Literature DB >> 23963588

Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis, using the diagnostic support tool, and correlated factors in Japan: a population-based study.

Shoji Yabuki1, Norio Fukumori, Misa Takegami, Yoshihiro Onishi, Koji Otani, Miho Sekiguchi, Takafumi Wakita, Shin-ichi Kikuchi, Shunichi Fukuhara, Shin-ichi Konno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in the general population. The purposes of this study were to estimate the prevalence of LSS and to investigate correlated factors for LSS in Japan.
METHODS: A questionnaire survey was performed on 4,400 subjects selected from residents aged 40-79 years in Japan by stratified two-stage random sampling in 2010. The question items consisted of lower-limb symptoms suggestive of LSS, the diagnostic support tool for LSS (LSS-DST), demographic and lifestyle characteristics, comorbidities, the Japanese Perceived Stress Scale (JPSS), and the Mental Health Index 5 (MHI-5). Using the LSS-DST, the presence of LSS was predicted to estimate the prevalence of LSS. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between LSS and correlated factors.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were obtained from 2,666 subjects (60.6 %), consisting of 1,264 males (47.4 %). The mean (standard deviation) age was 60.0 (10.9) years. According to the LSS-DST, 153 subjects were regarded as having LSS. The prevalence was estimated to be 5.7 %. When standardizing this value with the age distribution of the Japanese population, it was estimated that 3,650,000 Japanese subjects aged 40-79 years might have LSS using the LSS-DST. Prevalence increased with age and was particularly high in subjects aged 70-79 years, irrespective of gender. As correlated factors, an advanced age (60 years or older), diabetes mellitus, urological disorders, and osteoarthritis/fracture as comorbidities, and depressive symptoms, were associated with LSS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidated the prevalence of LSS and factors associated with LSS in Japan. This is the first report describing the estimated prevalence of LSS and associated factors using a strictly sampled representative population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963588      PMCID: PMC3838585          DOI: 10.1007/s00776-013-0455-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


Introduction

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is defined as a syndrome in which narrowing of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen, which are nervous routes, related to degeneration of the lumbar intervertebral disks and/or joints, causes specific symptoms of the lumbar region and lower limbs [1-3]. Patients with this disease complain of numbness and pain in the lumbar and gluteal regions, and intermittent claudication leads to gait disorder in some cases [2, 4]. Although stenosis of the spinal canal is associated with organic abnormalities, for example spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in some patients, aging-related degeneration of the vertebral bodies and/or intervertebral disks may be etiologically involved in most patients [2]. Therefore, this disease has been regarded as common in elderly subjects. However, few large-scale epidemiological surveys involving the general population have been conducted to investigate the prevalence of LSS, possibly because it was difficult to apply subjects’ symptom and CT/MRI finding-based clinical LSS diagnosis [5] to a large-scale survey. Therefore, previous epidemiological studies had limitations such as a small sample size or study sample restricted to those with abnormal imaging findings [6, 7]. Furthermore, the prevalence of LSS varied among the studies, probably because of a lack of standardized methods and criteria for diagnosis. Therefore, it was difficult to interpret and compare the survey results. In epidemiological studies on LSS in Japan, the study samples were also limited to a population in a single city or patients who consulted a hospital with symptoms [8-10]. Konno et al. [11] developed a diagnostic support tool for LSS (LSS-DST) based on a self-administered questionnaire regarding patients’ symptoms for subjects with lower-limb symptoms suggestive of LSS. This facilitated large-scale questionnaire surveys on the presence or absence of LSS involving the general population. As risk factors associated with LSS, aging, gender, and body mass index (BMI) have been reported [12, 13]. However, these studies also involved only patients with abnormal imaging findings of the vertebrae. Therefore, to date, no study has investigated risk factors for LSS in the general population. The purpose of this study was to clarify the prevalence of LSS-associated lower-limb symptoms, estimate the prevalence of LSS, and investigate factors associated with LSS, using a cross-sectional survey involving a representative sample selected from Japanese residents.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This study was the JOA-Subsidized Science Project Research 2009 and conducted on commission from the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The protocol was approved by the ethics review board of Fukushima Medical University. The study population consisted of all residents aged 40–79 years old in Japan who were able to respond to a questionnaire. Sampling was performed by stratified two-stage random sampling. Briefly, as a first step, the nation was divided into 43 layers through a 9-area and 5-city scale, and 200 points were selected on the basis of the population of each regional block and/or city-scale-classified layer. As a second step, 22 subjects per point were randomly selected from “the Basic Resident Registration” to obtain 4,400 representative samples. We conducted a cross-sectional survey involving questionnaire placement along with visits to the subjects’ homes. The survey period was from November to December 2010.

