Literature DB >> 23975290

Improving breast diagnostic services with a Rapid Access Diagnostic and Support (RADS) program.

Angel Arnaout1, Jennifer Smylie, Jean Seely, Susan Robertson, Kathy Knight, Salome Shin, Tim Ramsey, Ranjeeta Mallick, James Watters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic phase of care is an anxiety-provoking and stressful experience for the potential breast cancer patient. A multidisciplinary team of breast cancer specialists embarked on a new initiative to pilot a Rapid Diagnosis and Support (RADS) Clinic to coordinate the diagnostic workup and nursing support for patients with a high probability of breast cancer.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with an initial diagnostic imaging classified as BI-RADS 5 were invited to participate in this 1-year prospective study. Coordination of diagnostic imaging workup and nursing support were provided by a nurse navigator. Wait times were evaluated at several intervals of care. Satisfaction surveys were given to study participants and compared to scores from patients who did not go through RADS clinic.
RESULTS: A total of 211 patients participated in the RADS clinic. Biopsy wait times improved from a mean of 7 to 3 days (p < 0.001), pathology from 3.9 to 3.3 days (p < 0.001), surgical consultation from 16.1 to 5.9 days (p < 0.001), and operative wait times from 31.5 to 24.1 days (p = 0.042). There was a 95.3 % satisfaction rate with the RADS clinic with significantly improvement in patients' sense of an understanding of the treatment plan (p = 0.031), timeliness of tests (p = 0.045), and timeliness of results (p = 0.0419).
CONCLUSIONS: The RADS clinic significantly improved diagnostic wait times and satisfaction scores for patients with a high probability of diagnosis of breast cancer and can serve as an innovative service delivery model for other breast care centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23975290     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3120-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  7 in total

1.  Cost analysis of breast cancer diagnostic assessment programs.

Authors:  G N Honein-AbouHaidar; J S Hoch; M J Dobrow; T Stuart-McEwan; D R McCready; A R Gagliardi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Budget impact analysis of a breast rapid diagnostic unit.

Authors:  M Elmi; H Hussein; S Nofech-Mozes; B Curpen; A Leahey; N Look Hong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  [Integrated care concepts and multidisciplinary process chains in a radiological context].

Authors:  J Bauer; E Kösel; A G Henkel; C D Spinner; R Kolisch
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Improving patient flow and timeliness in the diagnosis and management of breast abnormalities: the impact of a rapid diagnostic unit.

Authors:  J M Racz; C M B Holloway; W Huang; N J Look Hong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Effect of specialized diagnostic assessment units on the time to diagnosis in screen-detected breast cancer patients.

Authors:  L Jiang; J Gilbert; H Langley; R Moineddin; P A Groome
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Multi-disciplinary planning in health care: a review.

Authors:  A G Leeftink; I A Bikker; I M H Vliegen; R J Boucherie
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2018-02-27

7.  Diagnostic interval for non-screening patients undergoing mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Priscila Crivellaro; Monica Tafur; Ralph George; Derek Muradali
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.