MOTIVATION: After more than a decade since microarrays were used to predict phenotype of biological samples, real-life applications for disease screening and identification of patients who would best benefit from treatment are still emerging. The interest of the scientific community in identifying best approaches to develop such prediction models was reaffirmed in a competition style international collaboration called IMPROVER Diagnostic Signature Challenge whose results we describe herein. RESULTS: Fifty-four teams used public data to develop prediction models in four disease areas including multiple sclerosis, lung cancer, psoriasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and made predictions on blinded new data that we generated. Teams were scored using three metrics that captured various aspects of the quality of predictions, and best performers were awarded. This article presents the challenge results and introduces to the community the approaches of the best overall three performers, as well as an R package that implements the approach of the best overall team. The analyses of model performance data submitted in the challenge as well as additional simulations that we have performed revealed that (i) the quality of predictions depends more on the disease endpoint than on the particular approaches used in the challenge; (ii) the most important modeling factor (e.g. data preprocessing, feature selection and classifier type) is problem dependent; and (iii) for optimal results datasets and methods have to be carefully matched. Biomedical factors such as the disease severity and confidence in diagnostic were found to be associated with the misclassification rates across the different teams. AVAILABILITY: The lung cancer dataset is available from Gene Expression Omnibus (accession, GSE43580). The maPredictDSC R package implementing the approach of the best overall team is available at www.bioconductor.org or http://bioinformaticsprb.med.wayne.edu/.
MOTIVATION: After more than a decade since microarrays were used to predict phenotype of biological samples, real-life applications for disease screening and identification of patients who would best benefit from treatment are still emerging. The interest of the scientific community in identifying best approaches to develop such prediction models was reaffirmed in a competition style international collaboration called IMPROVER Diagnostic Signature Challenge whose results we describe herein. RESULTS: Fifty-four teams used public data to develop prediction models in four disease areas including multiple sclerosis, lung cancer, psoriasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and made predictions on blinded new data that we generated. Teams were scored using three metrics that captured various aspects of the quality of predictions, and best performers were awarded. This article presents the challenge results and introduces to the community the approaches of the best overall three performers, as well as an R package that implements the approach of the best overall team. The analyses of model performance data submitted in the challenge as well as additional simulations that we have performed revealed that (i) the quality of predictions depends more on the disease endpoint than on the particular approaches used in the challenge; (ii) the most important modeling factor (e.g. data preprocessing, feature selection and classifier type) is problem dependent; and (iii) for optimal results datasets and methods have to be carefully matched. Biomedical factors such as the disease severity and confidence in diagnostic were found to be associated with the misclassification rates across the different teams. AVAILABILITY: The lung cancer dataset is available from Gene Expression Omnibus (accession, GSE43580). The maPredictDSC R package implementing the approach of the best overall team is available at www.bioconductor.org or http://bioinformaticsprb.med.wayne.edu/.
