Literature DB >> 6831192

The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia, and motor function of the hand.

E Moberg.   

Abstract

In reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation work, for decades it has been a basic problem for the author to discover which of the peripheral receptor systems provide the primary information on position, motion and degree of load (proprioception). At one time, joint receptors were accepted as the dominant source and more recently musculocutaneous receptors, whereas little attention has been given to cutaneous factors. A number of clinical observations, however, have indicated the importance of cutaneous afferents and this prompted the present study. There are no means of isolating the joint receptors in order to test them alone, but the fact that very good kinaesthesia can be present in their absence militates against their importance. The cutaneous and musculotendinous factors were therefore studied independently in the forearm and hand in test subjects, partly by means of an extensive nerve blocking technique, but also in experiments of the type devised by Gelfan and Carter (1967). The latter proved to be much less simple than had earlier been claimed. The results of the experiments indicated that no kinaesthetic information reaching conscious level could be shown to arise from the musculocutaneous system, whereas the cutaneous afferents appeared to provide the dominant input. As this system can be readily examined and can be moved surgically to parts in need of proprioception, the practical consequences are obvious. It was also observed that signals arising from skin that is displaced over contracting muscle bellies or moving tendons remote from the activated parts of the limb could constitute an important source of error, overlooked in earlier studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6831192     DOI: 10.1093/brain/106.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  28 in total

1.  Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is there a preferred coordinate system for perception of hand orientation in three-dimensional space?

Authors:  W G Darling; L Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Velocity sensitivity of human muscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  S E Grill; M Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Movement illusions evoked by ensemble cutaneous input from the dorsum of the human hand.

Authors:  D F Collins; A Prochazka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Gating of tactile input from the hand. I. Effects of finger movement.

Authors:  R F Schmidt; W J Schady; H E Torebjörk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Measuring and enhancing proprioception in musicians and dancers.

Authors:  Myrim Sillevis Smitt; H A Bird
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Differences in curvature between constrained and unconstrained goal-directed movements to haptic targets.

Authors:  Marieke C W van der Graaff; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Limb segment inclination sense in proprioception.

Authors:  C J Worringham; G E Stelmach; Z E Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute.

Authors:  W R Ferrell; S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Proportional myoelectric control of a virtual object to investigate human efferent control.

Authors:  Keith E Gordon; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.