Literature DB >> 23966312

Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Harikrishna Makani1, Sripal Bangalore2, Azhar Supariwala1, Jorge Romero3, Edgar Argulian1, Franz H Messerli4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are available in different dosages and it is common clinical practice to uptitrate if blood pressure goal is not achieved with the initial dose. Data on the incremental antihypertensive efficacy with uptitration are scarce. It is also unclear if antihypertensive efficacy of losartan is comparable with other ARBs. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We systematically reviewed PubMed/EMBASE/Cochrane databases for all randomized clinical trials until December 2012 reporting 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) for most commonly available ARBs in patients with hypertension. Reduction in ABP with ARBs was evaluated at 25% of the maximum (max) dose, 50% of the max dose, and at the max dose. Comparison was made between 24 h BP-lowering effect of losartan 50 and 100 mg and other ARBs at 50% max dose and the max dose, respectively. Sixty-two studies enrolling 15 289 patients (mean age 56 years; 60% men) with a mean duration of 10 weeks were included in the analysis. Overall, the dose-response curve with ARBs was shallow with decrease of 10.3/6.7 (systolic/diastolic), 11.7/7.6, and 13.0/8.3 mmHg with 25% max dose, 50% max dose, and with the max dose of ARBs, respectively. Losartan in the dose of 50 mg lowered ABP less well than other ARBs at 50% max dose by 2.5 mmHg systolic (P < 0.0001) and 1.8 mmHg diastolic (P = 0.0003). Losartan 100 mg lowered ABP less well than other ARBs at max dose by 3.9 mm Hg systolic (P = 0.0002) and 2.2 mmHg diastolic (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive analysis of the antihypertensive efficacy of ARBs by 24 h ABP, we observed a shallow dose-response curve, and uptitration marginally enhanced the antihypertensive efficacy. Blood pressure reduction with losartan at starting dose and at max dose was consistently inferior to the other ARBs. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2013. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Angiotensin receptor blockers; Hypertension; Meta-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966312      PMCID: PMC5994844          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  82 in total

1.  Three-dimensional echocardiographic and magnetic resonance assessment of the effect of telmisartan compared with carvedilol on left ventricular mass a multicenter, randomized, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Domenico Galzerano; Paolo Tammaro; Luca del Viscovo; Diana Lama; Antonio Galzerano; Roberto Breglio; Bernardino Tuccillo; Giuseppe Paolisso; Paolo Capogrosso
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  A comparative trial of controlled-onset, extended-release verapamil, enalapril, and losartan on blood pressure and heart rate changes.

Authors:  George Bakris; Dominic Sica; Venkata Ram; Timothy Fagan; Paul T Vaitkus; Robert J Anders
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Effects of losartan and amlodipine on urinary albumin excretion and ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy.

Authors:  Gen Yasuda; Daisaku Ando; Nobuhito Hirawa; Satoshi Umemura; Osamu Tochikubo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of low-dose perindopril/indapamide combination compared with losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  X Chanudet; M De Champvallins
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The prospective, randomized investigation of the safety and efficacy of telmisartan versus ramipril using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (PRISMA I).

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Philippe Gosse; Linda Lowe; Ruth Harper
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  A randomized, double-blind, forced-titration study to compare olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Henry A Punzi; John M Flack; Kathy A Stoakes; Kathleen J Chavanu; Wei Li; Robert Dubiel
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.

Authors:  David H G Smith; Robert Dubiel; Michael Jones
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.571

8.  Antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonist losartan: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial using 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Study Group.

Authors:  R L Byyny
Journal:  Blood Press Suppl       Date:  1996

9.  Maintenance of blood-pressure-lowering effect following a missed dose of aliskiren, irbesartan or ramipril: results of a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  P Palatini; W Jung; E Shlyakhto; J Botha; C Bush; D L Keefe
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Comparison of telmisartan versus losartan: meta-analysis of titration-to-response studies.

Authors:  David H G Smith; Maarten-Jan M Cramer; Joel M Neutel; Rohan Hettiarachchi; Stephen Koval
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.444

View more
  13 in total

1.  Medicare Spending on Brand-name Combination Medications vs Their Generic Constituents.

Authors:  Chana A Sacks; ChangWon C Lee; Aaron S Kesselheim; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cost-benefit effectiveness of angiotensin-II receptor blockers in patients with uncomplicated hypertension: A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Mazza; Antonella Paola Sacco; Danyelle M Townsend; Gianni Bregola; Edgardo Contatto; Isabella Cappello; Laura Schiavon; Emilio Ramazzina; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.529

3.  Is There a Role for Device Therapies in Resistant Hypertension?: The CON Side.

Authors:  Aldo J Peixoto
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-01-02

4.  Effect of Olmesartan-Based Therapies on Therapeutic Indicators Obtained Through Out-of-Office Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Manuel Gorostidi
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2015-06-13

5.  A Single-Center, Open-Label, 3-Way Crossover Trial to Determine the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Nebivolol and Valsartan in Healthy Volunteers at Steady State.

Authors:  Chun Lin Chen; Daksha Desai-Krieger; Stephan Ortiz; Majid Kerolous; Harold M Wright; Parviz Ghahramani
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.688

Review 6.  Clinical utility of fixed-dose combinations in hypertension: evidence for the potential of nebivolol/valsartan.

Authors:  Jasmina Varagic; Henry Punzi; Carlos M Ferrario
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2014-11-26

7.  Different initiatives across Europe to enhance losartan utilization post generics: impact and implications.

Authors:  James C Moon; Brian Godman; Max Petzold; Samantha Alvarez-Madrazo; Kathleen Bennett; Iain Bishop; Anna Bucsics; Ulrik Hesse; Andrew Martin; Steven Simoens; Corinne Zara; Rickard E Malmström
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Influence of Age and Race on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Responses to Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide, and Their Combination: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo; Yan Jia; Dion H Zappe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Perindopril for improving cardiovascular events.

Authors:  James J DiNicolantonio; James H O'Keefe
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-08-30

10.  Differences in weight change trajectory patterns in a publicly funded adult weight management centre.

Authors:  J L Kuk; S Wharton
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2016-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.