BACKGROUND: High-volume single-institution studies support the oncologic safety of nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM). Concerns remain regarding the increased potential for complications, recurrence, and delays to subsequent adjuvant therapy. A national database was used to examine treatment and outcomes for NSM patients. METHODS: Women undergoing unilateral NSM or skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) for stage 0-4 breast cancer from 2004 to 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Demographic and oncologic characteristics, short-term outcomes and time to local and systemic treatment were compared. RESULTS: NSM was performed on 8173 patients: 8.7% were node positive, and for stage 1-4 disease, 10.6% were triple negative (TN) and 15.3% were HER2-positive. NSM patients were less likely than SSM patients to receive chemotherapy [CT] (37.4 vs. 43.4%) or radiation [PMRT] (15.6 vs. 16.9%), and were also more likely to present with clinically early-stage disease. NSM patients with high-risk features were more likely to receive CT in the neoadjuvant [NCT] than adjuvant setting [AC] (OR 3.76, 1.81, and 1.99 for clinical N2/3, TN, and HER2-positive disease, all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, NSM patients had a higher rate of pathologic complete response [pCR] (OR 1.41, p < 0.001). Readmission rate, positive margin rate and time to CT, PMRT or hormonal therapy were not increased for NSM compared to SSM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Over one third of NSM patients received chemotherapy and/or radiation. NSM patients with high-risk features were more likely to receive NAC and obtain a pCR. NSM patients did not experience worse outcomes or delayed adjuvant therapy compared to SSM.
BACKGROUND: High-volume single-institution studies support the oncologic safety of nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM). Concerns remain regarding the increased potential for complications, recurrence, and delays to subsequent adjuvant therapy. A national database was used to examine treatment and outcomes for NSM patients. METHODS:Women undergoing unilateral NSM or skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) for stage 0-4 breast cancer from 2004 to 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Demographic and oncologic characteristics, short-term outcomes and time to local and systemic treatment were compared. RESULTS: NSM was performed on 8173 patients: 8.7% were node positive, and for stage 1-4 disease, 10.6% were triple negative (TN) and 15.3% were HER2-positive. NSM patients were less likely than SSM patients to receive chemotherapy [CT] (37.4 vs. 43.4%) or radiation [PMRT] (15.6 vs. 16.9%), and were also more likely to present with clinically early-stage disease. NSM patients with high-risk features were more likely to receive CT in the neoadjuvant [NCT] than adjuvant setting [AC] (OR 3.76, 1.81, and 1.99 for clinical N2/3, TN, and HER2-positive disease, all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, NSM patients had a higher rate of pathologic complete response [pCR] (OR 1.41, p < 0.001). Readmission rate, positive margin rate and time to CT, PMRT or hormonal therapy were not increased for NSM compared to SSM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Over one third of NSM patients received chemotherapy and/or radiation. NSM patients with high-risk features were more likely to receive NAC and obtain a pCR. NSM patients did not experience worse outcomes or delayed adjuvant therapy compared to SSM.
Authors: Anne Warren Peled; Frederick Wang; Robert D Foster; Michael Alvarado; Cheryl A Ewing; Hani Sbitany; Laura J Esserman Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Barbara L Smith; Rong Tang; Upahvan Rai; Jennifer K Plichta; Amy S Colwell; Michele A Gadd; Michelle C Specht; William G Austen; Suzanne B Coopey Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Mark Sisco; Alexandra M Kyrillos; Brittany R Lapin; Chihsiung E Wang; Katharine A Yao Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Christina A Clarke; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Sharon H Giordano Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ivo A Olivotto; Mary L Lesperance; Pauline T Truong; Alan Nichol; Tanya Berrang; Scott Tyldesley; François Germain; Caroline Speers; Elaine Wai; Caroline Holloway; Winkle Kwan; Hagen Kennecke Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-11-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Debora de Melo Gagliato; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Richard L Theriault; Sharon H Giordano; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Mariana Chavez-Macgregor Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Seung Ho Baek; Soon June Bae; Chang Ik Yoon; So Eun Park; Chi Hwan Cha; Sung Gwe Ahn; Young Seok Kim; Tai Suk Roh; Joon Jeong Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 3.588