Literature DB >> 23964804

Separable mechanisms in face processing: evidence from hemispheric specialization.

L A Hillger1, O Koenig.   

Abstract

This article addresses three issues in face processing: First, is face processing primarily accomplished by the right hemisphere, or do both left- and right-hemisphere mechanisms play important roles? Second, are the mechanisms the same as those involved in general visual processing, or are they dedicated to face processing? Third, how can the mechanisms be characterized more precisely in terms of processes such as visual parsing? We explored these issues using the divided visual field methodology in four experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 provided evidence that both left- and right-hemisphere mechanisms are involved in face processing. In Experiment 1, a right-hemisphere advantage was found for both Same and Different trials when Same faces were identical and Different faces differed on all three internal facial features. Experiment 2 replicated the right-hemisphere advantage for Same trials but showed a left-hemisphere advantage for Different trials when one of three facial features differed between the target and the probe faces. Experiment 3 showed that the right-hemisphere advantage obtained with upright faces in Experiment 2 disappeared when the faces were inverted. This result suggests that there are right-hemisphere mechanisms specialized for processing upright faces, although it could not be determined whether these mechanisms are completely face-specific. Experiment 3 also provided evidence that the left-hemisphere mechanisms utilized in face processing tasks are general-purpose visual mechanisms not restricted to particular classes of visual stimuli. In Experiment 4, a left-hemisphere advantage was obtained when the task was to find one facial feature that was the same between the target and the probe faces. We suggest that left-hemisphere advantages shown in face processing are due to the parsing and analysis of the local elements of a face.

Year:  1991        PMID: 23964804     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  31 in total

1.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Dynamic adjustments in prefrontal, hippocampal, and inferior temporal interactions with increasing visual working memory load.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Asymmetries of the human social brain in the visual, auditory and chemical modalities.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giuliana Lucci; Andrea Mazzatenta; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A face-selective ventral occipito-temporal map of the human brain with intracerebral potentials.

Authors:  Jacques Jonas; Corentin Jacques; Joan Liu-Shuang; Hélène Brissart; Sophie Colnat-Coulbois; Louis Maillard; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The bimodal bilingual brain: effects of sign language experience.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Viewpoint invariance in the discrimination of upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Alissa Wright; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Auditory deprivation affects biases of visuospatial attention as measured by line bisection.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Carlotta Lega; Carlo Cecchetto; Costanza Papagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The "visual word form area" is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces.

Authors:  Leilei Mei; Gui Xue; Chuansheng Chen; Feng Xue; Mingxia Zhang; Qi Dong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Investigating attention in complex visual search.

Authors:  Christopher K Kovach; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Hemispheric contributions to the integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception.

Authors:  K Baynes; M G Funnell; C A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.