| Literature DB >> 23965599 |
Hiroki Hirayama1, Soichi Kageyama, Satoru Moriyasu, Ken Sawai, Akira Minamihashi.
Abstract
In domestic animals of the family Bovidae, sex preselection of offspring has been demanded for convenience of milk/beef production and animal breeding. Development of the nonsurgical embryo transfer technique and sexing methods of preimplantation embryos made it possible. Sexing based on detection of Y chromosome-specific DNA sequences is considered the most reliable method to date. PCR enables amplification of a target sequence from a small number of blastomeres. However, it requires technical skill and is time consuming. Furthermore, PCR has the risk of false positives because of DNA contamination during handling of the PCR products in duplicate PCR procedures and/or electrophoresis. Therefore, for embryo sexing to become widely used in the cattle embryo transfer industry, a simple, rapid and precise sexing method needs to be developed. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a novel DNA amplification method, and the reaction is carried out under isothermal conditions (range, 60 to 65 C) using DNA polymerase with strand displacement activity. When the target DNA is amplified by LAMP, a white precipitate derived from magnesium pyrophosphate (a by-product of the LAMP reaction) is observed. It is noteworthy that LAMP does not need special reagents or electrophoresis to detect the amplified DNA. This review describes the development and application of an embryo sexing method using LAMP in cattle and water buffaloes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23965599 PMCID: PMC3944364 DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2013-028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Dev ISSN: 0916-8818 Impact factor: 2.214
Fig. 1.The principles of DNA amplification by LAMP. (A) Design of primers. (B) Basic principle.
Fig. 2.Bovine embryo sexing kit with LAMP (A) and detection of DNA amplification by the turbidity of reaction mixture (B). The reaction tube on the left side in panel B shows the white precipitate of magnesium pyrophosphate yielded by LAMP reaction.
Sensitivity and accuracy of LAMP-based embryo sexing in cattle
| No. of blastomeres | No. of embryos | No. (%) with satellite | No. (%) correctly |
| 1 | 15 | 12 (80) | 9 (75) |
| 2 | 28 | 26 (93) | 23 (88) |
| 3 | 16 | 13 (81) | 13 (100) |
| 4 | 16 | 16 (100) | 16 (100) |
| 5 | 17 | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
Fig. 3.Real-time monitoring of DNA amplification using the turbidity of the LAMP reaction mixture. Absorbance of the reaction mixture at 650 nm was measured every 30 sec for turbidity detection. Male-specific reactions using DNA extracted from a single blastomere (●) and S4 (3000 copies) plasmid DNA (○) as a template. Male-female common reactions using DNA extracted from a single blastomere (■) and a 1.715 satellite sequence (3×105 copies) plasmid DNA (□) as a template.
Cytogenetic and DNA analysis of chromosomal chimerism in peripheral blood
| Animal | Sex chromosome analysis | DNA analysis | |||||||
| Number | Age (weeks) | Vaginal length (cm) | 60 XX | 60 XY | (XY %) | PCR | LAMP | ||
| 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 8 | (44) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 2 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 13 | (52) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 3 | 1 | 6 | 147 | 53 | (27) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 4 | 5 | 7.5 | 167 | 33 | (17) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 5 | 2 | 8 | 154 | 46 | (23) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 6 | 1 | 9 | 74 | 186 | (72) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 7 | 3 | 9 | 37 | 10 | (21) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 8 | 2 | 9 | 171 | 29 | (15) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 9 | 10 | 10 | 161 | 39 | (20) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 10 | 1 | 11.5 | 153 | 32 | (17) | Chimera | Chimera | ||
| 1 | 1 | 9 | 200 | 0 | (0) | Normal | Normal | ||
| 12 | 3 | 9.5 | 200 | 0 | (0) | Normal | Normal | ||
| 13 | 3 | 12 | 200 | 0 | (0) | Normal | Normal | ||
| 14 | 2 | NE | 200 | 0 | (0) | Normal | Normal | ||
NE, not examined.