Literature DB >> 24000298

Results of radical prostatectomy in newly diagnosed prostate cancer: long-term survival rates in locally advanced and high-risk cancers.

Hendrik Isbarn1, Hartwig Huland, Markus Graefen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Until just a few years ago, locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer was generally considered incurable. Recently, however, evidence has accumulated that, even for these patients, the oncologic outcome after radical prostatectomy is not uniformly poor.
METHODS: 13 262 evaluable patients with prostate cancer were treated with radical prostatectomy from 1992 to 2012. 4391 had a locally advanced stage, lymphogenous metastases, and/or unfavorable histopathological tumor characteristics. The endpoints of this retrospective, monocentric study were biochemical recurrence-free survival (postoperative PSA value less than 0.2 ng/mL), carcinoma-specific survival, and overall survival.
RESULTS: The rates of biochemical recurrence-free survival, carcinoma-specific survival, and overall survival at 10 years were 53%, 98%, and 89% for patients with extraprostatic tumor growth (tumor stage pT3a, 2675 patients); 19%, 87%, and 79% for patients with demonstrated invasion of the seminal vesicle (pT3b, 1373 patients); and 3%, 77%, and 69% for patients with tumor invasion of neighboring organs (pT4, 53 patients). The corresponding figures were 14%, 81%, and 71% for patients with lymph node metastases (682 patients); 32%, 93%, and 85% for those with a preoperative PSA value above 20 ng/mL (728 patients); and 25%, 70%, and 58% for those with a prostatectomy Gleason score of 8 or more points (559 patients).
CONCLUSION: Even patients with locally advanced, nodally metastasized, or localized high-risk prostate cancer do not necessarily have a poor outcome. Although most such patients have a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, their carcinoma-specific mortality within ten years of radical prostatectomy ranges from 2% to 30% depending on the risk constellation, while their overall survival rate over the same period ranges from 58% to 89%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24000298      PMCID: PMC3752581          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  23 in total

1.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging.

Authors:  Frederick L Greene
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-07

2.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer].

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Gunna Aus; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Vsevolod B Matveev; Hans Peter Schmid; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.994

4.  Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Andreas Erbersdobler; Thomas Steuber; Andrea Salonia; Eike Currlin; Vincenzo Scattoni; Martin G Friedrich; Thorsten Schlomm; Alexander Haese; Uwe Michl; Renzo Colombo; Hans Heinzer; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Claus G Roehrborn; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Sequential treatment for recurrent localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  H G Van Der Poel; L Moonen; S Horenblas
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Scott E Eggener; Fernando J Bianco; Brett S Carver; Angel Serio; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Hendrik Isbarn; Thorsten Schlomm; Hans Heinzer; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Outcome of prostate cancer patients with initial PSA> or =20 ng/ml undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ulrike Zwergel; Henrik Suttmann; Thomas Schroeder; Stefan Siemer; Bernd Wullich; Joern Kamradt; Jan Lehmann; Michael Stoeckle
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Sooner or later? Outcome analysis of 431 prostate cancer patients treated with postoperative or salvage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Dario Zerini; Andrea Vavassori; Cristiana Fodor; Luigi Santoro; Antonio Minissale; Raffaella Cambria; Federica Cattani; Cristina Garibaldi; Flavia Serafini; Victor Deliu Matei; Ottavio de Cobelli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Improved prostate cancer treatment in certified centers : Is the strategic vision realistic?].

Authors:  J Steffens; J Kranz; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Differential expression of E-cadherin and P-cadherin in pT3 prostate cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological features.

Authors:  Catarina Ferreira; João Lobo; Luís Antunes; Paula Lopes; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  [Social medicine assessment of patients with prostate cancer].

Authors:  W Hoffmann; W Vahlensieck; D-H Zermann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Radical prostatectomy in a certified prostate cancer center: medical treatment and outcome].

Authors:  J Kranz; O Deserno; K Fischer; P Anheuser; B Reisch; J Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Daniel Ringli; Jens Tonhauser; Immanuel Poser; Jürgen Breul; Heidrun Gevensleben; Hans-Helge Seifert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Intermediate-term outcome after PSMA-PET guided high-dose radiotherapy of recurrent high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Zschaeck; Peter Wust; Marcus Beck; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; David Kaul; Julian Rogasch; Volker Budach; Christian Furth; Pirus Ghadjar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.