Literature DB >> 23993715

Preoperative visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in children with small, partial, or non-central cataracts.

Eileen E Birch1, Vidhya Subramanian, Christina Cheng Patel, David Stager.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While there is clear evidence that dense central cataracts >3 mm diameter warrant prompt intervention to prevent deprivation amblyopia, guidelines for management of small, partial and non-central cataracts are not evidence-based. Consensus guidelines advise managing affected infants and preschool children by monitoring for possible progression in size or density and pharmacologic pupillary dilation, if indicated. Extraction is deemed necessary if the cataract progresses sufficiently to obscure the visual axis or if strabismus or nystagmus develops. We evaluated the long-term visual acuity outcome of the consensus guidelines and whether sensory testing during infancy and early childhood may be helpful in guiding treatment.
METHODS: A total of 40 consecutive children diagnosed with small, partial, or non-central cataracts at 1 week to 2.5 years of age were enrolled in a prospective study of forced-choice preferential looking visual acuity and contrast sensitivity development. Long-term visual acuity outcome was assessed by crowded HOTV or ETDRS at 4-11 years.
RESULTS: Of the 40 children managed by consensus guidelines, 24 (60%) had abnormal visual acuity at 4-11 years of age, including 9 (23%) who had moderate to severe visual impairment (20/80 or worse) in 1 or both eyes. Abnormal visual acuity and contrast sensitivity during development were predictive of abnormal long-term visual acuity outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests were sensitive to the effects of visual deprivation on the developing visual system and may be useful in early identification of children with small, partial, or non-central cataracts who could benefit from cataract extraction.
Copyright © 2013 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23993715      PMCID: PMC3775336          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  24 in total

1.  Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  P S Moke; A H Turpin; R W Beck; J M Holmes; M X Repka; E E Birch; R W Hertle; R T Kraker; J M Miller; C A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  J M Holmes; R W Beck; M X Repka; D A Leske; R T Kraker; R C Blair; P S Moke; E E Birch; R A Saunders; R W Hertle; G E Quinn; K A Simons; J M Miller
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09

3.  A new technique to measure contrast sensitivity in human infants.

Authors:  R J Adams; M E Mercer; M L Courage
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The predictive utility of the Teller acuity cards for assessing visual outcome in children with preterm birth and associated perinatal risks.

Authors:  H L Hall; M L Courage; R J Adams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Congenital and infantile cataract: aetiology and management.

Authors:  Wai H Chan; Susmito Biswas; Jane L Ashworth; I Christopher Lloyd
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Improving the effectiveness of the infant contrast sensitivity card procedure.

Authors:  James R Drover; Avery E Earle; Mary L Courage; Russell J Adams
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Using a single test to measure human contrast sensitivity from early childhood to maturity.

Authors:  Russell J Adams; Mary L Courage
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Outcome after very early treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract.

Authors:  E E Birch; W H Swanson; D R Stager; M Woody; M Everett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Pamela S Moke; Andrew H Turpin; Frederick L Ferris; John Paul SanGiovanni; Chris A Johnson; Eileen E Birch; Danielle L Chandler; Terry A Cox; R Clifford Blair; Raymond T Kraker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Can the visual acuity of infants be predicted from a measurement of contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Russell J Adams; Mary L Courage
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric cataract: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Anagha Medsinge; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-07

2.  Refractive Lens Exchange Surgery in Early-Onset High Myopia Patients With Partial Cataract.

Authors:  Xi-Fang Zhang; Xiao-Xia Li; Chen Xin; Brad Kline; Meng-Tian Kang; Meng Li; Li-Ya Qiao; Ning-Li Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-15

3.  A New Contrast Sensitivity Test for Pediatric Patients: Feasibility and Inter-Examiner Reliability in Ocular Disorders and Cerebral Visual Impairment.

Authors:  D Luisa Mayer; Christopher Patrick Taylor; Barry S Kran
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.