Measurements

To examine the presence or absence of lower-limb symptoms associated with LSS, the following question was initially asked: Have you experienced pain, numbness, or flushes of the lower limbs (gluteal region, femoral region, and lower thigh) within the last 1 month?. Simultaneously, a figure was attached so that respondents could accurately understand the sites of the gluteal region, femoral region, and lower thigh. In subjects who reported the presence of lower-limb symptoms, we predicted the presence or absence of LSS by use of the LSS-DST. The LSS-DST consists of 10 question items and has a sensitivity and specificity of 84 and 78 %, respectively [11]. The items of a self-administered history questionnaire as the LSS-DST are shown in Table 1. Each item of the LSS-DST for diagnosis of LSS required a response either of “1 = yes” or “0 = no”. A total score of 4 on Q1–Q4 or a score >1 on Q1–Q4 and >2 on Q5–Q10 indicated the presence of LSS.
Table 1

The items of a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire (SSHQ) as a diagnostic support tool for LSS

Item
Q1Numbness and/or pain in the thighs down to the calves and shins
Q2Numbness and/or pain increase in intensity after walking for a while, but are relieved by taking a rest
Q3Standing for a while brings on numbness and/or pain in the thighs down to the calves and shins
Q4Numbness and/or pain are reduced by bending forward
Q5Numbness is present in both legs
Q6Numbness is present in the soles of both feet
Q7Numbness arises around the buttocks
Q8Numbness is present, but pain is absent
Q9A burning sensation arises around the buttocks
Q10Walking nearly causes urination
The items of a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire (SSHQ) as a diagnostic support tool for LSS The questionnaire included Mental Health Index 5 (MHI-5), which was measured using 5 items in the subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) [14-16]. Subjects with an MHI-5 score of 51 or lower, 52–59, and 60–67 were regarded as having severe, moderate, and mild depressive symptoms, respectively. To measure stress in daily living, the Japanese Perceived Stress Scale (JPSS) [17-19] was used. This is a scale that measures the level of perceived daily stress, but not the stress from a life event. Using the total JPSS score, the level of perceived stress was classified into 3 groups: weak (<18), moderate (≥18, <23), and strong (≥23). The questionnaire also included questions about age, gender, comorbidities, educational background, household income, marital status, smoking status, and alcohol consumption.

Statistical analysis

The prevalence of lower-limb symptoms associated with LSS is presented. On the basis of the presence or absence of LSS predicted using the LSS-DST, we estimated the prevalence of LSS in the Japanese population. In addition, on the basis of the population with regard to age in Japan in 2010 (Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications) [20], the data were standardized using the direct method to estimate the number of patients with LSS in Japan. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine risk factors for LSS. In this model, age, gender, comorbidities, educational background, household income, marital status, smoking, alcohol consumption, perceived daily stress, and depressive symptoms were used as explanatory variables. For statistical analysis, Stata SE version 12 software (Stata, USA) was used.

