Literature DB >> 25136381

When genome integrity and cell cycle decisions collide: roles of polo kinases in cellular adaptation to DNA damage.

Diego Serrano1, Damien D'Amours1.   

Abstract

The drive to proliferate and the need to maintain genome integrity are two of the most powerful forces acting on biological systems. When these forces enter in conflict, such as in the case of cells experiencing DNA damage, feedback mechanisms are activated to ensure that cellular proliferation is stopped and no further damage is introduced while cells repair their chromosomal lesions. In this circumstance, the DNA damage response dominates over the biological drive to proliferate, and may even result in programmed cell death if the damage cannot be repaired efficiently. Interestingly, the drive to proliferate can under specific conditions overcome the DNA damage response and lead to a reactivation of the proliferative program in checkpoint-arrested cells. This phenomenon is known as adaptation to DNA damage and is observed in all eukaryotic species where the process has been studied, including normal and cancer cells in humans. Polo-like kinases (PLKs) are critical regulators of the adaptation response to DNA damage and they play key roles at the interface of cell cycle and checkpoint-related decisions in cells. Here, we review recent progress in defining the specific roles of PLKs in the adaptation process and how this conserved family of eukaryotic kinases can integrate the fundamental need to preserve genomic integrity with effective cellular proliferation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation to checkpoint arrest; Cdc5; DNA damage; Genome integrity; Polo kinases

Year:  2014        PMID: 25136381      PMCID: PMC4127177          DOI: 10.1007/s11693-014-9151-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Synth Biol        ISSN: 1872-5325


  65 in total

1.  Analysis of p53-regulated gene expression patterns using oligonucleotide arrays.

Authors:  R Zhao; K Gish; M Murphy; Y Yin; D Notterman; W H Hoffman; E Tom; D H Mack; A J Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase.

Authors:  Hae Yong Yoo; Akiko Kumagai; Anna Shevchenko; Andrej Shevchenko; William G Dunphy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Michael-Christopher Keogh; Jung-Ae Kim; Michael Downey; Jeffrey Fillingham; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Jacob C Harrison; Megumi Onishi; Nira Datta; Sarah Galicia; Andrew Emili; Judy Lieberman; Xuetong Shen; Stephen Buratowski; James E Haber; Daniel Durocher; Jack F Greenblatt; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Checkpoint adaptation in human cells.

Authors:  R G Syljuåsen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  Polo-like kinases: conservation and divergence in their functions and regulation.

Authors:  Vincent Archambault; David M Glover
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Polo-like kinase 1 phosphorylation of G2 and S-phase-expressed 1 protein is essential for p53 inactivation during G2 checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  X Shawn Liu; Hongchang Li; Bing Song; Xiaoqi Liu
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 7.  Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging.

Authors:  B N Ames; M K Shigenaga; T M Hagen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Adaptation to the ionizing radiation-induced G2 checkpoint occurs in human cells and depends on checkpoint kinase 1 and Polo-like kinase 1 kinases.

Authors:  Randi G Syljuåsen; Sanne Jensen; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  CDC5 inhibits the hyperphosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53, leading to checkpoint adaptation.

Authors:  Genevieve M Vidanes; Frédéric D Sweeney; Sarah Galicia; Stephanie Cheung; John P Doyle; Daniel Durocher; David P Toczyski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase.

Authors:  Moreshwar B Vaze; Achille Pellicioli; Sang Eun Lee; Grzegorz Ira; Giordano Liberi; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Marco Foiani; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  12 in total

1.  MCPH1 is essential for cellular adaptation to the G2-phase decatenation checkpoint.

Authors:  María Arroyo; Ryoko Kuriyama; Israel Guerrero; Daniel Keifenheim; Ana Cañuelo; Jesús Calahorra; Antonio Sánchez; Duncan J Clarke; J Alberto Marchal
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Checkpoint adaptation: Keeping Cdc5 in the T-loop.

Authors:  Diego Serrano; Damien D'Amours
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  A guiding torch at the poles: the multiple roles of spindle microtubule-organizing centers during cell division.

Authors:  Ana M Rincón; Fernando Monje-Casas
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Adaptation to DNA Damage, an Asymptotic Approach for a Cooperative Non-local System.

Authors:  Alexis Léculier; Pierre Roux
Journal:  Acta Appl Math       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 1.563

5.  Reduced kinase activity of polo kinase Cdc5 affects chromosome stability and DNA damage response in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Chetan C Rawal; Sara Riccardo; Chiara Pesenti; Matteo Ferrari; Federica Marini; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Mitotic entry upon Topo II catalytic inhibition is controlled by Chk1 and Plk1.

Authors:  Maria Arroyo; Ana Cañuelo; Jesús Calahorra; Florian D Hastert; Antonio Sánchez; Duncan J Clarke; J Alberto Marchal
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.542

7.  Mitotic entry in the presence of DNA damage is a widespread property of aneuploidy in yeast.

Authors:  Heidi M Blank; Jason M Sheltzer; Colleen M Meehl; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 8.  The danger model approach to the pathogenesis of the rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  César Pacheco-Tena; Susana Aideé González-Chávez
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.818

9.  The CDK-PLK1 axis targets the DNA damage checkpoint sensor protein RAD9 to promote cell proliferation and tolerance to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Takeshi Wakida; Masae Ikura; Kenji Kuriya; Shinji Ito; Yoshiharu Shiroiwa; Toshiyuki Habu; Takuo Kawamoto; Katsuzumi Okumura; Tsuyoshi Ikura; Kanji Furuya
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Slx4 and Rtt107 control checkpoint signalling and DNA resection at double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Diego Dibitetto; Matteo Ferrari; Chetan C Rawal; Attila Balint; TaeHyung Kim; Zhaolei Zhang; Marcus B Smolka; Grant W Brown; Federica Marini; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.