Literature DB >> 12900588

Comparison of telmisartan versus losartan: meta-analysis of titration-to-response studies.

David H G Smith, Maarten-Jan M Cramer, Joel M Neutel, Rohan Hettiarachchi, Stephen Koval.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the ability of telmisartan and losartan to reduce mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval in a prospectively planned meta-analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data from two independent studies.
METHODS: Data were from two independent randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, titration-to-response studies conducted in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (seated cuff DBP 95-109 mmHg, 24-h mean ambulatory DBP >or=85 mmHg). After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients received once-daily telmisartan 40 mg or losartan 50 mg, with up-titration after 4 weeks to telmisartan 80 mg or losartan 100 mg, respectively, if seated trough cuff DBP >or=90 mmHg. Blood pressures were recorded using ABPM immediately before randomization and after 8 weeks of active treatment. In addition, seated trough cuff blood pressures were measured at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks of active treatment.
RESULTS: Titration to the higher dose was required in 60.1% of telmisartan patients and 69.5% of losartan patients (P=0.01). Reductions from baseline in the last 6 h mean ambulatory DBP with telmisartan and losartan were 6.6+/-0.4 and 5.1+/-0.4 mmHg, respectively (P<0.01, adjusted for baseline and study); the effects were homogeneous across the two studies. During the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval, telmisartan produced greater reductions in each of the observed hourly mean ambulatory DBP values. Telmisartan-induced reductions were also greater for the majority of the observed hourly mean ambulatory DBP values over the entire 24-h dosing interval. Reductions from baseline in the last 6 h adjusted mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) for telmisartan and losartan were 9.9+/-0.6 and 7.8+/-0.6 mmHg, respectively (P=0.01). The 24-h profiles of ambulatory SBP hourly mean reductions were similar to those for DBP. Both telmisartan and losartan were found to be safe and well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan 40/80 mg is superior to losartan 50/100 mg in controlling DBP and SBP during the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12900588     DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200306000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  12 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tony Antoniou; Ximena Camacho; Zhan Yao; Tara Gomes; David N Juurlink; Muhammad M Mamdani
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan.

Authors:  Domenico Galzerano; Cristina Capogrosso; Sara Di Michele; Antonio Galzerano; Paola Paparello; Diana Lama; Carlo Gaudio
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 3.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Domenic Sica; William B White; Michael A Weber; George L Bakris; Alfonso Perez; Charlie Cao; Alison Handley; Stuart Kupfer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  An issue of dependence: implications from the Aliskiren in the Evaluation of Proteinuria in Diabetes (AVOID) trial.

Authors:  Daniel M Riche; Deborah S Minor; Amber S Holdiness; Honey E East
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Telmisartan versus valsartan in patients with hypertension: effects on cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Lim; Sun Won Kim; Eung Ju Kim; Jun Hyuk Kang; Su A Kim; Yun Kyung Kim; Jin Oh Na; Cheol Ung Choi; Hong Euy Lim; Seong Woo Han; Seung-Woon Rha; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo; Dong Joo Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 7.  Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans.

Authors:  Theodore W Kurtz; Takashi Kajiya
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-02-28

Review 8.  What is a preferred angiotensin II receptor blocker-based combination therapy for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with diabetic and non-diabetic renal impairment?

Authors:  Samir G Mallat
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 9.951

9.  New treatment options in the management of hypertension: appraising the potential role of azilsartan medoxomil.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Carmine Savoia
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2012-03-12

10.  Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the SMOOTH study.

Authors:  Arya M Sharma; Jaime Davidson; Stephen Koval; Yves Lacourcière
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.