Literature DB >> 29998077

Nipple sparing mastectomy techniques: a literature review and an inframammary technique.

Andrew Y Ashikari1,2,3, Pond R Kelemen1,2,3, Bahar Tastan1,2, C Andrew Salzberg4, Roy H Ashikari1,2,3.   

Abstract

Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) has quickly become an accepted technique for patients with selected cancers and for risk reducing surgery. Much of its surgical acceptance over the last decade has been based on the low risk of nipple areolar complex (NAC) occurrence in breast cancer patients. Improved patient satisfaction due to improved cosmetic outcomes with reconstruction have also driven its popularity. We reviewed current English journals to determine the NSM techniques which achieve the lowest complications, best outcomes, and best patient satisfaction. We researched studies showing reductions in complications with improved surgical techniques and patient selection which have been implicated in improved results. In the studies reviewed, incision placement, away from the nipple, resulted in the lowest rates of ischemic nipple complications and the best cosmetic outcomes. The effect of other factors such as surgeon experience and thickness of skin flap development were more difficult to prove. Leaving a 2-3 mm rim of tissue around the nipple bundle was shown to help preserve the nipple vascularity. Lower complication rates with improved outcomes and patient satisfaction were reported in the literature in patients with B or smaller cup sizes, non-smokers, and patients with lower body mass index (BMI). Incision placement, away from the nipple, with preservation of a 2-3 mm rim of tissue around the nipple bundle along with careful patient selection were the most significant variables reviewed which helped to lower complications rates of NSM. Coordinated surgical planning with the breast and plastic surgeons to determine the best surgical approach for each individual patient is necessary to obtain the best results. Although short-term oncologic follow-up seems to be acceptable, longer follow-up will still be needed to define the best breast cancer surgical candidates for the nipple sparing approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nipple sparing mastectomy technique; nipple sparing mastectomy complications; nipple sparing mastectomy cosmesis; nipple sparing mastectomy incisions; nipple sparing mastectomy satisfaction; nipple sparing mastectomy vascular supply

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998077      PMCID: PMC6006015          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.09.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  61 in total

1.  The blood supply to the nipple-areola complex of the human mammary gland.

Authors:  Petrus V van Deventer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements.

Authors:  Marzia Salgarello; Giuseppe Visconti; Liliana Barone-Adesi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  C Laronga; B Kemp; D Johnston; G L Robb; S E Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Katharine Yao; Andrew K Stewart; David J Winchester; David P Winchester
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Selective use of sentinel lymph node surgery during prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Nazanin Khakpour; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; Henry M Kuerer; Sonja E Singletary; Gildy V Babiera; Banu Arun; Kelly K Hunt; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study.

Authors:  Risal Djohan; Earl Gage; James Gatherwright; Sabrina Pavri; Jimmy Firouz; Steven Bernard; Randall Yetman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Endara; Duan Chen; Kapil Verma; Maurice Y Nahabedian; Scott L Spear
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Local Recurrence, and Nipple-Areolar Recurrence in the Setting of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucy De La Cruz; Alison M Moody; Erryn E Tappy; Stephanie A Blankenship; Eric M Hecht
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Suzanne B Coopey; Rong Tang; Lan Lei; Phoebe E Freer; Kari Kansal; Amy S Colwell; Michele A Gadd; Michelle C Specht; William G Austen; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  5 in total

1.  Hybrid breast reconstruction-the best of both worlds.

Authors:  Suhail Kanchwala; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

2.  Identifying the dissection plane for mastectomy-description and visualization of our technique.

Authors:  Camilla Bille; Farima Dalaei; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

3.  Effect of contralateral augmentation on postoperative complications after the second stage of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Suhwan Kim; Byung-Joon Jeon; Goo-Hyun Mun; Sa Ik Bang; Jai-Kyong Pyon
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

4.  Microwave Ablation Versus Nipple Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer ≤5 cm: A Pilot Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jie Yu; Zhi-Yu Han; Ting Li; Wen-Zhe Feng; Xiao-Ling Yu; Yan-Chun Luo; Han Wu; Jian Jiang; Jian-Dong Wang; Ping Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: Results of a mono-centric 4-years cohort.

Authors:  Olivia Quilichini; Julien Barrou; Marie Bannier; Sandrine Rua; Aurore Van Troy; Laura Sabiani; Eric Lambaudie; Monique Cohen; Gilles Houvenaeghel
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.