Literature DB >> 23977295

Examining complexity across domains: relating subjective and objective measures of affective environmental scenes, paintings and music.

Manuela M Marin1, Helmut Leder.   

Abstract

Subjective complexity has been found to be related to hedonic measures of preference, pleasantness and beauty, but there is no consensus about the nature of this relationship in the visual and musical domains. Moreover, the affective content of stimuli has been largely neglected so far in the study of complexity but is crucial in many everyday contexts and in aesthetic experiences. We thus propose a cross-domain approach that acknowledges the multidimensional nature of complexity and that uses a wide range of objective complexity measures combined with subjective ratings. In four experiments, we employed pictures of affective environmental scenes, representational paintings, and Romantic solo and chamber music excerpts. Stimuli were pre-selected to vary in emotional content (pleasantness and arousal) and complexity (low versus high number of elements). For each set of stimuli, in a between-subjects design, ratings of familiarity, complexity, pleasantness and arousal were obtained for a presentation time of 25 s from 152 participants. In line with Berlyne's collative-motivation model, statistical analyses controlling for familiarity revealed a positive relationship between subjective complexity and arousal, and the highest correlations were observed for musical stimuli. Evidence for a mediating role of arousal in the complexity-pleasantness relationship was demonstrated in all experiments, but was only significant for females with regard to music. The direction and strength of the linear relationship between complexity and pleasantness depended on the stimulus type and gender. For environmental scenes, the root mean square contrast measures and measures of compressed file size correlated best with subjective complexity, whereas only edge detection based on phase congruency yielded equivalent results for representational paintings. Measures of compressed file size and event density also showed positive correlations with complexity and arousal in music, which is relevant for the discussion on which aspects of complexity are domain-specific and which are domain-general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23977295      PMCID: PMC3745471          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  55 in total

1.  Measuring icon complexity: an automated analysis.

Authors:  Alex Forsythe; Noel Sheehy; Martin Sawey
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-05

2.  PERCEPTION AND PRODUCTION OF COMPLEXITY BY CREATIVE ART STUDENTS.

Authors:  R E TAYLOR; R EISENMAN
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  1964-01

3.  Contrast in complex images.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 4.  Visual complexity: a review.

Authors:  Don C Donderi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought.

Authors:  Gerald L Clore; Jeffrey R Huntsinger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The synchronization of electrodermal activity and heart rate and its relationship to energetic arousal: a time series approach.

Authors:  J Kettunen; N Ravaja; P Näätänen; P Keskivaara; L Keltikangas-Järvinen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Artistic forms and complexity.

Authors:  J-P Boon; J Casti; R P Taylor
Journal:  Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci       Date:  2011-04

8.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

9.  Affect as a function of stimulus variation.

Authors:  P C Vitz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-01

10.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  27 in total

1.  Parallel processing of general and specific threat during early stages of perception.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Wen Li
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Unitization mitigates interference by intrinsic negative emotion in familiarity and recollection of associative memory: Electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Meng Han; Xinrui Mao; Nika Kartvelishvili; Wen Li; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Ultra-Processed Foods Elicit Higher Approach Motivation Than Unprocessed and Minimally Processed Foods.

Authors:  Thayane C Lemos; Guilherme M S Coutinho; Laiz A A Silva; Jasmin B Stariolo; Rafaela R Campagnoli; Leticia Oliveira; Mirtes G Pereira; Bruna E F Mota; Gabriela G L Souza; Daniela S Canella; Neha Khandpur; Isabel A David
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  The stream of experience when watching artistic movies. Dynamic aesthetic effects revealed by the Continuous Evaluation Procedure (CEP).

Authors:  Claudia Muth; Marius H Raab; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-31

5.  Titles change the esthetic appreciations of paintings.

Authors:  Gernot Gerger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Crossing boundaries: toward a general model of neuroaesthetics.

Authors:  Manuela M Marin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  A Complex Story: Universal Preference vs. Individual Differences Shaping Aesthetic Response to Fractals Patterns.

Authors:  Nichola Street; Alexandra M Forsythe; Ronan Reilly; Richard Taylor; Mai S Helmy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Predicting Complexity Perception of Real World Images.

Authors:  Silvia Elena Corchs; Gianluigi Ciocca; Emanuela Bricolo; Francesca Gasparini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve.

Authors:  Yağmur Güçlütürk; Richard H A H Jacobs; Rob van Lier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Eye is Listening: Music-Induced Arousal and Individual Differences Predict Pupillary Responses.

Authors:  Bruno Gingras; Manuela M Marin; Estela Puig-Waldmüller; W T Fitch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.