Literature DB >> 12834094

Measuring icon complexity: an automated analysis.

Alex Forsythe1, Noel Sheehy, Martin Sawey.   

Abstract

Measures of icon designs rely heavily on surveys of the perceptions of population samples. Thus, measuring the extent to which changes in the structure of an icon will alter its perceived complexity can be costly and slow. An automated system capable of producing reliable estimates of perceived complexity could reduce development costs and time. Measures of icon complexity developed by Garcia, Badre, and Stasko (1994) and McDougall, Curry, and de Bruijn (1999) were correlated with six icon properties measured using Matlab (MathWorks, 2001) software, which uses image-processing techniques to measure icon properties. The six icon properties measured were icon foreground, the number of objects in an icon, the number of holes in those objects, and two calculations of icon edges and homogeneity in icon structure. The strongest correlates with human judgments of perceived icon complexity (McDougall et al., 1999) were structural variability (r(s) = .65) and edge information (r(s) = .64).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12834094     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  8 in total

1.  Examining complexity across domains: relating subjective and objective measures of affective environmental scenes, paintings and music.

Authors:  Manuela M Marin; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Predicting perceived visual complexity of abstract patterns using computational measures: The influence of mirror symmetry on complexity perception.

Authors:  Andreas Gartus; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Measuring streetscape complexity based on the statistics of local contrast and spatial frequency.

Authors:  André Cavalcante; Ahmed Mansouri; Lemya Kacha; Allan Kardec Barros; Yoshinori Takeuchi; Naoji Matsumoto; Noboru Ohnishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Complex Story: Universal Preference vs. Individual Differences Shaping Aesthetic Response to Fractals Patterns.

Authors:  Nichola Street; Alexandra M Forsythe; Ronan Reilly; Richard Taylor; Mai S Helmy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Predicting Complexity Perception of Real World Images.

Authors:  Silvia Elena Corchs; Gianluigi Ciocca; Emanuela Bricolo; Francesca Gasparini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Revisiting Rossion and Pourtois with new ratings for automated complexity, familiarity, beauty, and encounter.

Authors:  Alex Forsythe; Nichola Street; Mai Helmy
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

7.  Spatial complexity facilitates ordinal mapping with a novel symbol set.

Authors:  Christine Podwysocki; Robert A Reeve; Jacob M Paul; Jason D Forte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Diet-Related Mobile Apps to Promote Healthy Eating and Proper Nutrition: A Content Analysis and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Jihye Choi; Chongwook Chung; Hyekyung Woo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.