Literature DB >> 10851099

The impact of spinal problems on the health status of patients: have we underestimated the effect?

J C Fanuele1, N J Birkmeyer, W A Abdu, T D Tosteson, J N Weinstein.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study of 17,774 patients who consulted spine centers in which the impact of spinal disorders and comorbidities on physical functional status were evaluated.
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect spinal diagnoses have on patients' physical functional status (SF-36 Physical Component Summary [PCS] score) compared with other common conditions and to quantify the effects of comorbidities on physical functional status in spine patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The burden of spinal conditions on a patient's function and the role that comorbidities play in this affliction are poorly quantified in the literature.
METHODS: Data from the Health Survey Questionnaire were prospectively gathered through the National Spine Network, a nonprofit consortium of spine-focused practices. Each patient's SF-36 score was summarized into a single PCS score. The correlation between diagnosis and comorbidity and PCS score was assessed using multivariate linear regression.
RESULTS: The study patients were a mean of 47.5 years of age, 54.7% were female, 52.3% had lumbosacral diagnoses, and 82.0% had had 3 or more months of pain. The population had a mean PCS score of 30.4 +/- 9.95 (SD) compared with 50.0 +/- 10.00 for the general United States population. The more comorbidities in a patient, the lower the PCS score (Spearman rank correlation = -0.27). The five comorbid conditions that lowered the PCS the most included congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), renal failure, rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus (all P <0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, age, gender, diagnosis, and comorbidity explained 12.1% of the variance in PCS score.
CONCLUSIONS: The PCS score is greatly affected in patients with spinal problems. The study population's PCS (30.4) was lower or similar to the PCS for patients with other illnesses reported in the literature: CHF (31.0), COPD (33.9), SLE (37.1), cancer (38.4), primary total hip arthroplasty (29.0), primary total knee arthroplasty (32.6), and glenohumeral degenerative joint disease (35.2). Further, the presence of comorbidity in spine patients adds to the burden of spinal conditions on functional status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10851099     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  54 in total

1.  Functional Comorbidity Index in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Corinna G Levine; Greg E Davis; Edward M Weaver
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  Does the wait for lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis surgery have a detrimental effect on patient outcomes? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Christopher S Bailey; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; David Taylor; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; Corinne Tallon; Yves Bureau; Jennifer C Urquhart
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-04-28

3.  Health-related quality-of-life status in Veterans with spinal disorders.

Authors:  Maxwell Boakye; Ryan Moore; Maiying Kong; Stephen L Skirboll; Robert T Arrigo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Intentions of Chiropractic Interns Regarding use of Health Promotion in Practice: Applying Theory of Reasoned Action to Identify Attitudes, Beliefs, and Influencing Factors.

Authors:  Marion W Evans; Harrison Ndetan; Ronald D Williams
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2009

5.  Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Peng; Long Chen; Jing Peng; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

6.  Health promotion practices in two chiropractic teaching clinics: does a review of patient files reflect advice on health promotion?

Authors:  Harrison Ndetan; Marion Willard Evans; Kaming Lo; David Walters; Michael Ramcharan; Patricia Brandon; Cathy Evans; Ronald Rupert
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

7.  Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Christy C Tomkins-Lane; Sara Christensen Holz; Karen S Yamakawa; Vaishali V Phalke; Doug J Quint; Jennifer Miner; Andrew J Haig
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and its imposters: three case studies.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-09

Review 9.  What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Kent Stuber; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Michael Schneider; Y Raja Rampersaud; Andrea D Furlan; Carol A Kennedy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  Jordi Alonso; Montserrat Ferrer; Barbara Gandek; John E Ware; Neil K Aaronson; Paola Mosconi; Niels K Rasmussen; Monika Bullinger; Shunichi Fukuhara; Stein Kaasa; Alain Leplège
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.