OBJECTIVE: To analyze late urinary toxicity after prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT): symptom description and identification of patient characteristics or treatment parameters allowing for the generation of nomograms. METHODS: Nine hundred and sixty-five patients underwent RT in seventeen French centers for localized prostate cancer. Median total dose was 70 Gy (range, 65-80 Gy), using different fractionations (2 or 2.5 Gy/day) and techniques. Late urinary toxicity and the corresponding symptoms (urinary frequency, incontinence, dysuria/decreased stream, and hematuria) were prospectively assessed in half of the patients using the LENT-SOMA classification. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models addressed patient or treatment-related predictors of late urinary toxicity (≥grade 2). Nomograms were built up, and their performance was assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 61 months. The 5-year (≥grade 2) global urinary toxicity, urinary frequency, hematuria, dysuria, and urinary incontinence rates were 15, 10, 5, 3 and 1 %, respectively. The 5-year (≥grade 3) urinary toxicity rate was 3 %. The following parameters significantly increased the 5-year risk of global urinary toxicity (≥grade 2): anticoagulant treatment (RR = 2.35), total dose (RR = 1.09), and age (RR = 1.06). Urinary frequency was increased by the total dose (RR = 1.07) and diabetes (RR = 4). Hematuria was increased by anticoagulant treatment (RR = 2.9). Dysuria was increased by the total dose (RR = 1.1). Corresponding nomograms and their calibration plots were generated. Nomogram performance should be validated with external data. CONCLUSIONS: The first nomograms to predict late urinary toxicity but also specific urinary symptoms after prostate RT were generated, contributing to prostate cancer treatment decision.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze late urinary toxicity after prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT): symptom description and identification of patient characteristics or treatment parameters allowing for the generation of nomograms. METHODS: Nine hundred and sixty-five patients underwent RT in seventeen French centers for localized prostate cancer. Median total dose was 70 Gy (range, 65-80 Gy), using different fractionations (2 or 2.5 Gy/day) and techniques. Late urinary toxicity and the corresponding symptoms (urinary frequency, incontinence, dysuria/decreased stream, and hematuria) were prospectively assessed in half of the patients using the LENT-SOMA classification. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models addressed patient or treatment-related predictors of late urinary toxicity (≥grade 2). Nomograms were built up, and their performance was assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 61 months. The 5-year (≥grade 2) global urinary toxicity, urinary frequency, hematuria, dysuria, and urinary incontinence rates were 15, 10, 5, 3 and 1 %, respectively. The 5-year (≥grade 3) urinary toxicity rate was 3 %. The following parameters significantly increased the 5-year risk of global urinary toxicity (≥grade 2): anticoagulant treatment (RR = 2.35), total dose (RR = 1.09), and age (RR = 1.06). Urinary frequency was increased by the total dose (RR = 1.07) and diabetes (RR = 4). Hematuria was increased by anticoagulant treatment (RR = 2.9). Dysuria was increased by the total dose (RR = 1.1). Corresponding nomograms and their calibration plots were generated. Nomogram performance should be validated with external data. CONCLUSIONS: The first nomograms to predict late urinary toxicity but also specific urinary symptoms after prostate RT were generated, contributing to prostate cancer treatment decision.
Authors: Riccardo Valdagni; Michael W Kattan; Tiziana Rancati; Changhong Yu; Vittorio Vavassori; Giovanni Fellin; Elena Cagna; Pietro Gabriele; Flora Anna Mauro; Micaela Baccolini; Carla Bianchi; Loris Menegotti; Angelo F Monti; Michele Stasi; Maria Olga Giganti; Claudio Fiorino Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Abrahim Al-Mamgani; Wim L J van Putten; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Geert J L H van Leenders; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Talya Salz; Shrujal S Baxi; Nirupa Raghunathan; Erin E Onstad; Andrew N Freedman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Karyn A Goodman; Christoffer Johansen; Matthew J Matasar; Peter de Nully Brown; Kevin C Oeffinger; Andrew J Vickers Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Marie K Gurka; Leonard N Chen; Aditi Bhagat; Rudy Moures; Joy S Kim; Thomas Yung; Siyuan Lei; Brian T Collins; Pranay Krishnan; Simeng Suy; Anatoly Dritschilo; John H Lynch; Sean P Collins Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Andrew Warner; Tom Pickles; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Luis Souhami; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; George Rodrigues Journal: Cureus Date: 2015-06-11
Authors: Rowan V David; Arman A Kahokehr; Jason Lee; David I Watson; John Leung; Michael E O'Callaghan Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Wouter Schaake; Arjen van der Schaaf; Lisanne V van Dijk; Alfons C M van den Bergh; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marco Marcello; James W Denham; Angel Kennedy; Annette Haworth; Allison Steigler; Peter B Greer; Lois C Holloway; Jason A Dowling; Michael G Jameson; Dale Roach; David J Joseph; Sarah L Gulliford; David P Dearnaley; Matthew R Sydes; Emma Hall; Martin A Ebert Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 6.244