Results

Of the 4,400 subjects, questionnaires were obtained from 2,666 (response 60.6 %) (Fig. 1). The mean age (standard deviation) of the respondents was 60.0 (10.9) years. The proportion of males was 47.4 %. The respondents’ characteristics are shown in Table 2.
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the population-based study for prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)

Table 2

Characteristics of subjects (n = 2,666)

n (%) n (%)
Age (mean ± SD = 60.0 ± 10.9)Marital status
 40–49572 (21.5) Unmarried180 (6.8)
 50–59694 (26.0) Married2,056 (77.1)
 60–69789 (29.6) Separated/divorced/bereaved363 (13.6)
 70–79611 (22.9)Smoking status
Sex Never1,790 (67.1)
 Male1,264 (47.4) Past180 (6.8)
 Female1,402 (52.6) Current574 (21.5)
BMI (kg/m2)Alcohol drinking
 <18129 (4.8) Hardly ever or never1,441 (54.1)
 ≥18, <22988 (37.1) Sometimes469 (17.6)
 ≥22, <25916 (34.4) Almost every day683 (25.6)
 ≥25, <30458 (17.2)Exercise habit
 ≥30175 (6.6) No1,300 (48.8)
Number of comorbidities Yes1,253 (47.0)
 0984 (36.9)Occupation
 1713 (26.7) No1,536 (57.6)
 2≤969 (36.4) Yes1,067 (40.0)
Educational levelPerceived Stress (JPSS)
 Elementary-high school1,191 (44.7) Low (<18)815 (30.6)
 Professional school, Junior college327 (12.3) Moderate (18–22)756 (28.4)
 University or above360 (13.5) Severe (≥23)1,095 (41.1)
Household income (JPY)Depressive symptoms (MHI-5)
 <3,000,000645 (24.2) None (≥68)1,635 (61.3)
 3,000,000≤, <5,000,000665 (24.9) Low (60–67)424 (15.9)
 5,000,000≤, <7,000,000461 (17.3) Moderate (52–59)168 (6.3)
 7,000,000≤633 (23.7) Severe (<52)380 (14.3)

SD Standard deviation, BMI body mass index, JPY Japanese yen, JPS Japanese Perceived Stress Scale, MHI-5 Mental Health Inventory-5

Flow chart of the population-based study for prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) Characteristics of subjects (n = 2,666) SD Standard deviation, BMI body mass index, JPY Japanese yen, JPS Japanese Perceived Stress Scale, MHI-5 Mental Health Inventory-5 Of the respondents, 500 (18.8 %) had complained of LSS-associated symptoms of the lower limbs (pain, numbness, flushes) within 1 month before the survey (Fig. 1). The prevalence of lower-limb symptoms increased with age irrespective of gender, reaching a maximum at 70 years of age. Of the respondents, 153 were regarded as having LSS according to the LSS-DST (crude prevalence of 5.7 %). With regard to age (Fig. 2), the prevalence of LSS was estimated to be 1.9 % in respondents aged 40–49 years, 4.8 % in those aged 50–59 years, 5.5 % in those aged 60–69 years, and 10.8 % in those aged 70–79 years, showing an increase with age. With regard to gender, the prevalence of LSS in males and females of all ages was 5.7 and 5.8 %, respectively, showing no difference. However, in males and females aged 70–79 years, the prevalence was 10.3 and 11.2 %, respectively, which was slightly higher in females. Standardizing with the age distribution of the Japanese population, the age-adjusted prevalence of LSS using the LSS-DST was estimated to be 5.7 %, and the number of patients with LSS was estimated to be 3,650,000, among Japanese aged 40–79 years. The prevalence of LSS estimated with regard to residential area and urban scale is shown in Table 3. With regard to residential area, the prevalence in the Kanto (6.4 %) and Kinki (7.6 %) regions, in which the Japanese population is concentrated, was estimated to be high. However, with regard to urban scale, there were no notable trends in the estimated prevalence of LSS.
Fig. 2

Estimated prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with regard to age

Table 3

The prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in all subjects by local areas and the population size of the cities

