Literature DB >> 23990119

Comparative evaluation of porous versus nonporous mucoadhesive films as buccal delivery system of glibenclamide.

Ajay Kumar1, Vikas Bali, Manish Kumar, Kamla Pathak.   

Abstract

The present research work focused on the comparative assessment of porous versus nonporous films in order to develop a suitable buccoadhesive device for the delivery of glibenclamide. Both films were prepared by solvent casting technique using the 3(2) full factorial design, developing nine formulations (F1-F9). The films were evaluated for ex vivo mucoadhesive force, ex vivo mucoadhesion time, in vitro drug release (using a modified flow-through drug release apparatus), and ex vivo drug permeation. The mucoadhesive force, mucoadhesion time, swelling index, and tensile strength were observed to be directly proportional to the content of HPMC K4M. The optimized porous film (F4) showed an in vitro drug release of 84.47 ± 0.98%, ex vivo mucoadhesive force of 0.24 ± 0.04 N, and ex vivo mucoadhesion time of 539.11 ± 3.05 min, while the nonporous film (NF4) with the same polymer composition showed a release of 62.66 ± 0.87%, mucoadhesive force of 0.20 ± 0.05 N, and mucoadhesive time of 510 ± 2.00 min. The porous film showed significant differences for drug release and mucoadhesion time (p < 0.05) versus the nonporous film. The mechanism of drug release was observed to follow non-Fickian diffusion (0.1 < n < 0.5) for both porous and nonporous films. Ex vivo permeation studies through chicken buccal mucosa indicated improved drug permeation in porous films versus nonporous films. The present investigation established porous films to be a cost-effective buccoadhesive delivery system of glibenclamide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23990119      PMCID: PMC3840781          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-013-0014-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  15 in total

Review 1.  Manufacture and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films.

Authors:  Javier O Morales; Jason T McConville
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.571

2.  Physico-chemical and bioadhesive properties of polyacrylic acid polymers.

Authors:  S Anlar; Y Capan; A A Hincal
Journal:  Pharmazie       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers.

Authors:  N A Peppas
Journal:  Pharm Acta Helv       Date:  1985

4.  Preparation and evaluation of a novel buccal adhesive system.

Authors:  K Gh Desai; T Mp Kumar
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Formulation, evaluation, and comparison of bilayered and multilayered mucoadhesive buccal devices of propranolol hydrochloride.

Authors:  Vishnu M Patel; Bhupendra G Prajapati; Madhabhai M Patel
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Recent advances in buccal drug delivery and absorption--in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  H E Junginger; J A Hoogstraate; J C Verhoef
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Mucoadhesive buccal patches of miconazole nitrate: in vitro/in vivo performance and effect of ageing.

Authors:  Noha A Nafee; Fatma A Ismail; Nabila A Boraie; Lobna M Mortada
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 5.875

8.  Evaluation of selected polysaccharide excipients in buccoadhesive tablets for sustained release of nicotine.

Authors:  Calum R Park; Dale L Munday
Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Mucoadhesion; A prerequisite or a constraint in nasal drug delivery?

Authors:  Kamla Pathak
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2011-04

10.  Mucoadhesive buccal films of glibenclamide: Development and evaluation.

Authors:  Y Indira Muzib; K Srujana Kumari
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2011-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Localization of fluconazole in oral cavity by preferential coating of buccoadhesive tablet for treatment of oral thrush.

Authors:  Kamla Pathak; Vijay Sharma; Nida Akhtar; Pragya Rastogi
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

2.  Sustained release of linezolid in ocular insert based on lipophilic modified structure of sodium alginate.

Authors:  Ashkan MohammadSadeghi; Fatemeh Farjadian; Shohreh Alipour
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Bucco-Adhesive Film as a Pediatric Proper Dosage Form for Systemic Delivery of Propranolol Hydrochloride: In-vitro and in-vivo Evaluation.

Authors:  Soad A Mohamad; Hesham Salem; Heba A Yassin; Heba F Mansour
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.162

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.