| Literature DB >> 24000992 |
Yasaman Ardeshirpour1, Moinuddin Hassan, Rafal Zielinski, Jason A Horton, Jacek Capala, Amir H Gandjbakhche, Victor Chernomordik.
Abstract
HER2 overexpression and amplification of the HER2/neu gene have been found in approximately 25% of invasive breast carcinomas. They are associated with a poor prognosis and resistance to therapy in breast cancer patients. Up to now, clinical evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is based on ex vivo methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) staining of biopsied tissue). Our goal is to realize "image and treat" paradigm using targeted fluorescent probes to evaluate expression levels of cell biomarkers responsible for cancer progression and to monitor the efficacy of corresponding monoclonal antibody treatments. We used fluorescent Affibody-based probes for in vivo analysis of HER2 receptors using near-infrared optical imaging that do not interfere with binding of the therapeutic agents to these receptors. We have analyzed two types of breast carcinoma xenografts with significant differences in HER2 expression (31 and 21 according to classification) in the mouse model. Using our kinetic model to analyze the temporal variations of the fluorescence intensity in the tumor area after two subsequent injections allowed us to assess quantitatively the difference in HER2 expression levels for two tumor types (BT-474 and MD-MBA-361). This result was substantiated by ELISA ex vivo assays of HER2 expression in the same tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24000992 PMCID: PMC4527379 DOI: 10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1533-0338
Obtained ELISA values for all six mice.
| Carcinoma | Mouse | ELISA (ng/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|
| #1a | 302.1636 | |
| BT-474 | #2a | 261.8253 |
| #3a | 270.1228 | |
| #1b | 84.7655 | |
| MD-MBA-361 | #2b | 89.9211 |
| #3b | 82.6129 |
Figure 1:Fluorescence intensities (tumor – contralateral side) over the observation period of 48 h, including two injection points at times 0 and 24 h: (A) BT-474 and (B) MD-MBA-361.
Figure 2:Fluorescence intensities (contralateral side) over the observation period of 48 h, including two injection points at times 0 and 24 h: (A) BT-474 and (B) MD-MBA-361.
Figure 3:Two examples of the model fitting procedure to evaluate parameters, required for assessment of HER2 expression in the case of carcinoma xenografts of (A) BT-474 and (B) MD-MBA-361.
Derived values of parameters for all six mice, required to solve numerically Equation [5].
| Carcinoma | Mouse | γ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1a | 0.76 | 67500 | 97739 | 59540 | |
| BT-474 | #2a | 1.60 | 62750 | 125277 | 54544 |
| #3a | 1.05 | 54910 | 83698 | 40850 | |
| #1b | 1.20 | 35380 | 55086 | 31000 | |
| MD-MBA-361 | #2b | 1.38 | 31434 | 47639 | 22700 |
| #3b | 1.01 | 25735 | 41112 | 24646 |
Figure 4:Comparison between HER2 expression (a.u.), estimated for individual mice from two injections approach. Average values for carcinoma type subsamples are shown as error crosses.