | 134.0 ± 63.3 | |
| 40 | 114.0 ± 22.8 | 132.7 ± 52.5 | 134.0 ± 133.0 | |
aP < 0.05 in comparison to the corresponding value with 20 mmHg.
bP < 0.05 in comparison to the corresponding value with 40 mmHg.
Figure 2Mean change (n = 12) in the total hemoglobin concentration and tissue saturation index prior to, during and following 3 min in the downhill tuck position with vibration and different levels of compression. For the sake of clarity, we have not illustrated the standard deviations, which were at similar magnitudes with all clothing. The arrows indicate the time-points at which the data collected was subjected to statistical analysis.
Figure 3Oxygen uptake, the respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute ventilation and breathing frequency prior to, during and following 3 min in the downhill tuck position with vibration and different levels of compression. Mean values and SDs (n = 12) are shown.
Blood lactate concentration, heart rate and perceived exertion (means ± SD) prior to, during and following the 3-min period in the downhill tuck position with vibration and different levels of compression
| | | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood lactate concentration [mmol·L-1] | 0 | 1.25 ± 0.33 | | | | 2.80 ± 0.67 | 4.37 ± 1.02 | 4.68 ± 1.34 | | 4.39 ± 1.33 |
| 20 | 1.32 ± 0.22 | | not determined | | 2.60 ± 0.47 | 4.04 ± 0.77 | 4.46 ± 1.00 | | 4.19 ± 1.12 | |
| 40 | 1.22 ± 0.24 | | | | 3.06 ± 0.63 | 4.11 ± 0.75 | 4.70 ± 1.36 | | 4.31 ± 1.26 | |
| Heart rate [beats · min-1] | 0 | 78 ± 9 | 123 ± 18 | 137 ± 25 | 137 ± 26 | | 113 ± 22 | 88 ± 21 | | 78 ± 14 |
| 20 | 77 ± 12 | 126 ± 18 | 140 ± 21 | 142 ± 23 | | 108 ± 20 | 86 ± 16 | | 79 ± 12 | |
| 40 | 79 ± 11 | 128 ± 21 | 139 ± 25 | 138 ± 26 | | 104 ± 25 | 85 ± 14 | | 78 ± 14 | |
| Rating of perceived exertion [score on Borg’s scale] Whole body | 0 | | | 14.2 ±1.6a,b | | 14.4 ± 1.4 | | 11.5 ± 1.6 | | 9.4 ± 1.8 |
| 20 | | | 12.8 ±1.4 | | 14.5 ±1.7 | | 11.2 ±2.6 | | 9.5 ± 2.2 | |
| 40 | | | 13.4 ±1.5 | | 14.1 ±1.9 | | 11.1 ± 2.5 | | 9.5 ± 2.3 | |
| Thigh | 0 | | | 16.3 ± 1.2a,b | | 17.5 ± 1.6 | | 13.4 ± 2.3 | | 11.6 ± 2.3 |
| 20 | | | 15.5 ± 1.5 | | 17.4 ± 1.8 | | 13.5 ± 2.7 | | 11.8 ± 2.6 | |
| 40 | | | 15.4 ± 1.2 | | 16.9 ± 2.2 | | 13.5 ± 2.6 | | 11.5 ± 2.8 | |
| Calf | 0 | | | 12.8 ± 1.9a,b | | 13.7 ± 2.7 | | 10.6 ± 2.1 | | 9.8 ± 1.9 |
| 20 | | | 11.5 ± 2.1 | | 13.8 ± 1.9 | | 10.9 ± 2.8 | | 8.9 ± 2.5 | |
| 40 | 11.3 ± 2.8 | 12.9 ± 2.9 | 10.4 ± 2.6 | 9.4 ± 1.9 | ||||||
aP < 0.05 in comparison to the corresponding value for 20 mmHg.
bP < 0.05 in comparison to the corresponding value for 40 mmHg.