G N Honein-AbouHaidar1,2, J S Hoch3,4, M J Dobrow4, T Stuart-McEwan5, D R McCready6, A R Gagliardi1. 1. Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. 2. Hariri School of Nursing, American University of Beirut, Lebanon. 3. St. Michael's Hospital, Cancer Care Ontario, and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON. 4. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 5. Gattuso Rapid Diagnostic Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON. 6. Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic assessment programs (daps) appear to improve the diagnosis of cancer, but evidence of their cost-effectiveness is lacking. Given that no earlier study used secondary financial data to estimate the cost of diagnostic tests in the province of Ontario, we explored how to use secondary financial data to retrieve the cost of key diagnostic test services in daps, and we tested the reliability of that cost-retrieving method with hospital-reported costs in preparation for future cost-effectiveness studies. METHODS: We powered our sample at an alpha of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a margin of error of ±5%, and randomly selected a sample of eligible patients referred to a dap for suspected breast cancer during 1 January-31 December 2012. Confirmatory diagnostic tests received by each patient were identified in medical records. Canadian Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes were used to search the secondary financial data Web portal at the Ontario Case Costing Initiative for an estimate of the direct, indirect, and total costs of each test. The hospital-reported cost of each test received was obtained from the host-hospital's finance department. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the cost of individual or group confirmatory diagnostic tests, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or the paired t-test was used to compare the Ontario Case Costing Initiative and hospital-reported costs. RESULTS: For the 191 identified patients with suspected breast cancer, the estimated total cost of $72,195.50 was not significantly different from the hospital-reported total cost of $72,035.52 (p = 0.24). Costs differed significantly when multiple tests to confirm the diagnosis were completed during one patient visit and when confirmatory tests reported in hospital data and in medical records were discrepant. The additional estimated cost for non-salaried physicians delivering diagnostic services was $28,387.50. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to use secondary financial data to retrieve the cost of key diagnostic tests in a breast cancer dap and to compare the reliability of the costs obtained by that estimation method with hospital-reported costs. We identified the strengths and challenges of each approach. Lessons learned from this study have to be taken into consideration in future cost-effectiveness studies.
OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic assessment programs (daps) appear to improve the diagnosis of cancer, but evidence of their cost-effectiveness is lacking. Given that no earlier study used secondary financial data to estimate the cost of diagnostic tests in the province of Ontario, we explored how to use secondary financial data to retrieve the cost of key diagnostic test services in daps, and we tested the reliability of that cost-retrieving method with hospital-reported costs in preparation for future cost-effectiveness studies. METHODS: We powered our sample at an alpha of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a margin of error of ±5%, and randomly selected a sample of eligible patients referred to a dap for suspected breast cancer during 1 January-31 December 2012. Confirmatory diagnostic tests received by each patient were identified in medical records. Canadian Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes were used to search the secondary financial data Web portal at the Ontario Case Costing Initiative for an estimate of the direct, indirect, and total costs of each test. The hospital-reported cost of each test received was obtained from the host-hospital's finance department. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the cost of individual or group confirmatory diagnostic tests, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or the paired t-test was used to compare the Ontario Case Costing Initiative and hospital-reported costs. RESULTS: For the 191 identified patients with suspected breast cancer, the estimated total cost of $72,195.50 was not significantly different from the hospital-reported total cost of $72,035.52 (p = 0.24). Costs differed significantly when multiple tests to confirm the diagnosis were completed during one patient visit and when confirmatory tests reported in hospital data and in medical records were discrepant. The additional estimated cost for non-salaried physicians delivering diagnostic services was $28,387.50. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to use secondary financial data to retrieve the cost of key diagnostic tests in a breast cancerdap and to compare the reliability of the costs obtained by that estimation method with hospital-reported costs. We identified the strengths and challenges of each approach. Lessons learned from this study have to be taken into consideration in future cost-effectiveness studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; cost analyses; diagnosis; diagnostic assessment programs
Authors: Don Husereau; Michael Drummond; Stavros Petrou; Chris Carswell; David Moher; Dan Greenberg; Federico Augustovski; Andrew H Briggs; Josephine Mauskopf; Elizabeth Loder Journal: Value Health Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Don Husereau; Michael Drummond; Stavros Petrou; Chris Carswell; David Moher; Dan Greenberg; Federico Augustovski; Andrew H Briggs; Josephine Mauskopf; Elizabeth Loder Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Mario R Castellanos; Joseph Conte; Dina Abi Fadel; Carolyn Raia; Frank Forte; Kathleen Ahern; Marianne Smith; Danny Elsayeh; Shalom Buchbinder Journal: Breast J Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Angel Arnaout; Jennifer Smylie; Jean Seely; Susan Robertson; Kathy Knight; Salome Shin; Tim Ramsey; Ranjeeta Mallick; James Watters Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: A R Gagliardi; G Honein-AbouHaidar; T Stuart-McEwan; J Smylie; A Arnaout; J Seely; F C Wright; M J Dobrow; M C Brouwers; K Bukhanov; D R McCready Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 2.520