No. of subjectsLSS(+)
n (%)
Local areas of Japan
 Hokkaido1387 (5.1)
 Tohoku2419 (3.7)
 Kanto84954 (6.4)
 Hokuriku1466 (4.1)
 Tokai33714 (4.2)
 Kinki38129 (7.6)
 Chugoku1636 (3.7)
 Shikoku746 (8.1)
 Kyusyu33722 (6.5)
Population size of the cities
 19 Largest citiesa 62534 (5.4)
 ≥200,00062740 (6.4)
 ≥100,00048327 (5.6)
 <100,00064837 (5.7)
 Rural areas28315 (5.3)

aThe 19 largest cities are Sapporo, Sendai, Saitama, Chiba, Tokyo, Yokohama, Kawasaki, Niigata, Shizuoka, Hamamatsu, Nagoya, Kyoto, Osaka, Sakai, Kobe, Okayama, Hiroshima, Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka

Estimated prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with regard to age The prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in all subjects by local areas and the population size of the cities aThe 19 largest cities are Sapporo, Sendai, Saitama, Chiba, Tokyo, Yokohama, Kawasaki, Niigata, Shizuoka, Hamamatsu, Nagoya, Kyoto, Osaka, Sakai, Kobe, Okayama, Hiroshima, Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka Among the respondents, we compared their characteristics between subjects who were regarded as having LSS by use of the LSS-DST and those who were not regarded as having LSS (non-LSS) (Table 4). In the subjects with LSS, the mean age was more advanced, and the number of comorbidities was greater. Among the comorbidities examined, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction, stroke, and angina pectoris), ophthalmic disorder, gastrointestinal disorder, urological disorder, osteoarthritis/fracture, neurological disorder, and osteoporosis were concomitantly present in larger proportions of subjects with LSS than in those without (non-LSS).
Table 4

Comparison of characteristics between subjects with and without lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)

LSS(−)LSS(+) P value
n (%) n (%)
Age (mean ± SD = 60.0 ± 10.9)<0.001
 40–49561 (22.3)11 (7.2)
 50–59661 (26.3)33 (21.6)
 60–69746 (29.7)43 (28.1)
 70–79545 (21.7)66 (43.1)
Sex0.934
 Male1,192 (47.4)72 (47.1)
 Female1,321 (52.6)81 (52.9)
BMI (kg/m2)0.113
 <18124 (4.9)5 (3.3)
 ≥18, <22940 (37.4)48 (31.4)
 ≥22, <25865 (34.4)51 (33.3)
 ≥25, <30420 (16.7)38 (24.8)
 ≥30164 (6.5)11 (7.2)
Educational level0.006
 Elementary-high School1,100 (43.8)91 (59.5)
 Professional school, Junior college314 (56.3)13 (8.5)
 University or above346 (70.0)14 (9.2)
Household income (JPY)0.004
 <3,000,000593 (23.6)52 (34.0)
 3,000,000≤, <5,000,000624 (24.8)41 (26.8)
 5,000,000≤, <7,000,000446 (17.8)15 (9.8)
 7,000,000≤603 (24.0)30 (19.6)
Marital status0.520
 Unmarried173 (6.9)7 (4.6)
 Married1,935 (77.0)121 (79.1)
 Separated/divorced/bereaved340 (13.5)23 (15.0)
Smoking status0.786
 Never1,690 (67.3)100 (65.4)
 Past168 (6.7)12 (7.8)
 Current541 (21.5)33 (21.6)
Alcohol drinking0.788
 Hardly ever or never1,363 (54.2)78 (51.0)
 Sometimes445 (17.7)24 (15.7)
 Almost every day642 (25.6)41 (26.8)
Exercise habit0.122
 No1,236 (49.2)64 (41.8)
 Yes1,173 (46.7)80 (52.3)
Occupation0.003
 No1,466 (58.3)70 (45.8)
 Yes988 (39.3)79 (51.6)
Perceived stress (JPSS)<0.001
 Low (<18)787 (31.3)28 (18.3)
 Moderate (18–22)720 (28.7)36 (23.5)
 Severe (≥23)1,006 (40.0)89 (58.2)
Depressive symptoms (MHI-5)<0.001
 None (≥68)1,574 (62.6)61 (39.9)
 Low (60–67)394 (15.7)30 (19.6)
 Moderate (52–59)157 (6.3)11 (7.2)
 Severe (<52)333 (13.3)47 (30.7)
Number of comorbidities<0.001
 0954 (38.0)30 (19.6)
 1685 (27.3)31 (20.3)
 2≤874 (34.8)92 (60.1)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension658 (26.2)66 (43.1)<0.001
 Diabetes mellitus199 (7.9)30 (19.6)<0.001
 Hyperlipidemia388 (15.4)25 (16.3)0.731
 Cardiovascular disease161 (6.4)24 (15.7)<0.001
 Ophthalmic disorder255 (10.2)34 (22.2)<0.001
 Respiratory disorder124 (4.9)12 (7.8)0.127
 Gastrointestinal disorder267 (10.6)25 (16.3)0.033
 Hematological disorder146 (5.8)10 (6.5)0.721
 Kidney disease63 (2.5)8 (5.2)0.062
 Urological disorder116 (4.6)19 (12.4)<0.001
 Osteoarthritis/fracture172 (6.8)36 (23.5)<0.001
 Rheumatoid arthritis49 (2.0)3 (2.0)1.000
 Dermatological disorder109 (4.3)8 (5.2)0.543
 Neurological disorder7 (0.3)3 (2.0)0.016
 Psychiatric disorder69 (2.8)6 (3.9)0.443
 Endocrine disorder83 (3.3)3 (2.0)0.483
 Pancreatic disorder26 (1.0)3 (2.0)0.230
 Malignant disease79 (3.1)7 (4.6)0.340
 Gynecological disorder108 (4.3)11 (7.2)0.104
 Osteoporosis95 (3.8)17 (11.1)<0.001
 Others98 (3.9)12 (7.8)0.032

