| Literature DB >> 23983672 |
P Jeslin Kanaga Inba1, B Annaraj, S Thalamuthu, M A Neelakantan.
Abstract
A salen ligand on reduction andEntities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23983672 PMCID: PMC3741936 DOI: 10.1155/2013/439848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Scheme 1Synthesis route for ligand and metal complexes.
Figure 113C NMR spectrum of ZnL recorded in DMSO-d6.
Absorption and emission spectral properties of metal (II) complexes with CT DNA.
| Compound |
| Band assignments |
|
Δ | aH% |
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Bound | ||||||||||
| CuL | 285, 349, |
| 271.5 | 273.2 | 1.7 | 32 | 10 | 6.25 | 8.44 | 3.08 | 1.159 |
| NiL | 280, 345, |
| 278.1 | 279.7 | 1.6 | 21 | 5 | 5 | 6.58 | 1.43 | 1.092 |
| ZnL | 282, 350 |
| 274.8 | 276.4 | 1.6 | 20 | 4 | 4.16 | 7.89 | 0.87 | 1.024 |
Spin Hamiltonian parameters of Cu(II) complex in DMSO at 300 K and 77 K.
| Compound | Hyperfine constant 10−4 (cm−1) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| KII |
|
|
|
|
| |
| CuL | 165 | 135 | 145 | 2.29 | 2.11 | 2.17 | 138 | 0.82 | 1.22 | 0.83 | 0.99 | 1.48 | 2.67 |
Figure 2UV-Vis absorption spectra of (a) CuL, (b) NiL, and (c) ZnL (10 µM) in the absence and presence of increasing amounts of CT DNA; [DNA] = 0–60 µM. The arrow indicates the absorbance change upon increasing DNA concentration. The inset is a plot of [DNA]/(ε − ε ) versus [DNA].
Figure 3Emission spectra of ethidium-bromide-bound DNA in the presence of (a) CuL, (b) NiL, and (c) ZnL. The arrow shows the intensity change upon increasing complex concentrations. Inset shows the plot of I 0/I Vs [complex].
Figure 4Scatchard plot of fluorescence titration of (a) CuL, (b) NiL, and (c) ZnL with CT DNA.
Figure 5Cyclic voltammogram of CuL at different scan rates: (a) 25 mVs−1, (b) 50 mVs−1, (c) 75 mVs−1, (d) 100 mVs−1, and (e) 125 mVs−1.
Figure 6Scavenging activity of the ligand (L) and its Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) complexes at various concentrations.