Literature DB >> 11997058

Using a single test to measure human contrast sensitivity from early childhood to maturity.

Russell J Adams1, Mary L Courage.   

Abstract

Despite the emerging scientific and clinical importance of measuring human contrast sensitivity (CS), developmental data are sparse, especially those obtained with a single methodology. We used a new, time-efficient, psychophysical card procedure to evaluate binocular CS in groups of 20 4- to 9-yr-olds and 10 adults. Combined with data from infants and toddlers obtained previously with the same method, our results show that CS is adult-like by 9 years of age. However, the pattern of development is asymmetrical across spatial frequency (SF): Sensitivity at high SF (which is very poor near birth) shows dramatic improvement over the first three years, but sensitivity at low SF shows much more gradual development, a result which may be explained by differences in the maturation of the underlying neural SF channels. Also notable is that the method shows clinical potential due to its relative speed, ease of use, and consistent results across such a broad age range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997058     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00038-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  22 in total

1.  Preoperative visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in children with small, partial, or non-central cataracts.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Vidhya Subramanian; Christina Cheng Patel; David Stager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Contrast sensitivity in 10 year old preterm and full term children: a population based study.

Authors:  E Larsson; A Rydberg; G Holmström
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Micro and regular saccades across the lifespan during a visual search of "Where's Waldo" puzzles.

Authors:  Nicholas L Port; Jane Trimberger; Steve Hitzeman; Bryan Redick; Stephen Beckerman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Evaluating a website to teach children safety with dogs.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Leslie A McClure; Joan Severson
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 5.  Contrast insensitivity: the critical immaturity in infant visual performance.

Authors:  Angela M Brown; Delwin T Lindsey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Neonatal Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity: Basic Psychophysics.

Authors:  Angela M Brown; Faustina Ottie Opoku; Michael R Stenger
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Enhanced integration of motion information in children with autism.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Marc S Tibber; Tony Charman; Steven C Dakin; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Alternative Flicker Glass: A New Anti-Suppression Approach to the Treatment of Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Chengcheng Zhu; Peng Wang; Xiaojun Hu; Wenbo Yao; Xinhui Huang; Bilian Ke
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Visual contrast sensitivity in patients with impairment of functional independence after stroke.

Authors:  Natanael Antonio dos Santos; Suellen Marinho Andrade
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberrations in Keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Einat Shneor; David P Piñero; Ravid Doron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.