SD Standard deviation, BMI body mass index, JPY Japanese yen, JPS Japanese Perceived Stress Scale, MHI-5 Mental Health Inventory-5

Comparison of characteristics between subjects with and without lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) SD Standard deviation, BMI body mass index, JPY Japanese yen, JPS Japanese Perceived Stress Scale, MHI-5 Mental Health Inventory-5 The associations of the subjects’ characteristics and mental factors with the presence of LSS are shown in Table 5. The adjusted odds ratio of LSS increased with age. In subjects aged 70–79 years, it was 5.38 times higher than that in those aged 40–49 years (95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) 2.03–14.21, respectively). There were no significant associations with gender or BMI. Concerning the number of comorbidities, the crude odds ratio was 3.38 in subjects with 2 or more comorbidities. However, the adjusted odds ratio of this association was not significant. With regard to individual comorbidities, there was an increase in the adjusted odds ratio in the presence of urologic disorder (2.17, 95 %CI 1.10–4.29), diabetes mellitus (2.05; 95 % CI: 1.14–3.67), and osteoarthritis/fracture (2.71, 95 % CI 1.53–4.82). In subjects with severe depressive symptoms as a mental factor, the adjusted odds ratio was 3.55 (95 % CI 1.97–6.40).
Table 5

Associations of individual factors and comorbidities with prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)

