Literature DB >> 23966712

Optogenetic control of fly optomotor responses.

Väinö Haikala1, Maximilian Joesch, Alexander Borst, Alex S Mauss.   

Abstract

When confronted with a large-field stimulus rotating around the vertical body axis, flies display a following behavior called "optomotor response." As neural control elements, the large tangential horizontal system (HS) cells of the lobula plate have been prime candidates for long. Here, we applied optogenetic stimulation of HS cells to evaluate their behavioral role in Drosophila. To minimize interference of the optical activation of channelrhodopsin-2 with the visual perception of the flies, we used a bistable variant called ChR2-C128S. By applying pulses of blue and yellow light, we first demonstrate electrophysiologically that lobula plate tangential cells can be activated and deactivated repeatedly with no evident change in depolarization strength over trials. We next show that selective optogenetic activation of HS cells elicits robust yaw head movements and yaw turning responses in fixed and tethered flying flies, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966712      PMCID: PMC6618655          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0340-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

1.  A faithful internal representation of walking movements in the Drosophila visual system.

Authors:  Terufumi Fujiwara; Tomás L Cruz; James P Bohnslav; M Eugenia Chiappe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Channelrhodopsin-2-XXL, a powerful optogenetic tool for low-light applications.

Authors:  Alexej Dawydow; Ronnie Gueta; Dmitrij Ljaschenko; Sybille Ullrich; Moritz Hermann; Nadine Ehmann; Shiqiang Gao; André Fiala; Tobias Langenhan; Georg Nagel; Robert J Kittel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cellular mechanisms for integral feedback in visually guided behavior.

Authors:  Bettina Schnell; Peter T Weir; Eatai Roth; Adrienne L Fairhall; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Asymmetry of Drosophila ON and OFF motion detectors enhances real-world velocity estimation.

Authors:  Aljoscha Leonhardt; Georg Ammer; Matthias Meier; Etienne Serbe; Armin Bahl; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Direction Selectivity in Drosophila Emerges from Preferred-Direction Enhancement and Null-Direction Suppression.

Authors:  Jonathan Chit Sing Leong; Jennifer Judson Esch; Ben Poole; Surya Ganguli; Thomas Robert Clandinin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Differential Tuning to Visual Motion Allows Robust Encoding of Optic Flow in the Dragonfly.

Authors:  Bernard J E Evans; David C O'Carroll; Joseph M Fabian; Steven D Wiederman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael H Dickinson; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Active vision shapes and coordinates flight motor responses in flies.

Authors:  Benjamin Cellini; Jean-Michel Mongeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cellular evidence for efference copy in Drosophila visuomotor processing.

Authors:  Anmo J Kim; Jamie K Fitzgerald; Gaby Maimon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Abolishment of Spontaneous Flight Turns in Visually Responsive Drosophila.

Authors:  Bennett Drew Ferris; Jonathan Green; Gaby Maimon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.