BACKGROUND: When activated by the sympathetic nervous system, brown adipose tissue (BAT) increases energy expenditure to produce heat. Augmenting BAT mass or increasing BAT activation could potentially be used to decrease obesity. Noninvasive methods to detect and monitor BAT mass are needed. Contrast ultrasound can estimate BAT blood flow and is able to measure the perfused volume of an organ and thus its mass. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether contrast ultrasound could characterize BAT mass in two mouse models of obesity: wild-type mice fed a high-fat diet and mutant db/db mice. METHODS: Contrast ultrasound of BAT (Definity 2 μL/min; 14-MHz linear probe) was performed before and after stimulation of BAT with norepinephrine (NE). BAT replenishment curves were obtained, and blood flow was estimated by the product of the curve's plateau and slope. Additionally, consecutive two-dimensional images of perfused BAT were acquired at 1-mm intervals after stimulation with NE and used to assess BAT volume and mass. RESULTS: BAT blood flow increased after NE infusion in all mice studied. Blood flow response to NE was similar in wild-type mice fed either a low-fat diet or a high-fat diet. BAT blood flow was lower in db/db mice than in wild-type mice (P = .02). Contrast ultrasound-derived BAT mass was correlated with BAT mass obtained at necropsy (R(2) = 0.83, P < .001). BAT mass was higher in mice fed a high-fat diet than in those fed a low-fat diet. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast ultrasound can be used to estimate BAT mass in mice when BAT vascularization is not significantly impaired. This noninvasive technique may potentially allow the serial evaluation of therapies designed to augment BAT mass.
BACKGROUND: When activated by the sympathetic nervous system, brown adipose tissue (BAT) increases energy expenditure to produce heat. Augmenting BAT mass or increasing BAT activation could potentially be used to decrease obesity. Noninvasive methods to detect and monitor BAT mass are needed. Contrast ultrasound can estimate BAT blood flow and is able to measure the perfused volume of an organ and thus its mass. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether contrast ultrasound could characterize BAT mass in two mouse models of obesity: wild-type mice fed a high-fat diet and mutant db/db mice. METHODS: Contrast ultrasound of BAT (Definity 2 μL/min; 14-MHz linear probe) was performed before and after stimulation of BAT with norepinephrine (NE). BAT replenishment curves were obtained, and blood flow was estimated by the product of the curve's plateau and slope. Additionally, consecutive two-dimensional images of perfused BAT were acquired at 1-mm intervals after stimulation with NE and used to assess BAT volume and mass. RESULTS: BAT blood flow increased after NE infusion in all mice studied. Blood flow response to NE was similar in wild-type mice fed either a low-fat diet or a high-fat diet. BAT blood flow was lower in db/db mice than in wild-type mice (P = .02). Contrast ultrasound-derived BAT mass was correlated with BAT mass obtained at necropsy (R(2) = 0.83, P < .001). BAT mass was higher in mice fed a high-fat diet than in those fed a low-fat diet. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast ultrasound can be used to estimate BAT mass in mice when BAT vascularization is not significantly impaired. This noninvasive technique may potentially allow the serial evaluation of therapies designed to augment BAT mass.
Authors: M Scherrer-Crosbie; R Ullrich; K D Bloch; H Nakajima; B Nasseri; H T Aretz; M L Lindsey; A C Vançon; P L Huang; R T Lee; W M Zapol; M H Picard Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K A Collins; C E Korcarz; S G Shroff; J E Bednarz; R C Fentzke; H Lin; J M Leiden; R M Lang Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: A Fard; C Y Wang; S Takuma; H A Skopicki; D J Pinsky; M R Di Tullio; S Homma Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: M D Feldman; J M Erikson; Y Mao; C E Korcarz; R M Lang; G L Freeman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: R W Grange; A Meeson; E Chin; K S Lau; J T Stull; J M Shelton; R S Williams; D J Garry Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Anna Peeters; Jan J Barendregt; Frans Willekens; Johan P Mackenbach; Abdullah Al Mamun; Luc Bonneux Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Intawat Nookaew; Per-Arne Svensson; Peter Jacobson; Margareta Jernås; Magdalena Taube; Ingrid Larsson; Johanna C Andersson-Assarsson; Lars Sjöström; Philippe Froguel; Andrew Walley; Jens Nielsen; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Srihari C Sampath; Srinath C Sampath; Miriam A Bredella; Aaron M Cypess; Martin Torriani Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Todd Belcik; Brian P Davidson; Ted Foster; Yue Qi; Yan Zhao; Dawn Peters; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Rosa Tamara Branca; Ting He; Le Zhang; Carlos S Floyd; Matthew Freeman; Christian White; Alex Burant Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aidan Flynn; Qian Li; Marcello Panagia; Amr Abdelbaky; Megan MacNabb; Anthony Samir; Aaron M Cypess; Arthur E Weyman; Ahmed Tawakol; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 5.251