INTRODUCTION: Novel error scores and traditional indices of executive function (EF) were related to cardiovascular risk factors measured 10 to 15 years earlier. METHODS: From 1991 to 1995, the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP), a composite score of cardiovascular risk, was ascertained in 1755 Framingham Offspring participants (54% women, mean age=54±9 y). Participants were administered EF tests, which included: FAS and Animals Fluency tests, Trail Making Test B (TrB), and Digit Span-Backwards (DS-B), from 2005 to 2009. Linear and logistic regression were used to relate the FSRP and its components to both error responses and traditional scores. RESULTS: Consistent with previous findings, the FSRP and the individual components, diabetes and sex, were associated with several traditional measures of EF. Of interest were relationships between the FSRP score and TrB Total Errors (P=0.04), DS-B% Total Errors (P=0.02) and DS-B Capacity Score (P=0.03), and prevalent CVD related to making FAS Perseverations in the 75th percentile (P=0.03). By comparison, FSRP and CVD were not related to the traditional DS-B or FAS scores. In addition, age was associated with higher Animals % Total Errors and % Perseverations among ApoE4+ individuals and with higher TrB Total Errors among ApoE4- individuals. CONCLUSIONS: For those middle-aged and healthy, including those who are ApoE4+, cardiovascular risk factors are related to impairments in EF as ascertained by novel errors and traditional measures.
INTRODUCTION: Novel error scores and traditional indices of executive function (EF) were related to cardiovascular risk factors measured 10 to 15 years earlier. METHODS: From 1991 to 1995, the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP), a composite score of cardiovascular risk, was ascertained in 1755 Framingham Offspring participants (54% women, mean age=54±9 y). Participants were administered EF tests, which included: FAS and Animals Fluency tests, Trail Making Test B (TrB), and Digit Span-Backwards (DS-B), from 2005 to 2009. Linear and logistic regression were used to relate the FSRP and its components to both error responses and traditional scores. RESULTS: Consistent with previous findings, the FSRP and the individual components, diabetes and sex, were associated with several traditional measures of EF. Of interest were relationships between the FSRP score and TrB Total Errors (P=0.04), DS-B% Total Errors (P=0.02) and DS-B Capacity Score (P=0.03), and prevalent CVD related to making FAS Perseverations in the 75th percentile (P=0.03). By comparison, FSRP and CVD were not related to the traditional DS-B or FAS scores. In addition, age was associated with higher Animals % Total Errors and % Perseverations among ApoE4+ individuals and with higher TrB Total Errors among ApoE4- individuals. CONCLUSIONS: For those middle-aged and healthy, including those who are ApoE4+, cardiovascular risk factors are related to impairments in EF as ascertained by novel errors and traditional measures.
Authors: M Kivipelto; E L Helkala; M P Laakso; T Hänninen; M Hallikainen; K Alhainen; H Soininen; J Tuomilehto; A Nissinen Journal: BMJ Date: 2001-06-16
Authors: Lisa D Hankee; Sarah R Preis; Alexa S Beiser; Sherral A Devine; Yulin Liu; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: M Kivipelto; E L Helkala; T Hänninen; M P Laakso; M Hallikainen; K Alhainen; H Soininen; J Tuomilehto; A Nissinen Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-06-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Suzanne L Tyas; Lon R White; Helen Petrovitch; G Webster Ross; Daniel J Foley; Harley K Heimovitz; Lenore J Launer Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Rhoda Au; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Merrill Elias; Penelope Elias; Lisa Sullivan; Alexa Beiser; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2004 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Kirby G Parker; Seth T Lirette; David S Deardorff; Lawrence F Bielak; Patricia A Peyser; J Jeffrey Carr; James G Terry; Myriam Fornage; Emelia J Benjamin; Stephen T Turner; Thomas H Mosley; Michael E Griswold; B Gwen Windham Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Apar Gupta; Sarah R Preis; Alexa Beiser; Sherral Devine; Lisa Hankee; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2015 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Daniel K Leibel; Megan R Williams; Leslie I Katzel; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman; Shari R Waldstein Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Vishnu Parthasarathy; Darvis T Frazier; Brianne M Bettcher; Laura Jastrzab; Linda Chao; Bruce Reed; Dan Mungas; Michael Weiner; Charles DeCarli; Helena Chui; Joel H Kramer Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Tatjana Rundek; Hannah Gardener; Anita Seixas Dias Saporta; David A Loewenstein; Ranjan Duara; Clinton B Wright; Chuanhui Dong; Bonnie Levin; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472