Literature DB >> 27488629

Direction Selectivity in Drosophila Emerges from Preferred-Direction Enhancement and Null-Direction Suppression.

Jonathan Chit Sing Leong1, Jennifer Judson Esch1, Ben Poole2, Surya Ganguli3, Thomas Robert Clandinin4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Across animal phyla, motion vision relies on neurons that respond preferentially to stimuli moving in one, preferred direction over the opposite, null direction. In the elementary motion detector of Drosophila, direction selectivity emerges in two neuron types, T4 and T5, but the computational algorithm underlying this selectivity remains unknown. We find that the receptive fields of both T4 and T5 exhibit spatiotemporally offset light-preferring and dark-preferring subfields, each obliquely oriented in spacetime. In a linear-nonlinear modeling framework, the spatiotemporal organization of the T5 receptive field predicts the activity of T5 in response to motion stimuli. These findings demonstrate that direction selectivity emerges from the enhancement of responses to motion in the preferred direction, as well as the suppression of responses to motion in the null direction. Thus, remarkably, T5 incorporates the essential algorithmic strategies used by the Hassenstein-Reichardt correlator and the Barlow-Levick detector. Our model for T5 also provides an algorithmic explanation for the selectivity of T5 for moving dark edges: our model captures all two- and three-point spacetime correlations relevant to motion in this stimulus class. More broadly, our findings reveal the contribution of input pathway visual processing, specifically center-surround, temporally biphasic receptive fields, to the generation of direction selectivity in T5. As the spatiotemporal receptive field of T5 in Drosophila is common to the simple cell in vertebrate visual cortex, our stimulus-response model of T5 will inform efforts in an experimentally tractable context to identify more detailed, mechanistic models of a prevalent computation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Feature selective neurons respond preferentially to astonishingly specific stimuli, providing the neurobiological basis for perception. Direction selectivity serves as a paradigmatic model of feature selectivity that has been examined in many species. While insect elementary motion detectors have served as premiere experimental models of direction selectivity for 60 years, the central question of their underlying algorithm remains unanswered. Using in vivo two-photon imaging of intracellular calcium signals, we measure the receptive fields of the first direction-selective cells in the Drosophila visual system, and define the algorithm used to compute the direction of motion. Computational modeling of these receptive fields predicts responses to motion and reveals how this circuit efficiently captures many useful correlations intrinsic to moving dark edges.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/368078-15$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hassenstein–Reichardt correlator; elementary motion detection; two-photon calcium imaging in vivo

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27488629      PMCID: PMC4971360          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1272-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Two-photon calcium imaging reveals an odor-evoked map of activity in the fly brain.

Authors:  Jing W Wang; Allan M Wong; Jorge Flores; Leslie B Vosshall; Richard Axel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Mechanisms of direction selectivity in cat primary visual cortex as revealed by visual adaptation.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Ilan Lampl; David Ferster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex.

Authors:  Kenichi Ohki; Sooyoung Chung; Yeang H Ch'ng; Prakash Kara; R Clay Reid
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors.

Authors:  Matthew S Maisak; Juergen Haag; Georg Ammer; Etienne Serbe; Matthias Meier; Aljoscha Leonhardt; Tabea Schilling; Armin Bahl; Gerald M Rubin; Aljoscha Nern; Barry J Dickson; Dierk F Reiff; Elisabeth Hopp; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Fly motion vision.

Authors:  Alexander Borst; Juergen Haag; Dierk F Reiff
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  The statistics of local motion signals in naturalistic movies.

Authors:  Eyal I Nitzany; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Defining the computational structure of the motion detector in Drosophila.

Authors:  Damon A Clark; Limor Bursztyn; Mark A Horowitz; Mark J Schnitzer; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  ON and OFF pathways in Drosophila motion vision.

Authors:  Maximilian Joesch; Bettina Schnell; Shamprasad Varija Raghu; Dierk F Reiff; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Subcellular Imaging of Voltage and Calcium Signals Reveals Neural Processing In Vivo.

Authors:  Helen H Yang; François St-Pierre; Xulu Sun; Xiaozhe Ding; Michael Z Lin; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  A genetically encoded calcium indicator for chronic in vivo two-photon imaging.

Authors:  Marco Mank; Alexandre Ferrão Santos; Stephan Direnberger; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel; Sonja B Hofer; Valentin Stein; Thomas Hendel; Dierk F Reiff; Christiaan Levelt; Alexander Borst; Tobias Bonhoeffer; Mark Hübener; Oliver Griesbeck
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  31 in total

1.  Asymmetric ON-OFF processing of visual motion cancels variability induced by the structure of natural scenes.

Authors:  James E Fitzgerald; Damon A Clark; Juyue Chen; Holly B Mandel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  The Neuronal Basis of an Illusory Motion Percept Is Explained by Decorrelation of Parallel Motion Pathways.

Authors:  Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas; Margarida Agrochao; James E Fitzgerald; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  ON selectivity in the Drosophila visual system is a multisynaptic process involving both glutamatergic and GABAergic inhibition.

Authors:  Sebastian Molina-Obando; Juan Felipe Vargas-Fique; Miriam Henning; Burak Gür; T Moritz Schladt; Junaid Akhtar; Thomas K Berger; Marion Silies
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  A flexible geometry for panoramic visual and optogenetic stimulation during behavior and physiology.

Authors:  Matthew S Creamer; Omer Mano; Ryosuke Tanaka; Damon A Clark
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Heterogeneous Temporal Contrast Adaptation in Drosophila Direction-Selective Circuits.

Authors:  Catherine A Matulis; Juyue Chen; Aneysis D Gonzalez-Suarez; Rudy Behnia; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Visual Control of Walking Speed in Drosophila.

Authors:  Matthew S Creamer; Omer Mano; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Development of Concurrent Retinotopic Maps in the Fly Motion Detection Circuit.

Authors:  Filipe Pinto-Teixeira; Clara Koo; Anthony Michael Rossi; Nathalie Neriec; Claire Bertet; Xin Li; Alberto Del-Valle-Rodriguez; Claude Desplan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Linear Summation Underlies Direction Selectivity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Carl F R Wienecke; Jonathan C S Leong; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans.

Authors:  Margarida Agrochao; Ryosuke Tanaka; Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  SPARC enables genetic manipulation of precise proportions of cells.

Authors:  Jesse Isaacman-Beck; Kristine C Paik; Carl F R Wienecke; Helen H Yang; Yvette E Fisher; Irving E Wang; Itzel G Ishida; Gaby Maimon; Rachel I Wilson; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.