Literature DB >> 23975440

Documentation of outcomes for sacroiliac joint fusion: does prior spinal fusion influence the outcome?

Nate Slinkard1, Julie Agel, Marc F Swiontkowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective case series (level II) was to determine the clinical outcomes of anterior SIJ fusion, comparing the outcomes of patients who had prior spinal fusions at any level compared to patients who have not.
METHODS: This prospective study included 25 patients who underwent SIJ fusion with anterior plate fixation. All patients had failed non-operative treatment, had a positive Patrick test, and positive response to intra-articular SIJ injections with greater than 50 % pain relief. Patients had follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months where they completed Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) surveys. Outcome data are available for 19 patients who completed pre-operative and 12-month follow-up surveys. Their average time of the final follow-up was 1.1 years (range 10-33 months).
RESULTS: Significant improvements between pre-operative and the final follow-up in ODI (p = 0.007) and SMFA (p = 0.01) were observed; the ODI assessed outcomes in patients who had previous spinal fusion surgery were significantly worse than those that did not at the final follow-up (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Patients who have not undergone prior spinal fusion surgery, regardless of age, gender, and BMI have better outcomes following anterior SIJ fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23975440      PMCID: PMC3804715          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2968-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Jacob M Buchowski; Khaled M Kebaish; Vladimir Sinkov; David B Cohen; Ann N Sieber; John P Kostuik
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests.

Authors:  Mark Laslett; Charles N Aprill; Barry McDonald; Sharon B Young
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-08

3.  Provocation sacroiliac joint tests have validity in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain.

Authors:  Mark Laslett; Charles N Aprill; Barry McDonald
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; A Aivaliklis; F Pfefer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness.

Authors:  M F Swiontkowski; R Engelberg; D P Martin; J Agel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Gary S Gruen; Shervondalonn Brown; Susan George
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain.

Authors:  P Dreyfuss; M Michaelsen; K Pauza; J McLarty; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A C Schwarzer; C N Aprill; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks.

Authors:  J Y Maigne; C A Planchon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  The sacroiliac joint: an underappreciated pain generator.

Authors:  W J Daum
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1995-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.

Authors:  Jake Heiney; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-22

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2013.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 4.  Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Lingutla; Raymond Pollock; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?

Authors:  Charles G T Ledonio; David W Polly; Marc F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Arnold Graham Smith; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher; Leonard Rudolf; Donald Sachs; Mukund Gundanna; Jeffrey Kleiner; Milan G Mody; A Nick Shamie
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2013-10-30

7.  Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.

Authors:  Leonard Rudolf; Robyn Capobianco
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-10-17

8.  Patient Reported Outcomes from Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Vamsi K Kancherla; Shane M McGowan; Brittany N Audley; Gbolabo Sokunbi; Steven T Puccio
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-02-17

9.  Comparative effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.

Authors:  Charles Gt Ledonio; David W Polly; Marc F Swiontkowski; John T Cummings
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-06-05

10.  One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis.

Authors:  Donald Sachs; Robyn Capobianco; Daniel Cher; Timothy Holt; Mukund Gundanna; Timothy Graven; A Nick Shamie; John Cummings
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.