Literature DB >> 32873637

Active vision shapes and coordinates flight motor responses in flies.

Benjamin Cellini1, Jean-Michel Mongeau2.   

Abstract

Animals use active sensing to respond to sensory inputs and guide future motor decisions. In flight, flies generate a pattern of head and body movements to stabilize gaze. How the brain relays visual information to control head and body movements and how active head movements influence downstream motor control remains elusive. Using a control theoretic framework, we studied the optomotor gaze stabilization reflex in tethered flight and quantified how head movements stabilize visual motion and shape wing steering efforts in fruit flies (Drosophila). By shaping visual inputs, head movements increased the gain of wing steering responses and coordination between stimulus and wings, pointing to a tight coupling between head and wing movements. Head movements followed the visual stimulus in as little as 10 ms-a delay similar to the human vestibulo-ocular reflex-whereas wing steering responses lagged by more than 40 ms. This timing difference suggests a temporal order in the flow of visual information such that the head filters visual information eliciting downstream wing steering responses. Head fixation significantly decreased the mechanical power generated by the flight motor by reducing wingbeat frequency and overall thrust. By simulating an elementary motion detector array, we show that head movements shift the effective visual input dynamic range onto the sensitivity optimum of the motion vision pathway. Taken together, our results reveal a transformative influence of active vision on flight motor responses in flies. Our work provides a framework for understanding how to coordinate moving sensors on a moving body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; active sensing; control; sensorimotor integration; synergy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32873637      PMCID: PMC7502703          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920846117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

1.  A comparison of visual and haltere-mediated equilibrium reflexes in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alana Sherman; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The influence of sensory delay on the yaw dynamics of a flapping insect.

Authors:  Michael J Elzinga; William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Fly motion vision.

Authors:  Alexander Borst; Juergen Haag; Dierk F Reiff
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  Evolution of Biological Image Stabilization.

Authors:  Ben J Hardcastle; Holger G Krapp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Flexible strategies for flight control: an active role for the abdomen.

Authors:  Jonathan P Dyhr; Kristi A Morgansen; Thomas L Daniel; Noah J Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  A comparative approach to closed-loop computation.

Authors:  E Roth; S Sponberg; N J Cowan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael H Dickinson; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Spatial organization of visuomotor reflexes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lance F Tammero; Mark A Frye; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Binocular interactions underlying the classic optomotor responses of flying flies.

Authors:  Brian J Duistermars; Rachel A Care; Mark A Frye
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  The active control of wing rotation by Drosophila.

Authors:  M H Dickinson; F O Lehmann; K G Götz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  Integration of visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback during head stabilization in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Payel Chatterjee; Agnish Dev Prusty; Umesh Mohan; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Complementary feedback control enables effective gaze stabilization in animals.

Authors:  Benjamin Cellini; Wael Salem; Jean-Michel Mongeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Haltere and visual inputs sum linearly to predict wing (but not gaze) motor output in tethered flying Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael J Rauscher; Jessica L Fox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Bumblebees display characteristics of active vision during robust obstacle avoidance flight.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Tim Siesenop; Olivier J Bertrand; Liang Li; Charlotte Doussot; Alex Fisher; William H Warren; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Facilitation of neural responses to targets moving against optic flow.

Authors:  Sarah Nicholas; Karin Nordström
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Impact of walking speed and motion adaptation on optokinetic nystagmus-like head movements in the blowfly Calliphora.

Authors:  Kit D Longden; Anna Schützenberger; Ben J Hardcastle; Holger G Krapp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.