Literature DB >> 23964972

Neurophysiological Manifestations of Phonological Processing: Latency Variation of a Negative ERP Component Timelocked to Phonological Mismatch.

P Praamstra1, A S Meyer, W J Levelt.   

Abstract

Abstract Two experiments examined phonological priming effects on reaction times, error rates, and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures in an auditory lexical decision task. In Experiment 1 related prime-target pairs rhymed, and in Experiment 2 they alliterated (i.e., shared the consonantal onset and vowel). Event-related potentials were recorded in a delayed response task. Reaction times and error rates were obtained both for the delayed and an immediate response task. The behavioral data of Experiment 1 provided evidence for phonological facilitation of word, but not of nonword decisions. The brain potentials were more negative to unrelated than to rhyming word-word pairs between 450 and 700 rnsec after target onset. This negative enhancement was not present for word-nonword pairs. Thus, the ERP results match the behavioral data. The behavioral data of Experiment 2 provided no evidence for phonological Facilitation. However, between 250 and 450 msec after target onset, i.e., considerably earlier than in Experiment 1, brain potentials were more negative for unrelated than for alliterating Word-word and word-nonword pairs. It is argued that the ERP effects in the two experiments could be modulations of the same underlying component, possibly the N400. The difference in the timing of the effects is likely to be due to the fact that the shared segments in related stimulus pairs appeared in different word positions in the two experiments.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 23964972     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.3.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  30 in total

1.  Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

2.  Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Christian Obermeier; Sonja A Kotz; Sarah Jessen; Tim Raettig; Martin von Koppenfels; Winfried Menninghaus
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Lexical selection differences between monolingual and bilingual listeners.

Authors:  Deanna C Friesen; Ashley Chung-Fat-Yim; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Cleaving automatic processes from strategic biases in phonological priming.

Authors:  James M McQueen; Joan Sereno
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

6.  Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity.

Authors:  Amy S Desroches; Randy Lynn Newman; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Timothy Justus; Jary Larsen; Paul de Mornay Davies; Diane Swick
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80 ms during visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Lisa D Sanders; John Kingston
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.

Authors:  M Martín-Loeches; S R Schweinberger; W Sommer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

10.  Neural Processes Underlying Nonword Rhyme Differentiate Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Gregory Spray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.