Literature DB >> 18495377

Update of Dutch multicenter dose-escalation trial of radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Abrahim Al-Mamgani1, Wim L J van Putten, Wilma D Heemsbergen, Geert J L H van Leenders, Annerie Slot, Michel F H Dielwart, Luca Incrocci, Joos V Lebesque.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To update the analysis of the Dutch dose-escalation trial of radiotherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 669 patients with localized prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive 68 or 78 Gy. The patients were stratified by age, institution, use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy, and treatment group. The primary endpoint was freedom from failure (FFF), with failure defined as clinical or biochemical failure. Two definitions of biochemical failure were used: the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition (three consecutive increases in prostate-specific antigen level) and the Phoenix definition (nadir plus 2 microe secondary endpoints were freedom from clinical failure, overall survival, and genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 70 months, the FFF using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition was significantly better in the 78-Gy arm than in the 68-Gy arm (7-year FFF rate, 54% vs. 47%, respectively; p = 0.04). The FFF using the Phoenix definition was also significantly better in the 78-Gy arm than in the 68-Gy arm (7-year FFF rate, 56% vs. 45%, respectively; p = 0.03). However, no differences in freedom from clinical failure or overall survival were observed. The incidence of late Grade 2 or greater genitourinary toxicity was similar in both arms (40% and 41% at 7 years; p = 0.6). However, the cumulative incidence of late Grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity was increased in the 78-Gy arm compared with the 68-Gy arm (35% vs. 25% at 7 years; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown a statistically significant improvement in FFF in prostate cancer patients treated with 78 Gy but with a greater rate of late gastrointestinal toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18495377     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  115 in total

1.  Radiation therapy in prostate cancer: a risk-adapted strategy.

Authors:  A J Hayden; C Catton; T Pickles
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer-review of indications in 2010.

Authors:  H Quon; D A Loblaw
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  SEOM clinical guidelines for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  José Ángel Arranz Arija; Javier Cassinello Espinosa; Miguel Ángel Climent Durán; Fernando Rivero Herrero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Radiation therapy to the primary tumor in locally advanced prostate cancer is not "closing the barn door after the horse has bolted".

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Mark A Hallman; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Retreatment for prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Feasible or foolhardy?

Authors:  Stefano Arcangeli; Linda Agolli; Vittorio Donato
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-09-10

6.  Nomograms to predict late urinary toxicity after prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Juan David Ospina Arango; Véronique Beckendorf; Jean-Bernard Delobel; Taha Messai; Ciprian Chira; Alberto Bossi; Elisabeth Le Prisé; Stéphane Guerif; Jean-Marc Simon; Bernard Dubray; Jian Zhu; Jean-Léon Lagrange; Pascal Pommier; Khemara Gnep; Oscar Acosta; Renaud De Crevoisier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence after multimodal oncologic treatment for pelvic malignancies: a multicenter study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  M Schiano di Visconte; G A Santoro; N Cracco; G Sarzo; G Bellio; M Brunner; Z Cui; K E Matzel
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Toxicity after intensity-modulated, image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Sami Ok; Bülent Polat; Reinhart A Sweeney; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Dosimetric benefit of DMLC tracking for conventional and sub-volume boosted prostate intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Marianne Falk; Per R Poulsen; Paul J Keall; Ricky T O'Brien; Peter Meidahl Petersen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Systematic review of hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Nitin Ohri; Timothy N Showalter; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 12.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.