Anh D Nguyen1, Stuart J Spechler1,2,3, Monique N Shuler4, Rhonda F Souza1,2,3, Kerry B Dunbar1,3. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. 2. Department of Medicine, Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center and Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute. 3. Department of Medicine, Dallas VA Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dallas, TX. 4. Clinical Informatics, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System, New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Los Angeles (LA) grade of reflux esophagitis (A to D) is assumed to reflect severity of the underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Thus, LA-D esophagitis patients might be expected to have the most conditions predisposing to GERD (eg, obesity, hiatal hernia), and the highest frequency of GERD symptoms. GOALS: The main goal of this study is to compare clinical features of patients with the most severe (LA-D) and mildest (LA-A) grades of esophagitis. STUDY: For this comparative study, we searched our endoscopy database for patients diagnosed with LA-D or LA-A esophagitis, reviewed their endoscopic images, and reviewed medical records of the first 100 we confirmed to have LA-D or LA-A esophagitis. RESULTS: Compared with LA-A patients, LA-D patients were older (mean age, 65±13.4 vs. 56±13.4 y; P<0.001), had lower body mass index (25.9±5.6 vs. 29.4±5.3; P<0.001), were more frequently hospitalized (70% vs. 3%; P<0.001), and in the intensive care unit (15% vs. 0%; P<0.001), and had significantly more serious cardiopulmonary disorders and gastrointestinal bleeding. Conversely, a GERD history was more common in LA-A than LA-D patients (67% vs. 45%; P=0.002). Hiatal hernia was more frequent in LA-A patients than LA-D patients, but not significantly (48% vs. 36%; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: LA-D esophagitis primarily affects hospitalized, older, nonobese patients who often have serious comorbidities, and no history of GERD or hiatal hernia. In contrast, LA-A patients are generally younger, obese outpatients who often have a history of GERD and hiatal hernia without serious comorbidities. These profound differences between LA-A and LA-D patients suggest that factors other than typical GERD contribute to LA-D esophagitis pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND: The Los Angeles (LA) grade of reflux esophagitis (A to D) is assumed to reflect severity of the underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Thus, LA-Desophagitispatients might be expected to have the most conditions predisposing to GERD (eg, obesity, hiatal hernia), and the highest frequency of GERD symptoms. GOALS: The main goal of this study is to compare clinical features of patients with the most severe (LA-D) and mildest (LA-A) grades of esophagitis. STUDY: For this comparative study, we searched our endoscopy database for patients diagnosed with LA-D or LA-A esophagitis, reviewed their endoscopic images, and reviewed medical records of the first 100 we confirmed to have LA-D or LA-A esophagitis. RESULTS: Compared with LA-A patients, LA-Dpatients were older (mean age, 65±13.4 vs. 56±13.4 y; P<0.001), had lower body mass index (25.9±5.6 vs. 29.4±5.3; P<0.001), were more frequently hospitalized (70% vs. 3%; P<0.001), and in the intensive care unit (15% vs. 0%; P<0.001), and had significantly more serious cardiopulmonary disorders and gastrointestinal bleeding. Conversely, a GERD history was more common in LA-A than LA-Dpatients (67% vs. 45%; P=0.002). Hiatal hernia was more frequent in LA-A patients than LA-Dpatients, but not significantly (48% vs. 36%; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS:LA-Desophagitis primarily affects hospitalized, older, nonobese patients who often have serious comorbidities, and no history of GERD or hiatal hernia. In contrast, LA-A patients are generally younger, obese outpatients who often have a history of GERD and hiatal hernia without serious comorbidities. These profound differences between LA-A and LA-Dpatients suggest that factors other than typical GERD contribute to LA-Desophagitis pathogenesis.
Authors: Hang Lak Lee; Chang Soo Eun; Oh Young Lee; Yong Cheol Jeon; Ju Hyun Sohn; Dong Soo Han; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi; Joon Soo Hahm; Min Ho Lee; Dong Hoo Lee Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: L R Lundell; J Dent; J R Bennett; A L Blum; D Armstrong; J P Galmiche; F Johnson; M Hongo; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin Journal: Gut Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Joachim Labenz; Daniel Jaspersen; Michael Kulig; Andreas Leodolter; Tore Lind; Wolfgang Meyer-Sabellek; Manfred Stolte; Micheal Vieth; Stefan Willich; Peter Malfertheiner Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Marianne J Chapman; Robert J L Fraser; Geoffrey Matthews; Antonietta Russo; Max Bellon; Laura K Besanko; Karen L Jones; Ross Butler; Barry Chatterton; Michael Horowitz Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 9.097