Crude analysisa Adjusted analysisa
OR95 % CI P valueAOR95 % CI P value
Age (vs. 40–49)
 50–592.55(1.28–5.08)0.0082.30(0.93–5.65)0.070
 60–692.94(1.50–5.75)0.0022.50(1.00–6.21)0.049
 70–796.18(3.23–11.81)<0.0015.38(2.03–14.21)0.001
Sex (vs. Male)
 Female1.02(0.73–1.41)0.9280.93(0.57–1.53)0.784
BMI (vs. ≥22, <25)
 <180.68(0.27–1.75)0.4270.47(0.10–2.16)0.333
 ≥18, <220.87(0.58–1.30)0.4861.40(0.81–2.40)0.228
 ≥25, <301.53(0.99–2.37)0.0541.89(1.08–3.32)0.027
 ≥301.14(0.58–2.23)0.7070.78(0.27–2.26)0.642
Educational level (vs. elementary-high school)
 Professional school, junior college0.50(0.28–0.91)0.0220.75(0.37–1.50)0.415
 University or above0.49(0.28–0.87)0.0150.74(0.38–1.47)0.392
Household income (JPY) (vs. <3,000,000)
 3,000,000≤, <5,000,0000.75(0.49–1.15)0.1830.85(0.49–1.46)0.548
 5,000,000≤, <7,000,0000.38(0.21–0.69)0.0010.58(0.27–1.25)0.165
 7,000,000≤0.57(0.36–0.90)0.0170.88(0.46–1.68)0.709
Occupation (vs. no)
 Yes1.674(1.20–2.33)0.0020.80(0.47–1.36)0.409
Perceived stress (JPSS) (vs. low)
 Moderate (18–22)1.41(0.85–2.33)0.1861.47(0.79–2.75)0.229
 Severe (≥23)2.49(1.61–3.84)<0.0011.50(0.81–2.77)0.197
Depressive symptoms (MHI-5) (vs. none)
 Low (60–67)1.96(1.25–3.08)0.0031.86(1.02–3.38)0.043
 Moderate (52–59)1.81(0.93–3.51)0.0801.34(0.53–3.37)0.538
 Severe (<52)3.64(2.45–5.42)<0.0013.55(1.97–6.40)<0.001
Comorbidities
 Hypertension2.14(1.53–2.98)<0.0011.21(0.75–1.96)0.428
 Diabetes mellitus2.84(1.86–4.34)<0.0012.05(1.14–3.67)0.017
 Cardiovascular disorder2.72(1.71–4.32)<0.0011.50(0.77–2.94)0.234
 Ophthalmic disorder2.53(1.69–3.78)<0.0010.97(0.53–1.78)0.932
 Gastrointestinal disorder1.64(1.05–2.57)0.0291.23(0.70–2.15)0.478
 Urological disorder2.93(1.75–4.91)<0.0012.17(1.10–4.29)0.026
 Osteoarthritis, Fracture4.19(2.79–6.27)<0.0012.71(1.53–4.82)0.001
 Neurological disorder7.16(1.83–27.97)0.0057.87(1.20–51.58)0.031
 Osteoporosis3.18(1.85–5.48)<0.0010.89(0.38–2.08)0.792

aThe crude analysis used single-variate logistic regressions whereas the adjusted analysis used multivariate logistic regression including all explanatory variables

OR Odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, BMI body mass index, JPY Japanese yen, JPSS Japanese perceived stress test, MHI-5 Mental Health Inventory-5

Associations of individual factors and comorbidities with prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) aThe crude analysis used single-variate logistic regressions whereas the adjusted analysis used multivariate logistic regression including all explanatory variables OR Odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, BMI body mass index, JPY Japanese yen, JPSS Japanese perceived stress test, MHI-5 Mental Health Inventory-5