Authors: Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Leming Shi; Gregory Campbell; Wendell D Jones; Fabien Campagne; Zhining Wen; Stephen J Walker; Zhenqiang Su; Tzu-Ming Chu; Federico M Goodsaid; Lajos Pusztai; John D Shaughnessy; André Oberthuer; Russell S Thomas; Richard S Paules; Mark Fielden; Bart Barlogie; Weijie Chen; Pan Du; Matthias Fischer; Cesare Furlanello; Brandon D Gallas; Xijin Ge; Dalila B Megherbi; W Fraser Symmans; May D Wang; John Zhang; Hans Bitter; Benedikt Brors; Pierre R Bushel; Max Bylesjo; Minjun Chen; Jie Cheng; Jing Cheng; Jeff Chou; Timothy S Davison; Mauro Delorenzi; Youping Deng; Viswanath Devanarayan; David J Dix; Joaquin Dopazo; Kevin C Dorff; Fathi Elloumi; Jianqing Fan; Shicai Fan; Xiaohui Fan; Hong Fang; Nina Gonzaludo; Kenneth R Hess; Huixiao Hong; Jun Huan; Rafael A Irizarry; Richard Judson; Dilafruz Juraeva; Samir Lababidi; Christophe G Lambert; Li Li; Yanen Li; Zhen Li; Simon M Lin; Guozhen Liu; Edward K Lobenhofer; Jun Luo; Wen Luo; Matthew N McCall; Yuri Nikolsky; Gene A Pennello; Roger G Perkins; Reena Philip; Vlad Popovici; Nathan D Price; Feng Qian; Andreas Scherer; Tieliu Shi; Weiwei Shi; Jaeyun Sung; Danielle Thierry-Mieg; Jean Thierry-Mieg; Venkata Thodima; Johan Trygg; Lakshmi Vishnuvajjala; Sue Jane Wang; Jianping Wu; Yichao Wu; Qian Xie; Waleed A Yousef; Liang Zhang; Xuegong Zhang; Sheng Zhong; Yiming Zhou; Sheng Zhu; Dhivya Arasappan; Wenjun Bao; Anne Bergstrom Lucas; Frank Berthold; Richard J Brennan; Andreas Buness; Jennifer G Catalano; Chang Chang; Rong Chen; Yiyu Cheng; Jian Cui; Wendy Czika; Francesca Demichelis; Xutao Deng; Damir Dosymbekov; Roland Eils; Yang Feng; Jennifer Fostel; Stephanie Fulmer-Smentek; James C Fuscoe; Laurent Gatto; Weigong Ge; Darlene R Goldstein; Li Guo; Donald N Halbert; Jing Han; Stephen C Harris; Christos Hatzis; Damir Herman; Jianping Huang; Roderick V Jensen; Rui Jiang; Charles D Johnson; Giuseppe Jurman; Yvonne Kahlert; Sadik A Khuder; Matthias Kohl; Jianying Li; Li Li; Menglong Li; Quan-Zhen Li; Shao Li; Zhiguang Li; Jie Liu; Ying Liu; Zhichao Liu; Lu Meng; Manuel Madera; Francisco Martinez-Murillo; Ignacio Medina; Joseph Meehan; Kelci Miclaus; Richard A Moffitt; David Montaner; Piali Mukherjee; George J Mulligan; Padraic Neville; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Baitang Ning; Grier P Page; Joel Parker; R Mitchell Parry; Xuejun Peng; Ron L Peterson; John H Phan; Brian Quanz; Yi Ren; Samantha Riccadonna; Alan H Roter; Frank W Samuelson; Martin M Schumacher; Joseph D Shambaugh; Qiang Shi; Richard Shippy; Shengzhu Si; Aaron Smalter; Christos Sotiriou; Mat Soukup; Frank Staedtler; Guido Steiner; Todd H Stokes; Qinglan Sun; Pei-Yi Tan; Rong Tang; Zivana Tezak; Brett Thorn; Marina Tsyganova; Yaron Turpaz; Silvia C Vega; Roberto Visintainer; Juergen von Frese; Charles Wang; Eric Wang; Junwei Wang; Wei Wang; Frank Westermann; James C Willey; Matthew Woods; Shujian Wu; Nianqing Xiao; Joshua Xu; Lei Xu; Lun Yang; Xiao Zeng; Jialu Zhang; Li Zhang; Min Zhang; Chen Zhao; Raj K Puri; Uwe Scherf; Weida Tong; Russell D Wolfinger Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: M Bittner; P Meltzer; Y Chen; Y Jiang; E Seftor; M Hendrix; M Radmacher; R Simon; Z Yakhini; A Ben-Dor; N Sampas; E Dougherty; E Wang; F Marincola; C Gooden; J Lueders; A Glatfelter; P Pollock; J Carpten; E Gillanders; D Leja; K Dietrich; C Beaudry; M Berens; D Alberts; V Sondak Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: J Luo; M Schumacher; A Scherer; D Sanoudou; D Megherbi; T Davison; T Shi; W Tong; L Shi; H Hong; C Zhao; F Elloumi; W Shi; R Thomas; S Lin; G Tillinghast; G Liu; Y Zhou; D Herman; Y Li; Y Deng; H Fang; P Bushel; M Woods; J Zhang Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Pablo Meyer; Julia Hoeng; J Jeremy Rice; Raquel Norel; Jörg Sprengel; Katrin Stolle; Thomas Bonk; Stephanie Corthesy; Ajay Royyuru; Manuel C Peitsch; Gustavo Stolovitzky Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Ömer Sinan Saraç; Rahul Kumar; Sandeep Kumar Dhanda; Ali Tuğrul Balcı; İsmail Bilgen; Roberto Romero; Adi L Tarca Journal: Comput Toxicol Date: 2017-04-28
Authors: Stephanie Boue; Brett Fields; Julia Hoeng; Jennifer Park; Manuel C Peitsch; Walter K Schlage; Marja Talikka; Ilona Binenbaum; Vladimir Bondarenko; Oleg V Bulgakov; Vera Cherkasova; Norberto Diaz-Diaz; Larisa Fedorova; Svetlana Guryanova; Julia Guzova; Galina Igorevna Koroleva; Elena Kozhemyakina; Rahul Kumar; Noa Lavid; Qingxian Lu; Swapna Menon; Yael Ouliel; Samantha C Peterson; Alexander Prokhorov; Edward Sanders; Sarah Schrier; Golan Schwaitzer Neta; Irina Shvydchenko; Aravind Tallam; Gema Villa-Fombuena; John Wu; Ilya Yudkevich; Mariya Zelikman Journal: F1000Res Date: 2015-01-29