Literature DB >> 29543051

Use of serum and peritoneal CEA and CA19-9 in prediction of peritoneal dissemination and survival of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: are they prognostic factors?

M Hasbahceci1, F U Malya2, E Kunduz2, M Guzel2, N Unver3, A Akcakaya2.   

Abstract

Introduction To evaluate the impact of serum and peritoneal levels of tumour markers on peritoneal carcinomatosis and survival in gastric adenocarcinoma. Materials and methods Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were evaluated with regard to serum and peritoneal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9. Numeric values and groupings based on serum and peritoneal cutoff values were used. Development of peritoneal carcinomatosis, including positive washing cytology, was regarded as main outcome. Gastric cancer outcomes as disease free and overall survival were analysed. Results There were 67 patients with a mean age of 60 ± 11 years. Positive peritoneal washing cytology was significantly associated with serum CA19-9 and high serum CA 19-9 group (P = 0.033 and P = 0.011, respectively). High peritoneal CEA was shown to be significantly associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis (P = 0.032). After a median follow up of 17 months, 48 patients (71.7%) were alive. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis showed significant poorer prognosis as shown by overall survival rate of 28.6%. Only serum CEA was significantly associated with lower disease free and overall survival (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). Discussion and conclusion Serum CEA is shown to be significantly associated with poor prognosis for gastric cancer patients. Serum level of CA19-9 and high peritoneal CEA levels are significant predictors for positive peritoneal washing cytology and the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis, respectively. Therefore, the possible impact of serum and peritoneal tumor markers especially on the staging and prognosis of gastric cancer remains to be clarified by future studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA19-9; Carcinoembryonic antigen; Gastric adenocarcinoma; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29543051      PMCID: PMC5958855          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  25 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in peritoneal washes in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  N Abe; T Watanabe; H Toda; H Machida; K Suzuki; T Masaki; T Mori; M Sugiyama; Y Atomi; Y Nakaya
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  CEA and CA 19-9 are still valuable markers for the prognosis of colorectal and gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Abdullah Sisik; Mustafa Kaya; Gurhan Bas; Fatih Basak; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

3.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Clinical significance of carcinoembryonic antigen in peritoneal lavage from patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kengo Kanetaka; Shinichiro Ito; Seiya Susumu; Akira Yoneda; Fumihiko Fujita; Mitsuhisa Takatsuki; Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  CEA/CA72-4 levels in peritoneal lavage fluid are predictive factors in patients with gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Manabu Yamamoto; Keiji Yoshinaga; Ayumi Matsuyama; Shinichi Tsutsui; Teruyoshi Ishida
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Carcinoembryonic antigen levels in peritoneal washings can predict peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Asao; T Fukuda; S Yazawa; Y Nagamachi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 in the sera and peritoneal washing of patients undergoing surgical treatment for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  René Crepaldi-Filho; Rogério Tadeu Palma; Marcelo Franchini Giusti; Marina de Assis Galvão Bueno; Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Silva; Jaques Waisberg
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep

8.  Prognostic significance of tumor markers in peritoneal lavage in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Manabu Yamamoto; Hideo Baba; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Kazuya Endo; Yasuharu Ikeda; Yasushi Toh; Shunji Kohnoe; Takeshi Okamura; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  CA72-4 compared with carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumour marker for gastric cancer.

Authors:  R Hamazoe; M Maeta; T Matsui; S Shibata; S Shiota; N Kaibara
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio and a combination scoring system of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4 levels in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Chan Lee; Se Youl Lee; Chan Young Kim; Doo Hyun Yang
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-11-26
View more
  6 in total

1.  E-Cadherin Protein as a Potential Marker for Gastric Cancer and Its Association with Helicobacter Pylori- Induced Gastritis and Gastric Ulcer.

Authors:  Mustafa Kahtan Al-Bayaty; Salma Abdul-Rudha Abass; Mohammed Faraj Al-Marjani
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-10

2.  The Morphological Analysis of Cells in the Peritoneal Washing Fluids of Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ren-Peng Jiang; Xue-Jiao Xiong; Xue-Shan Qiu; En-Hua Wang; Guang-Ping Wu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Novel Drug Delivery Systems as an Emerging Platform for Stomach Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Umme Hani; Riyaz Ali M Osmani; Sabina Yasmin; B H Jaswanth Gowda; Hissana Ather; Mohammad Yousuf Ansari; Ayesha Siddiqua; Mohammed Ghazwani; Adel Al Fatease; Ali H Alamri; Mohamed Rahamathulla; M Yasmin Begum; Shadma Wahab
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.525

4.  An elevated preoperative serum calcium level is a significant predictor for positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xingchen Li; Yuan Cheng; Yangyang Dong; Boqiang Shen; Xiao Yang; Jiaqi Wang; Jingyi Zhou; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Julita Machlowska; Jacek Baj; Monika Sitarz; Ryszard Maciejewski; Robert Sitarz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Study on the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer by Magnetic Beads Extraction and Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Ning Zhu; Xiaoliang Xing; Limei Cao; Yingjun Zhang; Ti Zhang; Zhen Li; Fen Zou; Qing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.