Literature DB >> 23965547

Sample size formulae for the Bayesian continual reassessment method.

Ying Kuen Cheung1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the planning of a dose finding study, a primary design objective is to maintain high accuracy in terms of the probability of selecting the maximum tolerated dose. While numerous dose finding methods have been proposed in the literature, concrete guidance on sample size determination is lacking.
PURPOSE: With a motivation to provide quick and easy calculations during trial planning, we present closed form formulae for sample size determination associated with the use of the Bayesian continual reassessment method (CRM).
METHODS: We examine the sampling distribution of a nonparametric optimal design and exploit it as a proxy to empirically derive an accuracy index of the CRM using linear regression.
RESULTS: We apply the formulae to determine the sample size of a phase I trial of PTEN-long in pancreatic cancer patients and demonstrate that the formulae give results very similar to simulation. The formulae are implemented by an R function 'getn' in the package 'dfcrm'. LIMITATIONS: The results are developed for the Bayesian CRM and should be validated by simulation when used for other dose finding methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The analytical formulae we propose give quick and accurate approximation of the required sample size for the CRM. The approach used to derive the formulae can be applied to obtain sample size formulae for other dose finding methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23965547      PMCID: PMC3843987          DOI: 10.1177/1740774513497294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  15 in total

1.  Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Y Lin; W J Shih
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Non-parametric optimal design in dose finding studies.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Xavier Paoletti; Jean Maccario
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.

Authors:  Mei-Yin Polley; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; L Z Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Stochastic approximation with virtual observations for dose-finding on discrete levels.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  Commentary on 'Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs'.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A random walk rule for phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  S D Durham; N Flournoy; W F Rosenberger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Model calibration in the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Shing M Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  14 in total

1.  Sample size considerations for clinical research studies in nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Cody Chiuzan; Erin A West; Jimmy Duong; Ken Y K Cheung; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Implementation of adaptive methods in early-phase clinical trials.

Authors:  Gina R Petroni; Nolan A Wages; Gautier Paux; Frédéric Dubois
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Clinical Trials in Neurovirology: Successes, Challenges, and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Dietrich Haubenberger; David B Clifford
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Bayesian Sample Size Planning Tool for Phase I Dose-Finding Trials.

Authors:  Xiaolei Lin; Jiaying Lyu; Shijie Yuan; Dehua Bi; Sue-Jane Wang; Yuan Ji
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-08

5.  Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Motivating sample sizes in adaptive Phase I trials via Bayesian posterior credible intervals.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.701

7.  A simulation-free approach to assessing the performance of the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Optimizing Hippocampal-Cortical Network Modulation via Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Dose-Finding Study Using the Continual Reassessment Method.

Authors:  Michael Freedberg; Jack A Reeves; Andrew C Toader; Molly S Hermiller; Eunhee Kim; Dietrich Haubenberger; Ying Kuen Cheung; Joel L Voss; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-10-30

9.  Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Nolan A Wages; Karyn A Goodman; A Craig Lockhart
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01

10.  Would the Recommended Dose Have Been Different Using Novel Dose-Finding Designs? Comparing Dose-Finding Designs in Published Trials.

Authors:  Rebecca B Silva; Christina Yap; Richard Carvajal; Shing M Lee
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.