Discussion

This study showed that in Japanese aged 40 to 79 years the prevalence of LSS-associated lower-limb symptoms was 18.8 %; the prevalence of LSS was estimated to be 5.7 % using the diagnostic support tool; and the number of patients with LSS was estimated to be 3,650,000. Yamazaki [8] reported that the prevalence of LSS was 12.5 %, but their survey was limited to a single city, and the mean age was 67.9 years, more advanced than for the population in this study. This may have contributed to the higher reported prevalence. In this study, a sample representing the Japanese population was selected by a stratified two-stage random sampling method. The response was 60.6 %. Furthermore, there were no differences in gender or age distribution between responders and non-responders. Therefore, the results of this study can be generalized to Japanese aged 40–79 years. In previous epidemiological studies, prevalence of LSS of 1.7–22.5 % was reported. Kalichman et al. reported prevalence of 22.5 % using data from the Framingham Heart Study. They diagnosed LSS by using multidetector computed tomography (CT) to assess coronary and aortic calcification, irrespective of the presence or absence of clinical symptoms in the lower limbs. In this study a subject could be diagnosed as having LSS only when he/she complained symptoms in the lower limbs. Therefore, we might have detected clinically more relevant patients with LSS. The estimated prevalence of LSS increased with age irrespective of gender. In particular, among elderly subjects, the prevalence in females was slightly higher than in males. This was consistent with the results of a previous study [12]. One reason to explain the slightly higher prevalence in females could be that aging-related degeneration of the vertebral bodies [2], which is the major etiology of LSS, may be closely related to osteoporosis in elderly females. However, in this study, the presence or absence of osteoporosis was not measured objectively, and its effect could not be clarified. This study showed that factors associated with the presence of LSS were age, some comorbidities, and severe depressive symptoms. We found no significant associations between BMI and the presence of LSS in this study. In contrast Venkatesan et al. [21] reported high BMI as a risk factor for cauda equina syndrome. The population of their study was young (mean age of 39 years) and could include patients with diseases other than LSS, for example lumbar disc herniation, which may cause the association between BMI and cauda equina syndrome. With regard to individual comorbidities, the presence of urological disorders and osteoarthritis/fracture was associated with the presence of LSS. The prevalence of these conditions increased with age. Concerning urological disorders, in addition to this, the presence of neurogenic bladder, as an LSS-related cauda equina symptom, may be associated. Aortic calcification was reported to correlate with degeneration of the intervertebral discs and spine [22, 23]. Diabetes mellitus, one of the causes of LSS, can also increase the risk of aortic calcification [24], and this may be an explanation of the association with the presence of LSS. Concerning neurological disorders, the questionnaire asked neurological disorders as “neurological disorders such as epilepsy” and did not discern actual diagnoses. Therefore the neurological disorders may have contained peripheral nerve disorders which could cause symptoms resembling those by LSS. This is one explanation for the association between neurological disorders and LSS in this study. No study has reported an association between the presence of LSS and depression. In this study, the adjusted odds ratio of severe depressive symptoms was as high as 3.39. Sinikallio et al. [25] reported the prevalence of depression of 20 % among the patients with LSS which was higher than that in general population. Guilfoyle et al. [15] reported an association between depressive symptoms and low back pain. These findings suggest the presence of low back pain, including LSS, may be associated with the presence of depressive symptoms. In this study, we elucidated the association between the level of depressive symptoms and the presence of LSS in the representative sample of the Japanese population, which was allowed by using the self-reported diagnostic support tool for LSS. Concerning the association between the presence of LSS and perceived stress in daily living, we found no significant association in the multivariate analysis. A previous study has shown a low correlation between perceived stress in daily living measured by JPSS and depressive symptoms measured by MHI-5, suggesting that those two concepts are different each other [19, 26]. The MHI-5 contains items gauging psychological factors such as anxiety and stress, whereas JPSS contains physiological items in addition to psychological ones. Such differences may have caused the inconsistent results of associations of JPSS and MHI-5 with the presence of LSS shown in this study. This study has some limitations. First, a questionnaire survey was used, so neither lower-limb symptoms nor LSS could be assessed objectively. For this reason, the accuracy of LSS diagnosis may not be particularly high. For example, some patients having related symptoms and a disease other than LSS, for example lumbar disc herniation, might be misclassified as LSS. However, we used a diagnostic support tool to predict LSS based on patients’ symptoms for the two reasons: It is impossible to diagnose LSS by use of diagnostic imaging procedures, for example MRI, alone. Even when imaging shows abnormal findings, clinical symptoms can be absent in some patients [26, 27]. No standardized diagnostic criteria for comprehensive evaluation based on imaging findings and clinical symptoms have been established. The sensitivity of the LSS-DST was 84 % and it is useful for predicting LSS in clinical settings. The sensitivity and specificity of the LSS-DST may differ depending on study settings. Because there are fewer subjects with typical symptoms of LSS or with suggestive symptoms in general populations than in clinical settings, the sensitivity could be lower and the specificity could be higher. The prevalence estimated in this study may differ from the true value and possibly have been underestimated. In this study, LSS was predicted only in subjects who complained of LSS-related lower-limb symptoms; therefore, clinically relevant LSS patients should have been selected. Second, this was a cross-sectional study, and we cannot indicate the causal relationship with risk factors for the development of LSS. In the future, a longitudinal study should be conducted to elucidate the causal relationship of LSS with depressive symptoms, as was suggested in this study. In conclusion, we estimated the prevalence of LSS-related lower-limb symptoms and LSS in a representative sample of the Japanese population. The involvement of mental factors in LSS was suggested, which should be further examined in a future longitudinal study. The prevalence of LSS will increase with further advances in the rapid aging of society. Therefore, the prevalence of LSS and associated factors for LSS revealed in this study may provide information important for the future development of medical policies.
  22 in total

