Literature DB >> 15631537

Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.

David H G Smith1, Robert Dubiel, Michael Jones.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Goal rates, the percentage of patients with hypertension achieving recommended SBP/DBP, are a clinically important assessment of an antihypertensive agent's efficacy. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) allows accurate assessment of a patient's hypertension and risk for cardiovascular events, and provides the most accurate measure of an antihypertensive agent's efficacy throughout a 24-hour dosing interval.
METHODS: A 12-week (4-week single-blind placebo run-in phase followed by an 8-week double-blind active treatment phase) randomized, parallel-group study reported that the recommended starting dose of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker; ARB) olmesartan medoxomil (Benicar(trade mark)) 20 mg/day was more effective than starting doses of losartan potassium (Cozaar) 50 mg/day, valsartan (Diovan) 80 mg/day, or irbesartan (Avapro) 150 mg/day in reducing cuff DBP in patients with essential hypertension. The present report includes analyses of secondary efficacy variables from this 12-week trial.
RESULTS: The mean reduction in blood pressure from baseline to week 8 (end of treatment) was significantly greater with olmesartan medoxomil than with valsartan for all ABPM times analyzed (24 hours, daytime, night-time, and last 2 and 4 hours of monitoring). Statistical significance was reached for comparisons of olmesartan medoxomil with losartan potassium for a majority of times analyzed and with irbesartan for SBP in the last 4 hours of monitoring. Goal rates for accepted critical ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) values of <130/80 mm Hg for mean 24-hour ABP, <135/85 mm Hg for mean daytime ABP, and <120/75 mm Hg for mean night-time ABP were significantly greater for patients receiving olmesartan medoxomil than for those receiving losartan potassium or valsartan. Goal rates were numerically superior, but not statistically significant, to those achieved with irbesartan. Compared with losartan potassium or valsartan recipients, a significantly higher percentage of patients treated with olmesartan medoxomil achieved the 24-hour ABP goal of <130/85 mm Hg. The last 2 and 4 hours of ABPM indicated that olmesartan medoxomil maintained larger mean decreases in blood pressure through the morning surge. DISCUSSION/
CONCLUSION: ABP goal rates are a meaningful measure of antihypertensive efficacy. The effects on mean change from baseline in ABP and ABP goal rates after 8 weeks of treatment were numerically better, but not statistically significant, for olmesartan medoxomil than for irbesartan. However, olmesartan medoxomil was significantly more effective than losartan potassium or valsartan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15631537     DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200505010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs        ISSN: 1175-3277            Impact factor:   3.571


  43 in total

Review 1.  Losartan: a review of its use in stroke risk reduction in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Marit D Moen; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the OLMEBEST Study.

Authors:  Vivencio Barrios; Alessandro Boccanelli; Silke Ewald; Xavier Girerd; Anthony Heagerty; Jean-Marie Krzesinski; Robert Lins; José Rodicio; Thomas Stefenelli; Arend Woittiez; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  HONEST to clarify association between home blood pressure and cardiovascular events under antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  K Kario
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Molecular characterisation of the interactions between olmesartan and telmisartan and the human angiotensin II AT1 receptor.

Authors:  M T Le; M K Pugsley; G Vauquelin; I Van Liefde
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Do all angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers have the same beneficial effects?

Authors:  S Miura; K Saku
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Role of olmesartan in combination therapy in blood pressure control and vascular function.

Authors:  Carlos M Ferrario; Ronald D Smith
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-09-07

7.  Olmesartan medoxomil plus amlodipine increases efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension after monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study.

Authors:  Vivencio Barrios; Peter Brommer; Uwe Haag; Alberto Calderón; Carlos Escobar
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk through Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonism : Focus on Olmesartan Medoxomil.

Authors:  Enrico Agabiti Rosei
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-01-22

Review 9.  Irbesartan: a review of its use in hypertension and diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.