Literature DB >> 23998976

What is the role of endoscopy and oesophageal biopsies in the management of GERD?

Jens Krugmann1, Helmut Neumann, Michael Vieth, David Armstrong.   

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a diagnosis applicable to "all individuals who are exposed to the risk of physical complications from gastroesophageal reflux, or who experience clinically significant impairment of health related well being (quality of life) due to reflux related symptoms, after adequate reassurance of the benign nature of their symptoms". It remains, predominantly, a symptom-based diagnosis, confirmed clinically by a response to acid suppression therapy although it is accompanied by demonstrable increases in acid exposure on esophageal pH-metry and by endoscopic and histological changes. Standard white light endoscopy permits diagnosis of erosive reflux disease (ERD) which, if present, should be graded for severity using the Los Angeles classification system. However, the role of endoscopy in clinical practice is, primarily, to evaluate patients with persistent symptoms, despite medical therapy, or to investigate alarm features and exclude complications such as Barrett' oesophagus which should be assessed using the Prague C & M criteria. Newer endoscopic techniques allow detection of 'minimal change' GERD lesions and Barrett's oesophagus-associated dysplastic or neoplastic lesions; however, none of the newer techniques has been validated for routine clinical practice. There is an increasing recognition that histology in GERD may provide useful diagnostic information, in part to exclude other lesions, such as eosinophilic oesophagitis, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia or malignancy and, in part, to identify changes, such as basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation and, most recently, dilated intercellular spaces, that are consistent with GERD. However, more widespread incorporation of histology into the clinical management of GERD will require a standardized biopsy protocol and efforts to minimise interobserver differences in the identification of GERD-related histological changes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic techniques; Endoscopy; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Histology; Minimal change esophagitis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23998976     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  10 in total

1.  GERD: A challenge to our view of reflux oesophagitis pathogenesis.

Authors:  André J P M Smout; Albert J Bredenoord
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Prevalence of severe esophagitis in Spain. Results of the PRESS study (Prevalence and Risk factors for Esophagitis in Spain: A cross-sectional study).

Authors:  Núria Piqué; Marta Ponce; Vicente Garrigues; Luis Rodrigo; Félix Calvo; Carlos Martín de Argila; Fernando Borda; Antonio Naranjo; Javier Alcedo; María José Soria; Enrique Rey; Luis Bujanda; Javier P Gisbert; David Suarez; Xavier Calvet; Julio Ponce
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Unique Clinical Features of Los Angeles Grade D Esophagitis Suggest That Factors Other Than Gastroesophageal Reflux Contribute to its Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Anh D Nguyen; Stuart J Spechler; Monique N Shuler; Rhonda F Souza; Kerry B Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Effect of Implementation of Standard Clinical Practice Guideline on Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients in Emergency Department; a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Farhad Heydari; Nasim Golestani; Mehrdad Esmailian
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-01

5.  Surgical techniques to prevent reflux esophagitis in proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by esophagogastrostomy with preservation of the lower esophageal sphincter, pyloric and celiac branches of the vagal nerve, and reconstruction of the new His angle for early proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Thailand guideline 2020 for medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Monthira Maneerattanaporn; Rapat Pittayanon; Tanisa Patcharatrakul; Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul; Siam Sirinthornpanya; Panyavee Pitisuttithum; Asawin Sudcharoen; Uayporn Kaosombatwattana; Kawin Tangvoraphongchai; Reawika Chaikomin; Kamin Harinwan; Karjpong Techathuvanan; Sawangpong Jandee; Phuripong Kijdamrongthum; Anupong Tangaroonsanti; Kulthep Rattanakovit; Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Surapol Surangsrirat; Duangporn Werawatganon; Kitti Chunlertrith; Varocha Mahachai; Somchai Leelakusolvong; Wanich Piyanirun
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.369

7.  Esophageal Epithelial-Derived IL-33 Is Upregulated in Patients with Heartburn.

Authors:  Hiroo Sei; Tadayuki Oshima; Jing Shan; Liping Wu; Takahisa Yamasaki; Takuya Okugawa; Takashi Kondo; Toshihiko Tomita; Hirokazu Fukui; Jiro Watari; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Diagnostic yield of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children with chronic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Ulas Emre Akbulut; Hamdi Cihan Emeksiz; Fatma Gulgun Kocak; Ayten Livaoglu
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  A preliminary report on the use of Midodrine in treating refractory gastroesophageal disease: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kamran Bagheri Lankarani; Gholam Reza Sivandzadeh; Marziyeh Zare; Mohammadali Nejati; Ramin Niknam; Ali Reza Taghavi; Fardad Ejtehadi; Mahvash Alizade Naini; Maryam Moini; Mohammad Hossein Anbardar; Payam Peymani
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-03-19

10.  A Deep Learning Model for Classification of Endoscopic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Chi-Chih Wang; Yu-Ching Chiu; Wei-Liang Chen; Tzu-Wei Yang; Ming-Chang Tsai; Ming-Hseng Tseng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.