1.  Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Christy C Tomkins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Is cauda equina syndrome linked with obesity?

Authors:  M Venkatesan; C E Uzoigwe; G Perianayagam; J R Braybrooke; M L Newey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-11

3.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The impact of spinal problems on the health status of patients: have we underestimated the effect?

Authors:  J C Fanuele; N J Birkmeyer; W A Abdu; T D Tosteson; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; James Rainville; Leonid Kalichman; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and lifestyle-related disorders: a cross-sectional multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Kazuhide Uesugi; Miho Sekiguchi; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David H Kim; Ling Li; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 8.  Atherosclerosis and disc degeneration/low-back pain--a systematic review.

Authors:  L I Kauppila
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Prevalence, Spinal Alignment, and Mobility of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with or without Chronic Low Back Pain: A Community-Dwelling Study.

Authors:  Naohisa Miyakoshi; Michio Hongo; Yuji Kasukawa; Yoshinori Ishikawa; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-05

10.  A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire.

Authors:  Shin-ichi Konno; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Yasuhisa Tanaka; Ken Yamazaki; You-ichi Shimada; Hiroshi Takei; Toru Yokoyama; Masahiro Okada; Shou-ichi Kokubun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  33 in total

1.  Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and psychosocial factors: a multicenter cross-sectional study (DISTO project).

Authors:  Miho Sekiguchi; Koji Yonemoto; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Takuya Nikaido; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Kinshi Kato; Koji Otani; Shoji Yabuki; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Impact and clinical significance of pedicle length on spinal canal and intervertebral foramen area.

Authors:  Chenxi Yuan; Hai Zhu; Dawei Song; Wang Wei; Ruofu Zhu; Xin Mei; Jun Zou; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-01-15

3.  Role of the Self-Administered, Self-Reported History Questionnaire to Identify Types of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Sensitivity Analysis.

Authors:  Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Parisa Azimi; Sohrab Shahzadi; Shirzad Azhari; Hassan Reza Mohammadi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

4.  Lumbar spinal stenosis is a risk factor for the development of dementia: locomotive syndrome and health outcomes in the Aizu cohort study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kobayashi; Ryoji Tominaga; Koji Otani; Miho Sekiguchi; Takuya Nikaido; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Kinshi Kato; Shoji Yabuki; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Christof Birkenmaier; Manuel Fuetsch
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-09

6.  Impact of lumbar spinal stenosis on metabolic syndrome incidence in community-dwelling adults in Aizu cohort study (LOHAS).

Authors:  Rei Ono; Misa Takegami; Yosuke Yamamoto; Shin Yamazaki; Koji Otani; Miho Sekiguchi; Shin-Ichi Konno; Shin-Ichi Kikuchi; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Evidence base and future research directions in the management of low back pain.

Authors:  Allan Abbott
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18

8.  [Percutaneous full-endoscopic bilateral decompression via unilateral posterior approach for lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Zhijun Xin; Menghan Cai; Wenjun Ji; Lin Chen; Weijun Kong; Jin Li; Jianpu Qin; Ansu Wang; Jun Ao; Wenbo Liao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

9.  Prevalence and Definition of Multilevel Lumbar Developmental Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Marcus Kin Long Lai; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23

10.  A valid model for predicting responsible nerve roots in lumbar degenerative disease with diagnostic doubt.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Li; Xuedong Bai; Yaohong Wu; Dike Ruan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.