Literature DB >> 23967949

Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.

Claus Christiansen1, Ewen N MacDonald, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

Masking release (MR) is the improvement in speech intelligibility for a fluctuating interferer compared to stationary noise. Reduction in MR due to vocoder processing is usually linked to distortions in the temporal fine structure of the stimuli and a corresponding reduction in the fundamental frequency (F0) cues. However, it is unclear if envelope periodicity related to F0, produced by the interaction between unresolved harmonics, contributes to MR. In the present study, MR was determined from speech reception thresholds measured in the presence of stationary speech-shaped noise and a competing talker. Two types of processing were applied to the stimuli: (1) An amplitude- and frequency-modulated vocoder attenuated the envelope periodicity and (2) high-pass (HP) filtering (cutoff = 500 Hz) reduced the influence of F0-related information from low-order resolved harmonics. When applied individually, MR was unaffected by HP filtering, but slightly reduced when envelope periodicity was attenuated. When both were applied, MR was strongly reduced. Thus, the results indicate that F0-related information is crucial for MR, but that it is less important whether the F0-related information is conveyed by low-order resolved harmonics or by envelope periodicity as a result of unresolved harmonics. Further, envelope periodicity contributes substantially to MR.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967949     DOI: 10.1121/1.4816409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Top-down or bottom up: decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Srinivasa P Kommajosyula; Rui Cai; Edward Bartlett; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Alexandra L Sommer; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 6.  Specific synaptopathies diversify brain responses and hearing disorders: you lose the gain from early life.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Rama Panford-Walsh; Wibke Singer; Lukas Rüttiger; Ulrike Zimmermann
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Sarah Verhulst; Luke Shaheen; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21

8.  Dynamic Reweighting of Auditory Modulation Filters.

Authors:  Eva R M Joosten; Shihab A Shamma; Christian Lorenzi; Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Detecting Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy by Auditory Brainstem Response in Tinnitus Patients With Normal Hearing Thresholds: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Feifan Chen; Fei Zhao; Nadeem Mahafza; Wei Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.