J M Racz1, C M B Holloway2, W Huang1, N J Look Hong2. 1. University of Toronto, Department of Surgical Oncology, Toronto, ON; 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON;; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Efforts to streamline the diagnosis and treatment of breast abnormalities are necessary to limit patient anxiety and expedite care. In the present study, we examined the effect of a rapid diagnostic unit (rdu) on wait times to clinical investigations and definitive treatment. METHODS: A retrospective before-after series, each considering a 1-year period, examined consecutive patients with suspicious breast lesions before and after initiation of the rdu. Patient consultations, clinical investigations, and lesion characteristics were captured from time of patient referral to initiation of definitive treatment. Outcomes included time (days) to clinical investigations, to delivery of diagnosis, and to management. Groups were compared using the Fisher exact test or Student t-test. RESULTS: The non-rdu group included 287 patients with 164 invasive breast carcinomas. The rdu group included 260 patients with 154 invasive carcinomas. The rdu patients had more single visits for biopsy (92% rdu vs. 78% non-rdu, p < 0.0001). The rdu group also had a significantly shorter wait time from initial consultation to delivery of diagnosis (mean: 2.1 days vs. 16.7 days, p = 0.0001) and a greater chance of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (37% vs. 24%, p = 0.0106). Overall time from referral to management remained statistically unchanged (mean: 53 days with the rdu vs. 50 days without the rdu, p = 0.3806). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a rdu appears to reduce wait times to definitive diagnosis, but not to treatment initiation, suggesting that obstacles to care delivery can occur at several points along the diagnostic trajectory. Multipronged efforts to reduce system-related delays to definitive treatment are needed.
BACKGROUND: Efforts to streamline the diagnosis and treatment of breast abnormalities are necessary to limit patientanxiety and expedite care. In the present study, we examined the effect of a rapid diagnostic unit (rdu) on wait times to clinical investigations and definitive treatment. METHODS: A retrospective before-after series, each considering a 1-year period, examined consecutive patients with suspicious breast lesions before and after initiation of the rdu. Patient consultations, clinical investigations, and lesion characteristics were captured from time of patient referral to initiation of definitive treatment. Outcomes included time (days) to clinical investigations, to delivery of diagnosis, and to management. Groups were compared using the Fisher exact test or Student t-test. RESULTS: The non-rdu group included 287 patients with 164 invasive breast carcinomas. The rdu group included 260 patients with 154 invasive carcinomas. The rdu patients had more single visits for biopsy (92% rdu vs. 78% non-rdu, p < 0.0001). The rdu group also had a significantly shorter wait time from initial consultation to delivery of diagnosis (mean: 2.1 days vs. 16.7 days, p = 0.0001) and a greater chance of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (37% vs. 24%, p = 0.0106). Overall time from referral to management remained statistically unchanged (mean: 53 days with the rdu vs. 50 days without the rdu, p = 0.3806). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a rdu appears to reduce wait times to definitive diagnosis, but not to treatment initiation, suggesting that obstacles to care delivery can occur at several points along the diagnostic trajectory. Multipronged efforts to reduce system-related delays to definitive treatment are needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; diagnosis; efficiencies; wait times
Authors: Richard J Bleicher; Robin M Ciocca; Brian L Egleston; Linda Sesa; Kathryn Evers; Elin R Sigurdson; Monica Morrow Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Olga Vujovic; Edward Yu; Anil Cherian; Francisco Perera; A Rashid Dar; Larry Stitt; A Hammond Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-03-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Angel Arnaout; Jennifer Smylie; Jean Seely; Susan Robertson; Kathy Knight; Salome Shin; Tim Ramsey; Ranjeeta Mallick; James Watters Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: M Fung-Kee-Fung; D E Maziak; J R Pantarotto; J Smylie; L Taylor; T Timlin; T Cacciotti; P J Villeneuve; C Dennie; C Bornais; S Madore; J Aquino; P Wheatley-Price; R S Ozer; D J Stewart Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Chyke A Doubeni; Nicole B Gabler; Cosette M Wheeler; Anne Marie McCarthy; Philip E Castle; Ethan A Halm; Mitchell D Schnall; Celette S Skinner; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Anil Vachani; Shivan J Mehta; Katharine A Rendle; Stacey A Fedewa; Douglas A Corley; Katrina Armstrong Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 508.702