BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the joint effect of the APOE epsilon4 allele and midlife systolic blood pressure (SBP) on the risk for poor cognitive function in late life. METHODS: The study includes 3605 surviving members of the cohort of the Japanese-American men followed prospectively over 26 years (1965-1991) as a part of the Honolulu Heart Program. In 1965 men were aged 45 to 68 years and were living in the island of Oahu, Hawaii. For this study the sample was divided into 4 categories: normal SBP (<160 mm Hg)/No epsilon4, as the reference category; normal SBP/epsilon4; high SBP/no epsilon4; high SBP/epsilon4. The relative risk (RR) of late-life intermediate and poor cognitive function relative to good function was measured by the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) test. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, education, smoking, alcohol use, and body mass index, the RR for poor cognitive function (CASI <74) compared with good cognitive function (CASI >/=82) in never-treated subjects was 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.9) for the normal SBP/epsilon4 category, 2.6 (0.7 to 10.0) for the high SBP/no epsilon4, and 13.0 (1.9 to 83.8) for the high SBP/epsilon4. Adjustment for diabetes, prevalent stroke, coronary disease, and ankle-brachial index reduced the RR of poor cognition by 25.5% (RR 13.0 to 10.8) in those with both risk factors. In the treated group, the RR was 1.9 (0.7 to 4.5) for those with both risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that midlife high SBP has a stronger adverse effect on cognitive function in persons with higher genetic susceptibility, but this effect may be modified by antihypertensive treatment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the joint effect of the APOE epsilon4 allele and midlife systolic blood pressure (SBP) on the risk for poor cognitive function in late life. METHODS: The study includes 3605 surviving members of the cohort of the Japanese-American men followed prospectively over 26 years (1965-1991) as a part of the Honolulu Heart Program. In 1965 men were aged 45 to 68 years and were living in the island of Oahu, Hawaii. For this study the sample was divided into 4 categories: normal SBP (<160 mm Hg)/No epsilon4, as the reference category; normal SBP/epsilon4; high SBP/no epsilon4; high SBP/epsilon4. The relative risk (RR) of late-life intermediate and poor cognitive function relative to good function was measured by the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) test. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, education, smoking, alcohol use, and body mass index, the RR for poor cognitive function (CASI <74) compared with good cognitive function (CASI >/=82) in never-treated subjects was 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.9) for the normal SBP/epsilon4 category, 2.6 (0.7 to 10.0) for the high SBP/no epsilon4, and 13.0 (1.9 to 83.8) for the high SBP/epsilon4. Adjustment for diabetes, prevalent stroke, coronary disease, and ankle-brachial index reduced the RR of poor cognition by 25.5% (RR 13.0 to 10.8) in those with both risk factors. In the treated group, the RR was 1.9 (0.7 to 4.5) for those with both risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that midlife high SBP has a stronger adverse effect on cognitive function in persons with higher genetic susceptibility, but this effect may be modified by antihypertensive treatment.
Authors: Arvind Nishtala; Sarah R Preis; Alexa Beiser; Sherral Devine; Lisa Hankee; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2014 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Robert Stewart; Qian-Li Xue; Kamal Masaki; Helen Petrovitch; G Webster Ross; Lon R White; Lenore J Launer Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Terrie Vasilopoulos; William S Kremen; Kathleen Kim; Matthew S Panizzon; Phyllis K Stein; Hong Xian; Michael D Grant; Michael J Lyons; Rosemary Toomey; Lindon J Eaves; Carol E Franz; Kristen C Jacobson Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2011-06-19 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Jessica B S Langbaum; Kewei Chen; Lenore J Launer; Adam S Fleisher; Wendy Lee; Xiaofen Liu; Hillary D Protas; Stephanie A Reeder; Daniel Bandy; Meixiang Yu; Richard J Caselli; Eric M Reiman Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-08-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Jyri J Virta; Kauko Heikkilä; Markus Perola; Markku Koskenvuo; Ismo Räihä; Juha O Rinne; Jaakko Kaprio Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Jaimie C Hunter; Elizabeth P Handing; Ramon Casanova; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Michael W Lutz; Santiago Saldana; Brenda L Plassman; Kathleen M Hayden Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Paul K Crane; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Laura E Gibbons; Dan M Mungas; Sebastien Haneuse; Eric B Larson; Lewis Kuller; Kathleen Hall; Gerald van Belle Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 6.437